Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Employer Branding and Employee Engagement Influencing Psychological Attachment


Affiliations
1 Personnel Management & Industrial Relations, Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Present paper aimed to examine the role of employer branding and employee engagement in influencing the level of psychological attachment among the employee. Guiding theories underlying the present study are social exchange theory (Eisenberger et al., 1997) and the psychological contract theory (Miller, 2001; Rousseau, 1995; Robinson & Rousseau, 1994). Keeping in mind the cost-effective and strategic approach based on general HRM/OB/HRD principles in creating the positive work attitude among the workforce. The present study had investigated the underlying assumption, that high level of engagement and perceived employer branding by the employees' is responsible for, fostering the psychological attachment among employees. This study was conducted by critical review of previous survey results and of literature incorporating (corporate branding, internal branding, employee engagement, psychological attachment, human resource management & employee retention) in terms of their implications for the proposed framework i.e. employee engagement and employer branding is positively associated with psychological attachment. After exploring and critical review of literature incorporating psychological attachment, employer branding, and employee engagement it is found that although much research has been conducted in all areas, few studies have explicitly worked on psychological attachment and its relationship with perceived employer branding and employee engagement. The framework established in the study opens the doors of further investigation into other factors that seem to contribute in building psychological attachment.

Keywords

Employer Branding, Employee Engagement, Psychological Attachment.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abbasi, S. M., & Hollman, K. W. (2000). Turnover: The real bottom line. Public PersonnelManagement, 29(3) ,333-342.
  • Abrams, D., Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers' turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1027-1039.
  • Agarwal, R, & Ferratt, T. W. (2001). Crafting an HR strategy to meet the need for IT workers. Communications oftheACM, 44(7), 58-64.
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1) ,20-39.
  • Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501-517.
  • Balmer, J. M., & Gray, E. R (2003). Corporate brands: What are they? What of them? European Journal of Marketing, J 7(7-8), 972-997'.
  • Bar-Haim, A. (2007). Rethinking organizational commitment in relation to perceived organizational power and perceived employment alternatives. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7(2), 203-217.
  • Barrow, S.,Mosley,R.,&Schobitz,B. (2006). Internes BrandManagement: Machen Sie Ihre Mitarbeiter zu Markenbotschaftem.WlLEY-VCH..
  • Becker, T. E., & Billings, R S. (1993). Profiles of commitment: An empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 177-190.
  • Benkhoff, B. (1997). Ignoring commitment is costly: New approaches establish the missing link between commitment and performance. Human Relations, 50(6), 701-726.
  • Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.
  • Brown, S. P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. PsychologicalBulletin, 120(2),235.
  • Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546.
  • Chew, J., & Chan, C. C. (2008). Human resource practices, organizational commitment and intention to stay. InternationalJournal of Manpower, 29(6), 503-522.
  • Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M. (2002). A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenshipbehavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(&),927-946.
  • Cropanzano, R, & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
  • Cropanzano, R, Prehar, C.A., & Chen, PY (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group and Organization Management, 27(3), 324-351.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Literacy and intrinsic motivation. Daedalus, 119(2), 115140.
  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
  • Edwards, M. R (2005). Employer and employee branding: HR or PR. Managing Human Resources: Personnel Management in Transition,4, 266-286.
  • Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J.,Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(5), 812.
  • Gaiduk, R, Gaiduk, J., & Fields, D. (2009). Limiting the brain drain: Determinants of employee organizational attachment in Lithuania. Baltic Journal of Management, 4(2), 149-168.
  • Glen, C. (2006). Key skills retention and motivation: the war for talent still rages and retention is the high ground. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38(1), 37-45.
  • Hajdin, M. (2005). Employee loyalty: An examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(3), 259-280.
  • Hall, D. T, & Schneider, B. (1972, August). Correlates of organizational identification as a function of career pattern and organizational type. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 159-161.
  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268.
  • Hartley, J. (1996). Popular reality: Journalism, modernity, popular culture. Arnold.
  • Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2008). Taking brand initiative: How companies can align strategy, culture, and identity through corporate branding. John Wiley and Sons.
  • Hays, (2010). Employer Branding: The impact of the economic crisis. HAYS0101 OBrandinglntheCity survey_v3.indd.
  • Joo,B.K.,&Mclean,GN. (2006). Best ernployerstudies:Aconceptualrnodelfrornaliterature review anda case study. Human Resource Development Review, 5(2), 228-257.
  • Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341.
  • Kuijpers, M. A., Schyns, B., & Scheerens, J. (2006). Career competencies for career success. The Career Development Quarterly, 5 5(2), 168-178.
  • Lawler, E. E. (1992). The ultimate advantage: Creating the high-involvement organization. Jossey-Bass IncPub.
  • Lawler, E. E., & Hall, D. T (1970). Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(4), 305.
  • Lee, J., & Peccei, R. (2007). Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem in the context of job insecurity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(6), 661-685.
  • Lemmink, J., Schuijf, A., & Streukens, S. (2003). The role of corporate image and company employment image in explaining application intentions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 1-15.
  • Lievens, F., Van Hoye, G., & Anseel, F. (2007). Organizational identity and employer image: Towards a unifying framework. British Journal of Management, 18(s 1), S45- S59.
  • Love, E. G., & Kraatz, M. (2009). Character, conformity, or the bottom line? How and why downsizing affected corporate reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 314-335.
  • Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695-706.
  • Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-160.
  • Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171.
  • Maurya, K. K., & Agarwal, M. (2015). Employer branding internally: Strategy toward increasing organizational competitiveness and talent retention. International Journal of Human Resource and Industrial Research, 2(5), 1-7.
  • Maurya, K. K., & Agarwal, M. (2015). Internal employer branding with transformational leadership: To deal with changing workplace trends. Innovations and business management. Issues and Challenges, pp. 307-313.
  • Miller, D.T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 527-553.
  • Molm, L.D., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (1999). Power in negotiated and reciprocal exchange. American Sociological Review, 64(6), 876-890.
  • Mosley, R W. (2007). Customer experience, organizational culture, and the employer brand. Journalof'BrandManagement, 15(2), 123-134.
  • O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492.
  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129-141.
  • Pathardikar, A. D., Sahu, S., & Maurya, K. K., (2013). Leadership and employer branding: Where do employee engagement and psychological attachment stand? Tenth. AIMS International Conference on.
  • Paul, A. K., & Anantharaman, R N. (2004). Influence of HRM practices on organizational commitment: A study among software professionals in India. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 77-88.
  • Porter, L. W, Steers, R M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 5 9(5),603.
  • Purang, P. (2011). Organisational justice and affective commitment: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 141-156.
  • Robinson, S.L., & Rousseau, D.M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245-259.
  • Rotondi, T. (1975). Organizational identification: Issues and implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 95-109.
  • Rousseau, D.M. (1998). The problem of the psychological contract considered. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 665-671.
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology,21(1),600-619.
  • Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: Anew look at the interface between non-work and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518.
  • Staniuliene, S. (2007). Estimation of organizing function performing in Lithuanian companies. Organizaciju Vadyba: Sisteminiai Tyrimai, 43,149-162.
  • Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46-56.
  • Sullivan, J. (2004). Eight elements of a successful employment brand. ER Daily. February 23.
  • Taplin, I. M., & Winterton, J. (2007). The importance of management style in labor retention. International Journal of Sociology andSocialPolicy, 27(1-2), 5-18.
  • Tsui, A. S., Egan, T D., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37,549-579.

Abstract Views: 188

PDF Views: 0




  • Employer Branding and Employee Engagement Influencing Psychological Attachment

Abstract Views: 188  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kamlesh Kumar Maurya
Personnel Management & Industrial Relations, Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP, India

Abstract


Present paper aimed to examine the role of employer branding and employee engagement in influencing the level of psychological attachment among the employee. Guiding theories underlying the present study are social exchange theory (Eisenberger et al., 1997) and the psychological contract theory (Miller, 2001; Rousseau, 1995; Robinson & Rousseau, 1994). Keeping in mind the cost-effective and strategic approach based on general HRM/OB/HRD principles in creating the positive work attitude among the workforce. The present study had investigated the underlying assumption, that high level of engagement and perceived employer branding by the employees' is responsible for, fostering the psychological attachment among employees. This study was conducted by critical review of previous survey results and of literature incorporating (corporate branding, internal branding, employee engagement, psychological attachment, human resource management & employee retention) in terms of their implications for the proposed framework i.e. employee engagement and employer branding is positively associated with psychological attachment. After exploring and critical review of literature incorporating psychological attachment, employer branding, and employee engagement it is found that although much research has been conducted in all areas, few studies have explicitly worked on psychological attachment and its relationship with perceived employer branding and employee engagement. The framework established in the study opens the doors of further investigation into other factors that seem to contribute in building psychological attachment.

Keywords


Employer Branding, Employee Engagement, Psychological Attachment.

References