![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
Graft Compatibility Studies in Interspecific Tomato-Potato Grafts
An inter-specific tomato-potato graft study was undertaken in a naturally ventilated quonset polyhouse at Palampur during the autumn and winter seasons 2015. The treatments comprised of combination of two tomato hybrids [Avtar-7711 (S1) and GS-600 (S2)] as scions, three potato cultivars viz. Kufri Himsona (V1), Kufri Himalini (V2) and Kufri Giriraj (V3) as ischolar_mainstocks and two grafting methods viz. tongue grafting (G1) and cleft grafting (G2). GS-600 tongue grafted on Kufri Himalini (V2G1S2) resulted in maximum survival of grafted plants (93.25%) as well as grafting success rate (81.68%). Kufri Himalini (V2) was found to be the best ischolar_mainstock for tomato scions which gave 2 maximum survival of grafted plants (87.89%) as well as grafting success rate (76.59%). Cleft grafting (G2) resulted in maximum survival of grafted plants (84.13%) and grafting success rate (72.95%). Tomato scion GS-600 (S2) was found to be the best scion for potato ischolar_mainstocks which resulted in a significantly higher survival of grafted plants (85.72%) and grafting success rate (73.85%) as well. Kufri Himalini+GS- 600 was the best ischolar_mainstock-scion combination giving maximum survival of grafted plants and grafting success rate irrespective of the grafting methods used. It is also concluded from the study that irrespective of the ischolar_mainstocks and grafting methods employed, scion GS-600 (S2 always had better survival in grafted plants and a significantly higher grafting success rate at least for the three best performing treatments and grafting tomato on potato plants in compatible combinations had a significant impact on their survival.
Keywords
Pomato, Vegetable Grafting, Graft Compatibility, Inter-Specific Grafting, Solanaceae.
User
Font Size
Information
- Brandt GR and Kollmann R. 1992. Studies on graft unions IV: Assimilate transport and sieve element restitution in homo and heterografts. Journal of Plant Physiology 139 (5): 579-583.
- Maharana T, Pati PN and Sahu GS. 1986. Effect of time of grafting in tomato-potato grafts. Advances in Horticulture and Forestry 4: 91-94.
- Maharana T, Pati PN and Sahu GS. 1990. Effect of growth regulators and micronutrients on growth and yield of potato-tomato grafts. Environment and Ecology 8 (4): 1327-1328
- Peres LEP, Carvalho RF, Zsogon A, Bermudez-Zambrano OD, Robles WGR and Tavares S. 2005. Grafting of tomato mutants onto potato ischolar_mainstocks: An approach to study leaf-derived signaling on tuberization. Plant Science 169: 680-688.
- Trudgill DL and Thompson R. 1987. The influence of stock and of scion on the growth and yield of potato plants produced by grafting cultivars of different maturity types. Potato Research 30 (2): 285-300.
- Tsror L and Nachmias A. 1995. Significance of the ischolar_main system in Verticillium wilt tolerance in potato and resistance in tomato. Israel Journal of Plant Science 43 (4): 315-323.
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 231
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 5