Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Economic Analysis of Milch Animals in Jaisinghpur Tehsil of District Kangra


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension Education and Rural Sociology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, India
 

In Himachal Pradesh the contribution of animal husbandry to total agricultural output has increased steadily over the years. Animal husbandry is an effective instrument of social and economic change for improving the living standard and quality of life across all sections of society. Moreover, the livestock enterprise provides stability and economic viability to the farming system on sustainable basis. The study was carried out in Jaisinghpur tehsil of Kangra district. A sample of 60 households was drawn from six villages using proportional allocation method. In the study area the size of holding was 0.61ha. The total number of livestock in terms of standard animal units was 2.51.The cropping intensity was higher on marginal farms.The sample farmers met the fodder requirement from owned and common lands. The marketed surplus and home consumption were higher on marginal farms as compared to small farms.Net returns from cow over total cost were found to be negative (INR. -391) in case of marginal farms, while it was positive (Rs. 223) in variable cost.The net returns over variable and total cost were found to be positive in case of buffalo. The break-even quantity (BEQ) for buffalo was 1245.30 litre.

Keywords

Economic Analysis, Cropping Intensity, Net Returns from Milk, Break-Even Quantity.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bhuyan R, Medhi D, Konwar BK and Saikia BN. 2004. An appraisal of feeding practices in the hill agro-climatic zone of Assam. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 21: 137-139.
  • DuttTriveni, Sinha RRK, Singh RR, Kumar Sanjay, Bhushan Bharat and Singh Mukesh. 2009. Economics of milk production under field condition. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79: 706-709.
  • Gauraha AK, Shrivastva RSL, and Mathur P. 2001. A comparative economics analysis of milk production for different milch animals in Chhattisgarh. Bihar Journal of Agricultural Marketing 5: 184-189.
  • Gupta JN and Agarwal SB. 1996. Economics of milk production in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 49: 556-561.
  • Grover DK, Sankhayan PL and Mehta SK. 1992. An economic analysis of milk production in Bathinda district of Punjab. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 45: 409-415.
  • Kumar P. 1994. An economic analysis of milk production (a comparative study of Kangra and Hamirpur districts of Himachal Pradesh). M Sc Thesis, p 84. Department of Agricultural Economics, CSKHPKV, Palampur, India.
  • Kumbhare SL, Sharma KNS and Patel RK. 1983. Standardization of bovine units. Indian Journal of Animal Science 53: 547-550.
  • Pandey R and Mishra A. 2011 Livestock fodder requirements & household characteristics in rural economy of hilly region, Uttarakhand. ENVIS Bulletin: Himalayan Ecology 19: 1-5.
  • Rana SS, Sharma SK,Negi SC, Soni RP and Katoch M. 2015. An explorating study on farm diversification in Himachal Pradesh. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 41 (1): 66-72.
  • Rana Shavaita 2015 Studies on causes and consequences of skewed child sex ratio. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 41 (1): 97-99.
  • Rao BD and Jyothi SH. 2006. An economic analysis of buffalo milk production in selected districts of Andhra Pradesh. Agricultural Situation in India 11: 467-471.
  • Sharma VP and Singh RV. 1994. Economics of milk production in Himachal Pradesh. Agricultural Situation in India 48: 717-720.
  • Singh V and Rai KN. 1998. Economics of production and marketing of buffalo milk in Haryana. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53: 41-52.
  • Singh Parasu Ram, Singh M, Jaiswal RS and Raikwar RK. 2004. Feeding of existing concentrate mixture to dairy animals in the Kumaon hills of Uttaranchal. Indian Journal of Animal Research 1: 28.
  • Thirunavukkarasu M, Sankaran VM, Kathiravan G and Karunakaran R. 2012. Estimation of green fodder availability and requirement for livestock in Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Economics Research Review 25: 566.
  • Vashist GD and Pathania MS. 2001. Requirement and availability of feed and fodder resources for bovine population in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 71: 367-37.

Abstract Views: 207

PDF Views: 4




  • Economic Analysis of Milch Animals in Jaisinghpur Tehsil of District Kangra

Abstract Views: 207  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

M. S. Pathania
Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension Education and Rural Sociology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, India
Amita Sharma
Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension Education and Rural Sociology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, India

Abstract


In Himachal Pradesh the contribution of animal husbandry to total agricultural output has increased steadily over the years. Animal husbandry is an effective instrument of social and economic change for improving the living standard and quality of life across all sections of society. Moreover, the livestock enterprise provides stability and economic viability to the farming system on sustainable basis. The study was carried out in Jaisinghpur tehsil of Kangra district. A sample of 60 households was drawn from six villages using proportional allocation method. In the study area the size of holding was 0.61ha. The total number of livestock in terms of standard animal units was 2.51.The cropping intensity was higher on marginal farms.The sample farmers met the fodder requirement from owned and common lands. The marketed surplus and home consumption were higher on marginal farms as compared to small farms.Net returns from cow over total cost were found to be negative (INR. -391) in case of marginal farms, while it was positive (Rs. 223) in variable cost.The net returns over variable and total cost were found to be positive in case of buffalo. The break-even quantity (BEQ) for buffalo was 1245.30 litre.

Keywords


Economic Analysis, Cropping Intensity, Net Returns from Milk, Break-Even Quantity.

References