Biometrics and Bioinformatics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Diagnosis Brain Diseases Using EEG Signal Classification Features


Affiliations
1 Department of IT, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The project proposes Associate in nursing automatic network for stage classification victimization artificial neural network for tumour and brain disorder detection for medical application. The detection of the tumour could be a difficult drawback, as a result of the structure of the tumour cells. The artificially created neural network are accustomed classify the stage of brain graphical record signal that's tumour case or brain disorder case or traditional. The manual analysis of the signal is time intense, inexact and needs intensive trained person to avoid diagnostic errors. Back Propagation Network with image and processing techniques was used to implement an automatic tumour classification. The higher process was performed in 2 stages: feature extraction victimization Principal element Analysis and therefore the classification victimization Back Propagation Network (BPN). The performance of the BPN classifier was evaluated in terms of coaching performance and classification accuracies. Back Propagation Network offers quick and correct classification than alternative neural networks and it's a promising tool for classification of the Tumors.

Keywords

Back Propagation Network, Feature Extraction, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Electroencephalogram (EEG).
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • F. Lotte, M. Congedo, A. L´ecuyer, F. Lamarche, and B. Arnaldi, “A review of classification algorithms for eeg-based brain–computer interfaces,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 4, p. R1, 2007.

  • G. Pfurtscheller, C. Neuper, A. Schlogl, and K. Lugger, “Separability of eeg signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters,” IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 316–325, Sep. 1998.

  • B. Blankertz, R. Tomioka, S. Lemm, M. Kawanabe, and K.-R. Muller, “Optimizing spatial filters for robust eeg single-trial analysis,” IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2008.

  • T. Felzer and B. Freisieben, “Analyzing eeg signals using the probability estimating guarded neural classifier,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 361–371, Dec. 2003.

  • K.-R. Muller, C. W. Anderson, and G. E. Birch, “Linear and nonlinear methods for brain-computer interfaces,” IEEE Trans.Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 165–169, Jun. 2003.

  • N. Bigdely-Shamlo, A. Vankov, R. Ramirez, and S. Makeig, “Brain activity-based image classification from rapid serial visual presentation,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 432–441, Oct. 2008.

  • A. Gerson, L. Parra, and P. Sajda, “Cortically coupled computer vision for rapid image search,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 174–179, Jun. 2006.

  • Y. Huang, D. Erdogmus, S. Mathan, and M. Pavel, “Large-scale image database triage via eeg evoked responses,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 2008, pp. 429–432.

  • M. Kaper, P. Meinicke, U. Grossekathoefer, T. Lingner, and H. Ritter, “BCI competition 2003-data set iib: Support vector machines for the p300 speller paradigm,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1073– 1076, Jun. 2004.

  • E. Donchin,W. Ritter, andW. McCallum, “Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP,” in Event-related Brain Potentials Man, E. Callaway, P. Teuting, and S. H. Koslow, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 1978, pp. 349–411.

  • E. Donchin, K. Spencer, and R. Wijesinghe, “The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a p300-based brain-computer interface,” IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 174–179, Jun. 2000.

  • E. Sellers and E. Donchin, “A p300-based brain-computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients,” Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 117, pp. 538–548, 2006.

  • J.Wolpaw,N.Birbaumer,D.McFarland, G. Pfurtscheller, and T.Vaughan, “Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control,” Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 113, pp. 767–791, 2002.

  • J. Wolpaw and D. McFarland, “Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans,” in Proc. Nat. Academy Sci. United States Am., vol. 101, p. 17849, 2004.

  • J. Muller-Gerking, G. Pfurtscheller, and H. Flyvbjerg, “Designing optimal spatial filters for single-trial eeg classification in a movement task,” Clin.Neurophysiol., vol. 110, pp. 787–798, 1999.


Abstract Views: 247

PDF Views: 4




  • Diagnosis Brain Diseases Using EEG Signal Classification Features

Abstract Views: 247  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

B. Sivaranjani
Department of IT, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, India
S. Rekha
Department of IT, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, India

Abstract


The project proposes Associate in nursing automatic network for stage classification victimization artificial neural network for tumour and brain disorder detection for medical application. The detection of the tumour could be a difficult drawback, as a result of the structure of the tumour cells. The artificially created neural network are accustomed classify the stage of brain graphical record signal that's tumour case or brain disorder case or traditional. The manual analysis of the signal is time intense, inexact and needs intensive trained person to avoid diagnostic errors. Back Propagation Network with image and processing techniques was used to implement an automatic tumour classification. The higher process was performed in 2 stages: feature extraction victimization Principal element Analysis and therefore the classification victimization Back Propagation Network (BPN). The performance of the BPN classifier was evaluated in terms of coaching performance and classification accuracies. Back Propagation Network offers quick and correct classification than alternative neural networks and it's a promising tool for classification of the Tumors.

Keywords


Back Propagation Network, Feature Extraction, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Electroencephalogram (EEG).

References