Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Providing QOS for Mobile Ad-Hoc Network


Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli -620 024, India
2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli-620 024, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In recent days, Mobile ad hoc network is an emerging trend and it has to face many challenges and issues. QOS (Quality of service) is a challenging prerequisite in mobile ad hoc networks. Mobile ad-hoc network is an infrastructure-less, self healing and nself-configurable network. Because of these reasons mobile ad-hoc network has to face many important QOS issues. This paper approaches a new proposal for providing quality of service in mobile ad-hoc network and dissects their performance. This paper based on the new proposal of Mixed Routing Protocol [MRP] was designed for providing quality of service in mobile ad-hoc network. The theme behind this proposal was the reactive protocol was set as background protocol and the reactive, proactive and hybrid protocols were mixed in the same topology. This concept provides the advantages of the three routing protocols of reactive, proactive and hybrid routing which produce tremendous performance for the same scenarios. The some of the metrics which accomplish the quality of service requirements like packet delivery fraction, throughput, average end to end delay and average jitter were calculated. This proposed work delivers 95% in efficiency. During simulation the number of events and total mobility were noted. We validate the scheme by simulating under different speed utilizations with IEEE 802. 11 Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) ad-hoc mode. The performance of the proposed scheme also discussed.


Keywords

Mobile ad-hoc Network, Quality of Service, Streaming, Delay, Jitter, Reactive, Proactive and Hybrid Protocols.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 228

PDF Views: 3




  • Providing QOS for Mobile Ad-Hoc Network

Abstract Views: 228  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

A. Boomarani Malany
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli -620 024, India
R. M. Chandrasekaran
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli-620 024, India

Abstract


In recent days, Mobile ad hoc network is an emerging trend and it has to face many challenges and issues. QOS (Quality of service) is a challenging prerequisite in mobile ad hoc networks. Mobile ad-hoc network is an infrastructure-less, self healing and nself-configurable network. Because of these reasons mobile ad-hoc network has to face many important QOS issues. This paper approaches a new proposal for providing quality of service in mobile ad-hoc network and dissects their performance. This paper based on the new proposal of Mixed Routing Protocol [MRP] was designed for providing quality of service in mobile ad-hoc network. The theme behind this proposal was the reactive protocol was set as background protocol and the reactive, proactive and hybrid protocols were mixed in the same topology. This concept provides the advantages of the three routing protocols of reactive, proactive and hybrid routing which produce tremendous performance for the same scenarios. The some of the metrics which accomplish the quality of service requirements like packet delivery fraction, throughput, average end to end delay and average jitter were calculated. This proposed work delivers 95% in efficiency. During simulation the number of events and total mobility were noted. We validate the scheme by simulating under different speed utilizations with IEEE 802. 11 Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) ad-hoc mode. The performance of the proposed scheme also discussed.


Keywords


Mobile ad-hoc Network, Quality of Service, Streaming, Delay, Jitter, Reactive, Proactive and Hybrid Protocols.