Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Bobbies on the Beat
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The public's knowledge about policing is varied and inconsistent and there exists a need for more visible, accessible and responsive policing by the men in uniform to carry out their duties with regard to patrolling. A review of literature indicates lack of research in the Indian context. A qualitative approach was employed to bring to light the aspects of beat system. Narratives were used to draw analysis. Focus group discussion (FGD) was done on a sample of 7 officers who were willing 2 females and 5 males of age groups ranging from 25 to 40 years. This FGD explored the difficulties faced during patrolling, its initiatives and community responsiveness. With the 'pluralisation' of policing, there needs to be a change in community partnerships to espouse the critical need for community engagement, active consultation and reassurance policing towards sustainable development.
Keywords
Patrolling, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), Community Engagement.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- Dalgleish, D., & Myhill, A. (2004). Reassuring the public: A review of international policing interventions. Home Office Research Study 284. London: Home Office.
- Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-211.
- Ghosh, S. K., & Rustamji, K. R (1993). Encyclopedia of police in India. Ashish Publishing House, New Delhi.
- Innes, M. (2004). Signal crimes and signal disorders: Notes on deviance as 'communicative action. British Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 335-355.
- Mehra, A.K. (1985). Policein Changing India. Usha, New Delhi.
- Skogan, W. G., & Hartnett, S. M. (1997). Community policing, Chicago style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Skogan, W. G. (2005). Citizen satisfaction with police encounters. Police Quarterly, 8, 298-321.
- Vollmer, A. (1935). How can bar associations improve police conditions. Brief 34,91.
Abstract Views: 300
PDF Views: 0