International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Fuzzy-Based Methodology to Determine the Environmental Factors Affecting Pre-Mature Mine Closure:An Approach to Sustainable Mining


Affiliations
1 Department of Mining Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
2 Department of Mining Engineering, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran, Islamic Republic of
 

Mine closure is regarded as the forth and the last phase of an open-pit mine planning and design. A mine will be closed when its ore reserves are totally exhausted but in some cases mines are closed due to various factors prior to the estimated reserve has been fully extracted. Among pre-mature mine closure agents, environmental factors play a major role in closure process. An appropriate investigation on environmental factors, followed by a successful mine closure plan, can result in reducing the adverse impacts of mining operations providing environmentally sustainable development. The aim of this study is to select and prioritize the environmental factors affecting pre-mature closure of an open-pit mine. With this respect, Angouran lead and zinc open-pit mine is considered as a case study. It is crucial to take into account the essential environmental criteria such as acid mine drainage, alkalinity, land or water pollution, etc.; hence, the issue is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problem. This paper presents an evaluation model based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) approach, one of the most effective MCDM methods, to choose the environmental factors affecting pre-mature closure of Angouran mine. The suggested method applied to the mine and the most effective factors have been ranked and selected as pollution due to heavy metals, the presence of pyrite in the tailings and waste dumps, and sediment of chemicals with scores of 0.22, 0.21 and 0.15, respectively.

Keywords

Environmental Factors, Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Pre-Mature Mine Closure, Angouran Lead and Zinc Mine.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Hilson, G., Murck, B., “Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective”, Resources Policy, 26, PP. 227-238, 2000.

  • Cowell, S. J., Wehrmeyer, W., Argust, P. W., Robertson, J. G. S., “Sustainability and the primary extraction industries”, Resources Policy, 25, PP. 277-286, 1999.

  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities), Promoting Sustainable Development in the EU Non-energy Extractive Industry. Communication from the Commission. COM, Brussels, 2000.

  • Ford, C., “Towards sustainable mining: the Canadian mining industry sustainability initiative. In: Anciaux, Onal (Eds.)”, A Review on Indicators of Sustainability for the Minerals Extraction Industries, de Villas Boas, Shields, Solar (Rio de Janeiro), P. 230, 2005.

  • ICMM, Reporting against the ICMM Sustainable Development Principles. International Council on Mining and Metals, London, P. 18, 2005.

  • Nikolaou, I. E., Evangelinos, K. I., “A SWOT analysis of environmental management practices in Greek Mining and Mineral Industry”, Resources Policy, 35, PP. 226-234, 2010.

  • Ebrahimabadi, A., Osanloo, M., “Mine closure process - factors, Planning and optimization, Seventh conference on the safety, Health and environment in mines and mining industries, Kerman Sarcheshmeh copper complex”,PP. 137-154, 2008. (In Persian).

  • Laurence, D. C., “Optimisation of the mine closure process”, Cleaner Production, 14 (3-4), PP. 285-298, 2006.

  • Sango, I., Taru, P., Mudzingwa, M. N., Kuvarega, A. T., “Social and biophysical impacts of Mhangura copper mine Closure”, Sustainable & Development, 8, PP. 186-204, 2006.

  • McKinley, M. J., “Mining.” http://www.pollutionissues.com/Li-Na/Mining.html, 2002.accessed 15.04.03. pdf

  • Bastida, E., Sanford, T., “Mine closure in Latin America.” A review of recent developments in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile and peru, 2004.

  • Driussi, C., Jansz, J., “Pollution minimization practices in the Australian mining and mineral processing industries”, Cleaner Production, 14, PP. 673-681, 2006.

  • Vintro, C., Sanmiquel, L., Freijo, M., “Environmental sustainability in the mining sector: Evidence from Catalan companies”, Cleaner Production, 84, PP. 155-163, 2014.

  • Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrcyz, W., “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11 (1–3), PP. 229-241, 1983.

  • Buckley, J. J., “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis”, Fuzzy Set and System, 17 (3), PP. 233-247, 1985.

  • Chang, D. Y., “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP”, European journal of operational research, 95, PP. 649-655, 1996.

  • Deng, H., “Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison”, approximate Reasoning, 21, PP. 215-231, 1999.

  • Zhu, K., Jing, Y., Chang, D., “A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP”, operational research, 116 (2), PP. 450-456, 1999.

  • Leung, L., Cao, D., “Theory and methodology in consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP”, operational research, 124, PP. 102-113, 2000.

  • Chou, T. Y., Liang G. S., “Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for shipping company performance evaluation”, Maritime policy and management, 28 (4), PP. 375-392, 2001.

  • Bozdag, C. E., Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., “Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems”, Computer in industry, 51, PP. 13-29, 2003.

  • Chang, Y. H., Cheng, C. H., Wang, T. C., “Performance evaluation of international airports in the region of east Asia”, In proceedings of eastern Asia society for transportation studies, 4, PP. 213-230, 2003.

  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z., “Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP”, Logistics Information Management, 16 (6), PP. 382-394, 2003.

  • Hsieh, T. Y., Lu, S. T., Tzeng, G. H., “Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings”, Project Management, 22, PP.573-584, 2004.

  • Mikhailov, L., Tsvetinov, P., “Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process”, Applied Soft Computing, 5, PP. 23-33, 2004.

  • Enea M., Piazza, T., “Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy optimization and decision making”, Kluwer academic publishers at New York, 3, PP. 39-62, 2004.

  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ruan, D., “Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey”, Production Economics, 87, PP. 171-184, 2004.

  • Tang, Y., Beynon, M. J., “Application and development of a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process within a capital investment study”, Environmental Economics and Management, 1 (2), PP. 207-230, 2005.

  • Tolga, E., Demircan, M., Kahraman, C., “Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process”, Production Economics, 97, PP. 89-117, 2005.

  • Basligil, H., “The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for software selection problems”, Engineering and Natural Sciences, 2, PP. 24-33, 2005.

  • Gu, X., Zhu, Q., “Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making method based on eigenvector of fuzzy attribute evaluation space”, Decision Support Systems, 41, PP. 400-410, 2006.

  • Tuysuz, F., Kahraman, C., “Project risk evaluation using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: An application to information technology projects”, Intelligent Systems, 21, PP. 229-284, 2006.

  • Ayag, Z., Ozdemir, R. G., “A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives”, Intelligent Manufacturing, 17, PP. 179-190, 2006.

  • Ertugrul, I., Karakasoglu, N., “The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection and an application in a textile company”, In proceedings of 5thinternational symposium on intelligent manufacturing systems, PP. 195-207, 2006.

  • Haq, A. N., Kannan, G., “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model”, Advanced Manufacturing, 29, PP. 826-835.

  • Haq, A. N., Kannan, G., “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model”, Advanced Manufacturing, 29, PP. 826-835, 2006.

  • Chan, F. T. S., Kumar, N., “Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach, OMEGA”, management science , 35, PP. 417-431, 2007.

  • Ertugrul, I., Karakasoglu, N., “Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods”, Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (1), PP. 702-715, 2009.

  • Zare Naghadehi, M., Mikaeil, R., Ataei, M., “The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite mine”, Iran. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (4), PP. 8218-8226, 2009.

  • Bangian, A. H., Ataei, M., Sayadi, A., Gholinejad A., “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy processing to define optimum post mining land use for pit area to clarify reclamation costs”, GSM, 27 (2), PP. 145-168, 2011.

  • Alavi, I., “Fuzzy AHP method for plant species selection in mine reclamation plans: case study Sungun copper mines”, fuzzy Systems, 11 (5), PP. 23-38, 2014.

  • Shao-shuai, Shi., Shu-cai, Li., Li-ping, Zhou, Li., Zong-qing, Jing. Wang., “Advance optimized classification and application of surrounding rock based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and tunnel seismic prediction”, Automation in Construction, 37, PP. 217-222, 2014.

  • Ebrahimabadi, A., “A Fuzzy AHP approach to select the proper roadheader in Tabas coal mine project”, Yerbilimleri bulletin for earth sciences, 35 (3), PP. 271-282, 2014.

  • Laurence, D. C., “Classification of risk factors associated with mine closure”, Mineral resources engineering, 10 (3), PP. 315-331, 2001.

  • Laurence D. C., “Optimisation of The mine closure process”, Cleaner Production, 14 (3-4), PP. 285-298, 2006.

  • Laurence, D. C., “Establishing a sustainable mining operation: an overview”, cleaner Production, 19, PP. 278-284, 2011.

  • Rashdinezhad, F., “Environmental engineering, Science and research branch”, Engineering faculty, Department of mining engineering, 2011.

  • Whitmore, A., “The emperor’s new clothes: Sustainable mining”, Cleaner Production, 14 (3-4), PP. 309-314, 2006.

  • UNEP, “Mining and environmental in the Western Balkan”, 2010. http://www.unep.org/pdf/MiningBalkans. accessed 15. 04.25, pdf.

  • Zadeh, L. A., “Fuzzy sets”, Information and control, 8, PP. 338-353, 1965.

  • Tsaur, S. H., Chang, T. Y., Yen, C. H., “The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM”, Tourism management, 23, PP. 107-115, 2002.

  • Ertugrul, I., Tus, A., “Interactive fuzzy linear programming and an application sample at a textile firm”, fuzzy optimization and decision making, 6, PP. 29-49, 2007.

  • Bojadziev, G., Bojadziev, M., “Fuzzy sets fuzzy logic applications”, World scientific publishing, Singapore, 1998.

  • Lai, Y. J., Hwang, C. L., “Fuzzy multiple objective decision making”, Berlin, 1996.

  • Kahraman, C., “Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy cash flows”, Chapter: Soft computing for risk evaluation and management: applications in technology, Environment and finance, 76, PP. 375-396, 2001.

  • Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., Tolga, E., “Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows”, Information sciences, 42 (1-4), PP. 57-76, 2002.

  • Saaty, T. L., “The analytic hierarchy process”, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

  • Roscelli, R., “Misurarenell_incertezza”, Torino: Celid, 1990. http://www.celid.it/node/85849accessed 15.04.25, pdf.

  • Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G., “The analytic hierarchy process series”, University of Pittsburg, 1990.

  • Bentivegna, V., Mondini, G., NatiPoltri, F., Pii, R. “Complex evaluation methods.” An operative synthesis on multicriteria techniques, Fourth international conference on engineering management, Melbourne, PP. 139-145,1994.

  • Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., Dogan, I., “Fuzzy group decision making for facility location selection”, Information sciences, 157, PP. 135-153, 2003.

  • Wang, T. C., Chen, Y. H., "Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection, OMEGA”, management science, 35, PP. 384-388, 2007.

  • Nadery, H., “Getting to know Angouran mine.” 2014. http://www.angooranim.mihanblog.com.accessed 15.4.25, pdf.

  • Borregaard, N., Dufey, A., “Environmental effects of foreign investment versus domestic investment in the mining Sector in Latin-America”, OECD Global forum on international investment conference on foreign direct investment and the environment lessons to be learned from the mining sector, 2002.

  • Bell, C., “Mine Clouser and Completion, Australian Government: Department of industry”, tourism and resources, 2006.

  • Heikkinen, P. M., Noras, P., Salminen, R., “Environmental techniques for the extractive industries”, Mine closure, 2008.

  • Miller, G., “Overview of mining and its impacts”, Evaluating mining project EIAs, PP.1-16, 2010.

  • Canter, L. W., “Environmental impact assessment”, 1999.

  • “Guidelines for preparing mine closure plans (MCG)”, Environmental protection authority, Government of Western Australia department of mines and petroleum, 2011.

  • Atayi, M., “Fuzzy multi criteria decision making methods’, University of Shahroud. 2011. (In Persian).

  • Tibbett, M., Fourie, A. B., Digby, C., “Mine closure”, Eighth international conference on mine closure, Cornwall, UK, PP. 625-640, 2013.

  • Mikesell, R. F., “Sustainable development and mineral resources”, Resources Policy, 20, PP. 83-86, 1994.

  • Walker, J., Howard, S., “Voluntary Codes of Conduct in the Mining Industry.” Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development Project (MMSD), IIED, London, 2002.

  • Wheeler D., Fabig, H., Boele, R., “Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive firms in the extractive sector: lessons from the case of Shell and the Ogoni”, Business Ethics, 39, PP. 297-318, 2002.

  • WCED, Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.

  • Warhurst, A., “Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment: drivers of tri-sector partnerships”, Corporate Citizenship, 1, PP. 57-73, 2001.

  • Hilson, G., Murck, B., “Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective”, Resources Policy, 26, PP. 227-238, 2000.

  • Jenkins, H., Yakovleva, N., “Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure”, Cleaner Production, 14, PP. 271-284, 2006.

  • Blinker, L. R., “Mining and the Natural Environment.” In: UNCTAD Series of Papers on Mining, Environment and Development, UNCTAD, 6, 2009.


Abstract Views: 593

PDF Views: 208




  • A Fuzzy-Based Methodology to Determine the Environmental Factors Affecting Pre-Mature Mine Closure:An Approach to Sustainable Mining

Abstract Views: 593  |  PDF Views: 208

Authors

A. Jannesar Niri
Department of Mining Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
A. Ebrahimabadi
Department of Mining Engineering, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


Mine closure is regarded as the forth and the last phase of an open-pit mine planning and design. A mine will be closed when its ore reserves are totally exhausted but in some cases mines are closed due to various factors prior to the estimated reserve has been fully extracted. Among pre-mature mine closure agents, environmental factors play a major role in closure process. An appropriate investigation on environmental factors, followed by a successful mine closure plan, can result in reducing the adverse impacts of mining operations providing environmentally sustainable development. The aim of this study is to select and prioritize the environmental factors affecting pre-mature closure of an open-pit mine. With this respect, Angouran lead and zinc open-pit mine is considered as a case study. It is crucial to take into account the essential environmental criteria such as acid mine drainage, alkalinity, land or water pollution, etc.; hence, the issue is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problem. This paper presents an evaluation model based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) approach, one of the most effective MCDM methods, to choose the environmental factors affecting pre-mature closure of Angouran mine. The suggested method applied to the mine and the most effective factors have been ranked and selected as pollution due to heavy metals, the presence of pyrite in the tailings and waste dumps, and sediment of chemicals with scores of 0.22, 0.21 and 0.15, respectively.

Keywords


Environmental Factors, Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Pre-Mature Mine Closure, Angouran Lead and Zinc Mine.

References