IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development of Affective Dissonance Scale for Adolescents


Affiliations
1 Selection Centre East, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The aim of this study is to develop a tool to measure affective dissonance (AD) of adolescents. The sample consists of 100 (Initial try-out) and 250 (Final try-out) respondents, age ranging from 13 to 18 and class ranging from 7th to 12th. Initially 50 items were constructed, and 48 items of 80 % unanimity by the judges were kept. Each item was followed by six likely emotions as alternatives containing three positive affect (PA) and three negative affect (NA), each one of which has to be rated on 5-point rating scale. With an eigenvalue of greater than 2.0 and factor loading of more than 0.45, factor analysis reveals two factor structure of the test. It reduced total number of items from 48 to 28. The first factor- Personal Affective Dissonance (PAD) consists of 18 items and second factor-Interpersonal Affective Dissonance (IPAD)is comprised of 10 items. The Cronbach's Alphareliability is 0.89 with all 48 items and 0.90 with 28 items. Besides face and content validity as judged by experts with 80 % unanimity, the construct validity of the scale has been worked out by calculating the correlation of different sub-scales of the AD with total scale score. The correlations are ranging from 0.77 to 0.90. With its so high reliability and validity, the scale ensures greater significance and wide application in the measurement of AD of adolescents.

Keywords

Adolescents, Affective Dissonance, Personal Affective Dissonance, Interpersonal Affective Dissonance.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aaker, J., Drolet, A., & Griffin, D. (2008). Recalling mixed emotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 268-278.

  • Babbie, E. (1989). The practice of social research (5th ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company

  • Beebe-Center, J. G. (1932). The psychology of pleasantness and unpleasantness. New York: D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc.

  • Beukman, T. L. (2005). The effect of selected variables on leadership behaviour within the framework of a transformational organisation paradigm. University of Pretoria. Pretoria: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-11082005-083347.

  • Blanchard-Fields, R (1997). The role of emotion in social cognition across the life-span. In K. Warner Shaie and M. Powell Lawton (Ed.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (Vol. 17, pp. 238-265). New York: Springer.

  • Brehm, J. W., & Miron, A. M. (2006). Can the simultaneous experience of opposing emotions really occur? Motivation and Emotion, 30(1), 13-30.

  • Brehm, J. W. (1999). The intensity of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 2-22.

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. PsychologicalBulletin, 775,401-423.

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Larsen, J. T, Poehlmann, K. M., & Ito, T. A. (2000). The psychophysiology of emotion. In R. Lewis and J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), The Handbook of Emotion (2nded.,pp. 173-191). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3-25.

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L.,& Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839-855.

  • Carrera, P., & Oceja, L. (2007). Drawing mixed emotions: Sequential or simultaneous experiences? Cognition andEmotion, 21(2), 422-441.

  • Carstensen, L. L., Derek, M. I.,& Susan, T. C. (1999). Taking time seriously :A theory of socio-emotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165-181.

  • Diener, E., & Emmons, R A. (1984). The independence ofpositive andnegative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47,1105-1117.

  • Diener, E., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1986). The relationship in experience between various types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1031-1038.

  • De la Rey, R.P (1978). Statistiese metodes in sielkundige navorsing. University of Pretoria, Pretoria: Unpublished manual for psychology students.

  • Edward, A. L. (1969). Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. Vakils, Feffer and Simons Pvt Ltd, Bombay, India.

  • Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.

  • Ersner-Hershfield, H, Mikles, J. A, Sullivan, S. J, & Carstensen, L. L. (2008). Poignancy: Mixed emotional experiences in the face of meaningful endings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 158-167.

  • Festinger, L. A. (1957). Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Fong, C. T., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2002). Dueling experiences and dual ambivalences: Emotional and motivational ambivalence of women in high status positions. Motivation and Emotion, 26(1), 105-121.

  • Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Freud, A. (1946). The Ego and the mechanisms of defence (Cecil Baines, Trans.). New York: International University Press.

  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.. Vol. 63 86). McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.

  • Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education (Vol. 2). New York. Appleton.

  • Hochschild, AR (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Kumar, P., & Mandal, M. K. (June, 2018). Identifying the markers of affective dissonance among adolescents: A grounded theory approach. Indian Journal of Health and Well-being. IAHRW Publications Private Limited.

  • Labouvie-Vief, G., Marlene D., & Diana B. (1989). Speaking about feelings: Conceptions of emotion across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 4, 425-437.

  • Larsen, R. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In D. Kahnemann, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40-60). New York: Russell-Sage.

  • Larsen, J. T., &McGraw,A. P. (2011). Further evidence for mixed emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1095-1110.

  • Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 684-696.

  • Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., Mellers, B. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The agony of victory and thrill of defeat. Mixed emotional reactions to disappointing wins and relieving losses. Psychological Science, 15, 325-330.

  • LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  • Lerner, R. M., & Steinberg, L. D. (2004). Handbook of Adolescent Psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken,NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Luescher, K., &Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 60, 413-425.

  • Malatesta, C, & Carroll, I. (1984). Facial expression of emotion in young, middle-aged and older adults. In C. Malatesta and C. Izard (Eds.), Emotion in adult development (pp. 253-274). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  • Priester, J. R., & Richard, E. P. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431-449.

  • Reich, J. W., Zautra, A. J., & Davis, M. (2003). Dimensions of affect relationships: Models and their integrative implications. Review of General Psychology, 7(91), 66-83.

  • Russell, J A. (1979). Affective space is bipolar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 345-356.

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.

  • Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity ofpositive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3-30.

  • Russell, J. A., & Feldman-Barrett, L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805-819.

  • Schimmack, U. (2005). Response latencies of pleasure and displeasure ratings: Further evidence for mixed feelings. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 671-691.

  • Smit, G.J. (1983). Psigometrika: aspekte van toetsgebruik. Pretoria:Haum.

  • Sonnemans, J., & Frijda, N. H. (1994). The structure of subjective emotional intensity. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 329-350.

  • Sparks, P., Harris, P. R, & Lockwood, N. (2004). Predictors and predictive effects of ambivalence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 371-383.

  • Thompson, E. R (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227-242.

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

  • Williams, P., & Aaker, J. L. (2002). Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist? Journal of Consumer Researches, 636-649.


Abstract Views: 274

PDF Views: 0




  • Development of Affective Dissonance Scale for Adolescents

Abstract Views: 274  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pramod Kumar
Selection Centre East, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


The aim of this study is to develop a tool to measure affective dissonance (AD) of adolescents. The sample consists of 100 (Initial try-out) and 250 (Final try-out) respondents, age ranging from 13 to 18 and class ranging from 7th to 12th. Initially 50 items were constructed, and 48 items of 80 % unanimity by the judges were kept. Each item was followed by six likely emotions as alternatives containing three positive affect (PA) and three negative affect (NA), each one of which has to be rated on 5-point rating scale. With an eigenvalue of greater than 2.0 and factor loading of more than 0.45, factor analysis reveals two factor structure of the test. It reduced total number of items from 48 to 28. The first factor- Personal Affective Dissonance (PAD) consists of 18 items and second factor-Interpersonal Affective Dissonance (IPAD)is comprised of 10 items. The Cronbach's Alphareliability is 0.89 with all 48 items and 0.90 with 28 items. Besides face and content validity as judged by experts with 80 % unanimity, the construct validity of the scale has been worked out by calculating the correlation of different sub-scales of the AD with total scale score. The correlations are ranging from 0.77 to 0.90. With its so high reliability and validity, the scale ensures greater significance and wide application in the measurement of AD of adolescents.

Keywords


Adolescents, Affective Dissonance, Personal Affective Dissonance, Interpersonal Affective Dissonance.

References