Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Hop Count Based Performance Evaluation of On-Demand MANET Routing Protocols


Affiliations
1 Department of Information Technology in Beant College of Engineering and Technology, Gurdaspur (Punjab), India
2 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering in Beant College of Engineering and Technology, Gurdaspur (Punjab), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A wireless mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is self-organizing, infrastructure less and distributed network. In recent years, several on-demand routing protocols have been proposed and prominent among them are Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) for wireless mobile ad hoc networks. This paper presents performance comparison AODV and DSR protocols using the standards of rigorous evaluation by considering a small average amount of network partitioning and large average shortest-path hop count to characterize simulation scenarios. Results indicate that AODV is a better performer than DSR and is suitable for large size mobile ad hoc networks.

Keywords

AODV, DSR, MANET, NS2.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 171

PDF Views: 3




  • Hop Count Based Performance Evaluation of On-Demand MANET Routing Protocols

Abstract Views: 171  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

Guresh Pal Singh
Department of Information Technology in Beant College of Engineering and Technology, Gurdaspur (Punjab), India
Amarpal Singh
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering in Beant College of Engineering and Technology, Gurdaspur (Punjab), India

Abstract


A wireless mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is self-organizing, infrastructure less and distributed network. In recent years, several on-demand routing protocols have been proposed and prominent among them are Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) for wireless mobile ad hoc networks. This paper presents performance comparison AODV and DSR protocols using the standards of rigorous evaluation by considering a small average amount of network partitioning and large average shortest-path hop count to characterize simulation scenarios. Results indicate that AODV is a better performer than DSR and is suitable for large size mobile ad hoc networks.

Keywords


AODV, DSR, MANET, NS2.