Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
An Analysis of the Law Relating to the Right of Private Defence in India with Special Reference to Retreat Rule in America
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Someone is threatening you with imminent and deadly force. You could safely retreat from the threat but you choose, instead, to stand your ground and meet force by force. In doing so, you kill the aggressor. Are you guilty of murder in America? In most of the United States, the answer is no. By statute, court rulings, or a combination of both, more than thirty states have adopted a 'stand your ground1 i.e., no retreat rule which bars the prosecution of people who use deadly force against a deadly aggressor without first attempting to retreat, or offers such persons a valid self- defence claim against a charge of criminal homicide. By contrast, a minority of states enforce a retreat requirement under which a defendant may not successfully claim self- defence if the defendant could have safely retreated, but did not, before using deadly force against a deadly attacker.
Keywords
Retreat Rule, Stand Your Ground Rule, Castle Rule, Indian Law, Social Purpose.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- AIR 1980 SC 660 at 666
- AIR 1970 SC 1079. See also Munshi Ram v. Delhi Adm. AIR 1968, SC 702 and Krishna v. StateofRajas than. AIR 1962 SC
- Blackstone, Commentaries on The Law of England, (1830), p. 185
- John D. Mayne, The Criminal Law of India, (1904), p. 460
- Laney v. United States, 54App. D.C. at 58-59,294 F. at 414-15 (1923)
- CrLJ661at665(SC)
- Sanford H. Kadish, Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice, Vol. Ill, New York, (1983), p. 949
- The American Law Ins titu.te,ModelPenal Code, (1962)
Abstract Views: 296
PDF Views: 0