Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kaur, Navneet
- Effect of Black Gram Genotypes and Nitrogen Levels on Yield Attributes and Yield of Maize under Maize + Black Gram Intercropping System
Abstract Views :155 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, Forages and Grassland Management, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
1 Department of Agronomy, Forages and Grassland Management, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 44, No 1&2 (2018), Pagination: 128-131Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Kharif season of 2017 at Agronomy Research Farm, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur to study the effect of black gram genotypes and nitrogen levels on yield attributes and yield of maize under maize + black gram intercropping system. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design comprising of five genotypes of black gram (Him Mash-1, DKU-118, DKU-82, DKU-98 and DKU-99) and two nitrogen levels (50 and 100 % recommended dose of nitrogen for maize). Experimental site was silty clay loam in texture, acidic in reaction, low in available nitrogen, and medium in available phosphorus and potassium. Intercropping with different mash varieties significantly influenced yield attributes and yields of maize. The highest number of grains/cob (539), test weight (238 g), grain yield (3501.3 kg/ha) of maize was recorded in maize + Him Mash-1 intercropping system. Application of 100% recommended dose of nitrogen resulted in significantly higher values of yield attributes and yields as compared to 50% recommended dose of nitrogen. Sole maize crop recorded higher values of yield attributes and yields of maize over intercropped maize. Him mash-1 with 100% recommended dose of nitrogen significantly improved the yield attributes of maize.Keywords
Black Gram, Maize, Yield, Yield Attributes.Full Text
References
- Anonymous. 2016 a. Annual report of All India Coordinated Maize Improvement Project. Directorate of Maize Research, ICAR, New Delhi.
- Anonymous. 2016b. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.faostat.fao.org.com.
- Anonymous. 2016c. e-Pulses Data Book.http://www.iipr.res.in/e-pulse-data-book.
- Anonymous. 2017. https://www.fas.usda.gov.in.statewise.
- Bakht J, Ahmad S, Tariq M, Akbar H and Shafi M. 2006. Response of maize to planting methods and fertilizer N. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 1 (3): 8-14.
- Khatun HA, Hasan MM, Sultana S, Khatun M and Rahman ME. 2012. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen levels on the growth and yield of maize. Biological and Biomedical Report 2 (2): 87-93.
- Mandal MK, Banerjee M, Banerjee H, Alipatra A and Malik GC. 2014. Productivity of maize (Zea mays) based intercropping system during kharif season under red and lateritic tract of West Bengal. The Bioscan 9 (1): 31?35.
- Patra BC, Mandal BK and Mandal BB. 1990. Profitability of maize + legume intercropping system. Indian Agriculturist 34 (4): 227 – 233.
- Raskar SS, Sonani VV and Shelke AV. 2012. Effects of different levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and zinc on yield and yield attributes of maize (Zea mays L.). Advance Research Journal of Improvement 3 (2): 126-128.
- Savitha M, Bedi S and Vashist KK. 2011. Performance of winter maize (Zea maysL.) hybrid to planting methods and nitrogen levels. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(1): 50?54.
- Suryavanshi VP, Chavan BN, Jadhav VT and Baig MIA. 2008. Response of maize to nitrogen and phosphorus application in Vertisols. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 26 (3-4): 293-296.
- Effect of Organic Sources of Nutrients on Growth and Growth Indices of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Under Mid Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh
Abstract Views :333 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
2 Department of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
3 Ph.D. Students, Department of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
2 Department of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
3 Ph.D. Students, Department of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 46, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 201-204Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur during the Kharif 2019, to evaluate the effect of organic nutrient sources on growth and growth indices of cowpea. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design consisting of eight treatments [T1-Bijamrita + Jiwamrita (5%, 10% and 10%, respectively at 21, 42 & 63 DAS), T2–Bijamrita + Ghanajiwamrita (250 kg/ha), T3 - Bijamrita + Jiwamrita (5%, 10% and 10%, respectively at 21, 42 & 63 DAS) + Ghanajiwamrita (250 kg/ha), T4 - Farm yard manure (10 t/ha), T5 - Farm yard manure (10 t/ha) + Ghanajiwamrita (250 kg/ha), T6 - Biofertilizers (Rhizobium + PSB @ 10g/kg of seed) + Farm yard manure (10t/ha) + Vermiwash at 15, 30 & 45 DAS (1:10), T7 - Biofertilizers (Rhizobium + PSB @10 g/kg of seed) + Vermicompost (7.5 t/ha) + Vermiwash at 15, 30 & 45 DAS (1:10), T8 - Absolute control]. Application of farm yard manure @10 t/ha + Ghanajiwamrita @ 250 kg/ha resulted in the significantly higher values of plant height, dry matter accumulation, absolute growth rate and unit area efficiency over rest of the treatments.Keywords
Cowpea, Dry Matter Accumulation, Nutrients, Plant Height.Full Text
References
- Anonymous. 2017. Annual Report. Directorate of Pulses Development, Vindhyachal Bhavan, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Ministry of agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, Bhopal.
- Anonymous. 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy. (http://www.faostat.fao.org).
- Davis DW, Oelke EA, Oplinger ES, Doll JD, Hanson CV and Patnam DH. 2000. Alternative Field crops Manual. http.//www.Hort.purduc.edu/newcrop/afcm/cowpea.html.
- Pargi KL, Leva RL, Vaghasiya HY and Patel HA. 2016. Integrated nutrient management in summer cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) under south Gujarat condition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7(9): 1513-1522.
- Singh AK, Bhatt BP, Sundaram PK and Kumar S. 2012. Study of site specific nutrients management of cowpea seed production and their effect on soil nutrient status. Journal of Agricultural Science 4 (10): 191-198.
- Yogananda SB, Devakumar N, Shruti MK and Ningaraju. 2015. Growth and yield of cowpea as influenced by different sources of organic manures. In: National Symposium on Organic Agriculture for Sustainable Food Security: Challenges and Opportunities, Tamil Nadu, India. P 113.
- Studies on Irrigation Scheduling and Nutrient Management on Wheat Growth and Productivity
Abstract Views :75 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Tigangam P. Gangmei
1,
Navneet Kaur
1,
Alisha Thakur
1,
Sidharth Baghla
1,
Kishor Kumar Sahu
1,
Anil Kumar
1,
Sandeep Manuja
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 01 (2022), Pagination: 48-55Abstract
This two-year research was aimed to identify the relationships between irrigation and nutrient management practices on crop growth and yield. Treatments consisted of three irrigation levels viz. recommended critical stages regimes (I1), irrigation at 0.6 CPE (I2) and irrigation at 1.0 CPE (2) in main plots and four nutrient management practices viz. inorganic nutrient management (F1), organic nutrient management (F2), natural farming management (F3), integrated nutrient management (F4) in subplots, laid out in split-plot design with three replications. It was revealed that irrigation at 1.0 CPE (I3) produced significantly taller plants and higher dry matter accumulation but did not influence the days taken for 50 % flowering and physiological maturity. Nutrient management practices also had a significant influence on these parameters in which integrated nutrient management (F4) was found to be superior for dry matter accumulation, plant height, days taken for 50 % flowering, physiological maturity and yield.Keywords
Irrigation, Nutrient management, Organic, Natural farming, Integrated, Inorganic, wheatFull Text
References
- Bikrmaditya, Verma R, Ram S. and Sharma B. 2011. Effect of soil moisture regimes and fertility levels on growth, yield and water use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Progressive Agriculture 11(1): 73-78.
- Fazily T, Thakral SK and Dhaka AK. 2021. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat. International Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology 8 (1): 106-118.
- Gopinath KA, Supradip S, Mina BL, Pande H, Kundu S and Gupta HS. 2008. Influence of organic amendments on growth, yield and quality of wheat and on soil properties during transition to organic production. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 82:51-60.
- HP Economics and Statistics Department, 2021. https://himachalservices.nic.in/economics/ecosurvey/en/ agriculture_and_horticulture.html
- Krishna A, Biradarpatil NK, Manjappa K and Channappagoudar BB. 2008. Evaluation of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) Cultivation, Seedling Age and Spacing on Seed Yield and Quality in Samba Mashuri (BPT-5204) Rice. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 21(1): 20-25.
- Kumar P, Yadav RK, Gollen B, Kumar S, Verma RK and Yadav S. 2011. Nutritional contents and medical properties of wheat. A review. Life Sciences and Medicinal Research 47 (2):145- 149.
- Kumar A, Nand V, Kumar R. 2016. Effect of different levels of irrigation under integrated nutrient management (INM) on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for central plain agro climatic zone of Uttar Pradesh, India. Plant Archives 16 (1):395-398 Kumar G, Nanad V, Kumar A, Singh AK and Himanshu. 2021. International Journal of Chemical Studies 9 (1): 2781-2785.
- Mishra G and Kushwaha H S. 2016. Winter wheat yield and soil physical properties responses to different tillage and irrigation. European Journal of Biological Research 56:530-537.
- Mohan B, Kumar P and Yadav RA. 2018. Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(1):1545-1547.
- Maurya RN, Singh UP, Kumar S, Yadav AC and Yadav RA. 2019. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Chemical Studies 7 (1): 770-773.
- Nand V, Singh G, Kumar R, Raj S and Yadav B. 2014. Effect of irrigation levels and nutrient sources on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Annals of Agriculture Research 35 Nayak MK, Patel HR, Prakash V and Kumar A. 2015.
- Influence of irrigation scheduling on crop growth, yield and quality of wheat. Journal of Agriculture Research 2 (1): 65-68.
- Neelam, Nanwal RK and Kumar P. 2014. Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on productivity and profitability of mungbean-wheat cropping system. Legume Research 38 (4): 509-512.
- Sain MK and Chaplot PC. 2014. Effect of nitrogen levels, organic manure and bio-fertilizers on nutrient uptake and quality of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and soil nutrient status. Environment and Ecology 32 (2A): 739741.
- Sheoran S, Raj D, Antil RS, Mor VS and Dahiya DS. 2017. Productivity, seed quality, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under organic, inorganic, and INM practices after 20 years of fertilization. Cereal Research Communications 45 (2):315-325.
- Singh V, Singh SP, Singh S and Shivay YS. 2013. Growth, yield and nutrient uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum) as affected by biofertilizers, FYM and nitrogen. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83 (3): 331-334.
- Verma HP, Sharma OP, Kumar R, Yadav SS, Shivran AC and Balwan. 2017. Chemical Science Review and Letters 6 (23): 1664-1669.
- Vishuddha N, Singh GR, Kumar R, Raj S and Yadav B. 2014. Effect of irrigation levels and nutrient sources on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Annals of Agricultural Research 35 (1): 14-20.
- Effect of tillage practices, seed priming and nutrient management on growth and yield of maize under rainfed conditions
Abstract Views :144 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Navneet Kaur
1,
Tigangam P. Gangmei
1,
Avnee .
1,
Anil Kumar
1,
Sandeep Manuja
1,
Sanjeev Kumar Sandal
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 196-204Abstract
Afield experiment was carried out for two years from 2020-2022 on maize to evaluate the effect of seed priming, tillage practices and nutrient management on growth parameters and yield of the crop in rainfed conditions. The experiment was laid in a factorial randomized block design, consisting of three factors. Factor A (Tillage practices) consisted of Conventional tillage (CT), Conventional tillage+ mulch (CT+M) and Zero tillage+ mulch (ZT+M); Factor B (Seed priming) consisted of Hydropriming and micronutrient priming; Factor C (Nutrient management practices) consisted of the recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and Integrated nutrient management. An additional treatment of control was also kept as an independent module for a general comparison of results. Significant differences in growth parameters and yield were observed as affected by tillage practices and nutrient management. All growth parameters and yield were found to be significantly better under conventional tillage+mulch (CT+M) as compared to other tillage practices. Moreover, integrated nutrient management proved to be comparatively superior to recommended dose of fertilizers in terms of growth studies as well as the yield of maize.Keywords
Seed priming, zero tillage, maize, integrated nutrient management, growth studies, mulch.Full Text
References
- Bhatt R, Khera KL and Arora S. 2004. Effect of tillage and mulching on yield of corn in thesubmontaneous rainfed region of Ppunjab, Iindia. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 6 (1): 126-128.
- Brar BS, Singh J, Singh G and Kaur G. 2015. Effects of long term application of inorganic and organic fertilizers on soil organic carbon and physical properties in maize–wheat rotation. Agronomy 5: 220-238.
- Gangmei TP, Kaur N, Thakur A, Bhagla S, Sahu KK, Kumar A and Manuja S. 2022. Studies on irrigation scheduling and nutrient management on wheat growth and productivity. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 48 (1): 48-55.
- Jaswal R, Sandal SK, Sahu KK and Sharma A. 2022. Effect of tillage on growth and productivity of rainfed maize grown with zero budget natural farming system in Himachal Pradesh. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 48 (1): 37-43.
- Khurshid K, Iqbal M, Arif MS and Nawaz A. 2006. Effect of tillage and mulch on soil physical properties and growth of maize. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8 (5): 593-598.
- Kumar S and Rana SS. 2021. Conservation agriculture and weed management effects on growth indices and yield attributes of maize-wheat cropping system. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 47 (2): 187-197.
- Kumar, V. 2015. State industrial profile of Himachal Pradesh, 17–26. Chambaghat, Solan: Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. Electronics Complex.
- Ma CJ, Bian CY, Liu XH, Yan ZX, Gao C, Ren YJ, Liu QR, Li QQ and Han HF. 2017. Effects of straw mulching on dry matter distribution and grain yield of summer maize. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 27 (2): 457-467.
- Mahesh LC, Kalayanamurthy KN, Ramesha YM, Yogeeshappa H, Shivakumar KM and Prakash H. 2010. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 6(1): 275-277.
- Moriaque AT, Felix KA, Anastase AH, Pascal H, Moncef B, Naivo R and Lione M. 2019. Effect of tillage and mulching on agronomics performances of maize and soil chemical properties in Linsinlin Watershed of Centre of Benin. African Journal of Agricultural Research 14 (31): 1421-1431.
- Omar AEA. 2014. Effect of FYM and phosphorus fertilization on yield and its components of maize. Asian Journal of Crop Science 6: 15-26.
- Ponmozhi CNI, Kumar R, Baba YA and Rao GM. 2019. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8 (11): 2675-2681.
- Sahoo G, Wani AM, Roul PK and Dash AC. 2021. Effect of integrated nutrient management on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake by maize (Variety MS 2) under poplar agroforestry system. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science 33 (16): 254-260.
- Subedi KD and Ma BL. 2005. Seed priming does not improve corn yield in a humid temperate environment. Agronomy Journal 97: 211-218.
- Zamir MSI, Javeed HMR, Ahmed W, Ahmed AUH, Sarwar N, Shehzad M, Sarwar MA and Iqbal S. 2013. Effect of tillage and organic mulches on growth, yield and quality of autumn planted maize (Zea mays L.) and soil physical properties. Cercetãri Agronomice în Moldova 46 (2): 17- 26