IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development and Validation of a Psychometric Scale for Assessing Interpersonal Competence of Managers


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, DAV PG. College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of the paper is to present the processes undertaken to evaluate the psychometric properties of interpersonal competence scale (ICS), developed and validated for measuring interpersonal competence of managers. Interpersonal competence is an important variable that play pivotal role in different areas of human-life and to examine its importance in organizational milieu a psychological tool is necessary. This scale consists of 40 items before standardization. Responses were taken from 250 mangers of first level working in different subsidiaries of Coal India Limited (CIL), India using self-report measure method as a locus of measurement. Content and face validity, construct validity using exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha correlation coefficient were used for validation and standardization of the interpersonal competence scale. Four items were dropped due to poor item-total correlation; five items were dropped due to less loading than .40 while two items were dropped because they were having cross loadings. The results of exploratory factor analysis revealed remaining 29 items are loaded on five factors (providing emotional support, conflict resolution, asserting influence, self-disclosure, & initiating relationship) and explain 48.6 % of total variance in interpersonal competence construct. The results of reliability analysis indicate that Cronbach's alpha is .905 for standardized 29 items of interpersonal competence scale and thus reliability is good and acceptable for newly developed scale. Findings of this paper suggest that this interpersonal competence scale is a valid and reliable research tool which can be used to a wider population of mangers working in different organizations.

Keywords

Interpersonal Competence, Reliability, Construct Validity.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2005). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS12 and 13: A guide for social scientists. East Sussex, UK: Routledge.

  • Buhrmester, D., Furman, W., Wittenberg, M. T, & Reis, H. T (1988). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55,991-1008.

  • Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30,625-648

  • Carpenter, B. N. (1987, August). Development, structure, and concurrent validity of the relational competence scale. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY.

  • Carpenter, B. N. (1993).Relational competence. In D. Perlman and W. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 4, pp. 128). New York: JessicaKingsley

  • Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socio-emotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54,165-181.

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 7,245-276.

  • Cedefop (2014). Terminology ofEuropean education and trainingpolicy: A selection of 130 key terms (2nd ed.). Luxembourg: Publications Office.

  • Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375-390.

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 19.

  • Cummings, J. A., Hayes, A. M., Cohen, L. H., Laurenceau, J. P., Saint, D. S., & Gricol, K. (2013). Interpersonal competence and daily stress generation in individuals with avoidant personality disorder symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(2), 135-158.

  • Davis, M. H., & Kraus, L. A. (1991). Dispositional empathy and personal relationships. In W. H. Jones andD. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 75-115). London: JessicaKingsley Publishers.

  • Delaney, C. (2005). The spirituality scale: Development and psychometric testing of a holistic instrument to assess the human spiritual dimension. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 23(2), 145-167.

  • DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., & Kostas-Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39,155-164.

  • Dozois, D. J. A., Martin, R. A., & Bieling, P. J. (2009). Early maladaptive schemas and adaptive/maladaptive styles of humor. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 585- 596.

  • Eberhart, N. K., & Hammen, C. L. (2006). Interpersonal predictors of onset of depression during the transition to adulthood. Personal Relationships, 13,195-206

  • Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 89-97.

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T, MacCallum, R. C, Strahan, E. J. (1999).Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods, 3, 272-299.

  • Ferris, G. R., Perrewe, P. L., & Douglas, C. (2002). Social effectiveness in organizations: Construct validity and research directions. Journal ofLeadership and Organizational Studies, 9,49-63.

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage publications.

  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage publications.

  • Fitts, S. D., Sebby, R. A., & Zlokovich, M. S. (2009). Humor styles as mediators of the shyness-loneliness relationship. North American Journal of Psychology, 11,251-212.

  • Frisbie, S. H., Fitzpatrick, H., Feng, D., & Crawford, D. (2000). Women's personality traits, interpersonal competence and affection for dating partners: A test of the contextual model. Social Behavior and Personality, 28(6), 585-594.

  • Hair, J. F, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Haladyna, T. (1999).Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum

  • Herzberg, D. S., Hammen, C, Burge, D., Daley, S. E., Davila, J., & Lindberg, N. (1998). Social competence as a predictor of chronic interpersonal stress. Personal Relationships, 5,207-218.

  • Hinken, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967-988.

  • Hoglund, W. L. G., Lalonde, C. E., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2008). Social-cognitive competence, peer rejection and neglect, and behavioral and emotional problems in middle childhood. Social Development, 17,528-553.

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30,179-185.

  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods ofmeta-analysis: Correcting errors and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Kaiser, H.F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.

  • Kane, M. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement^ 38,319-342.

  • Kane, M. (2006). Validation. InR. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17-64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.

  • Kim, Y., Pilkonis, P. A., & Barkham, M. (1997). Confirmatory factor analysis of the personality-disorder subscales from the inventory of interpersonal problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, (59(2), 284-296.

  • Lamke, L. K., Sollie, D. L., Durbin, R G., & Fitzpatrick, J. A. (1994). Masculinity, femininity and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of interpersonal competence. Journalof'SocialandPersonalRelationships, 77,535-554.

  • Lipton, D. N., & Nelson, R O. (1980). The contribution of initiation behavior to dating frequency: Behavior Therapy, 11, 59-67.

  • Lynn, M. R (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382-385.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A source book of new methods (2nded.). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

  • Muralidharan, A., Sheets, E. S., Madsen, J., Craighead, L. W., & Craighead, E. (2010). Interpersonal competence across domains: relevance to personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, -25(1), 1627.

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Nunnally, J. C. (91 $). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Nunnally, J. C, & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Patil, V., Singh, S., Mishra, S., & Donavan, D. (2008). Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the "eigenvalue greater than one" criterion. Journal of Business Research, 61,162-170.

  • Price, J. L. & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.

  • Reijntjes, A., Stegge, H., Terwogt, M. M., Kamphuis, J. H., & Telch, M. J. (2006). Children's coping with in vivo rejection: An experimental investigation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34,877-889.

  • Riggio, R. E., & Taylor, S. J. (2000). Personality and communication skills as predictors of hospice nurse performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 75,347-355.

  • Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Rychen, D. S., & Salganik L. H. (Eds.) (2001). Definingandselecting key competencies. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.

  • Seal, C. R, Miguel, K., Alzamil, A., Naumann, S. E., Royce-Davis, J., & Drost, D. (2015). Personal interpersonal competence assessment: A self-report instrument for student development. Research in Higher Education, 27,1-10.

  • Segrin, C. (2001). Interpersonal processes in psychological problems. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Skodol, A. E., Pagano, M. E., Bender, Shea, M. T., Gunderson, J. G., Yen, S., Stout, R. I., & Mcglashan, T. H. (2005). Stability of functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive compulsive personality disorder over two years. Psychological Medicine, 35,443-451.

  • Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.

  • Takai, J., & Ota, H. (1994). Assessing Japanese interpersonal communication competence. Japanese Journalof'ExperimentalSocialPsychology, 33(3), 224-236.

  • Trochim, W.M.K. (2001). The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog.

  • Zumbo,B.D., Gadermann,A. M.,&Zeisser, C. (2007).Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6,21-29.


Abstract Views: 304

PDF Views: 0




  • Development and Validation of a Psychometric Scale for Assessing Interpersonal Competence of Managers

Abstract Views: 304  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Vinod Kumar Gupta
Department of Psychology, DAV PG. College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
A. P. Singh
Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


The purpose of the paper is to present the processes undertaken to evaluate the psychometric properties of interpersonal competence scale (ICS), developed and validated for measuring interpersonal competence of managers. Interpersonal competence is an important variable that play pivotal role in different areas of human-life and to examine its importance in organizational milieu a psychological tool is necessary. This scale consists of 40 items before standardization. Responses were taken from 250 mangers of first level working in different subsidiaries of Coal India Limited (CIL), India using self-report measure method as a locus of measurement. Content and face validity, construct validity using exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha correlation coefficient were used for validation and standardization of the interpersonal competence scale. Four items were dropped due to poor item-total correlation; five items were dropped due to less loading than .40 while two items were dropped because they were having cross loadings. The results of exploratory factor analysis revealed remaining 29 items are loaded on five factors (providing emotional support, conflict resolution, asserting influence, self-disclosure, & initiating relationship) and explain 48.6 % of total variance in interpersonal competence construct. The results of reliability analysis indicate that Cronbach's alpha is .905 for standardized 29 items of interpersonal competence scale and thus reliability is good and acceptable for newly developed scale. Findings of this paper suggest that this interpersonal competence scale is a valid and reliable research tool which can be used to a wider population of mangers working in different organizations.

Keywords


Interpersonal Competence, Reliability, Construct Validity.

References