Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis of Bloom Filters for Wireless Sensor Network


     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Recently, Bloom filters have been used increasingly in networking applications, including packet classification, routing in P2P networks[10], string matching in Network Intrusion Detection(NID)[2] , flow rate monitoring etc., and in wireless sensor network(WSN) for updating configuration parameters and to distribute bulk data[13], to hide the data with low energy consumption[14], to identify the data locations in the nodes[15] . The basic Bloom filter has been extended in many ways to suit specific applications. Bloom filters allow false positives but the space savings often outweigh this drawback when the probability of an error is made sufficiently low.

 In this paper an attempt is made to survey the ways in which loom filters have been used and modified depending on the variety of network problems.

 


Keywords

Counting Bloom Filter (CBF), Compressed Bloom Filter (ComBF), Dynamic Bloom Filter (DBF), Incremental Bloom Filter (IBF), Pipelined Bloom Filter (PBF), Standard Bloom Filter (SBF), Weighted Bloom Filter (WBF).
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 220

PDF Views: 3




  • Analysis of Bloom Filters for Wireless Sensor Network

Abstract Views: 220  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

Abstract


Recently, Bloom filters have been used increasingly in networking applications, including packet classification, routing in P2P networks[10], string matching in Network Intrusion Detection(NID)[2] , flow rate monitoring etc., and in wireless sensor network(WSN) for updating configuration parameters and to distribute bulk data[13], to hide the data with low energy consumption[14], to identify the data locations in the nodes[15] . The basic Bloom filter has been extended in many ways to suit specific applications. Bloom filters allow false positives but the space savings often outweigh this drawback when the probability of an error is made sufficiently low.

 In this paper an attempt is made to survey the ways in which loom filters have been used and modified depending on the variety of network problems.

 


Keywords


Counting Bloom Filter (CBF), Compressed Bloom Filter (ComBF), Dynamic Bloom Filter (DBF), Incremental Bloom Filter (IBF), Pipelined Bloom Filter (PBF), Standard Bloom Filter (SBF), Weighted Bloom Filter (WBF).