IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Counter-Stereotypical Stories: A Strategy for Overcoming Disability Stereotypes?


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Portrayals of disability are almost entirely absent in media, and those few that do existrenearly always heavily stereotyped. Through repeated exposure, the stereotypes become largely automatic overtime and lead to formation of implicit and explicit disability attitudes. The study engaged college students (16 Males & 16 Females) in a lexical decision task (Meyer & Schvaneveldt, 1971, 1976) which yields a measure of associative strength between two words (e.g., Impairment: Lazy; Impairment: Efficient). The study aimed to investigate whether counterstereotypical disability associations are activated as an effect of priming task (presentation of a counterstereotypical story). The experimental group was presented with the counter-stereotypical story (priming task) and the lexical decision task and the word recognition. The control group only completed the lexical decision task and word recognition (The priming task was absent for the control condition). The lexical task was presented using Inquisit 5 software (2016) and the response times for category associates (counter-stereotypical associates, e.g., Impairment: Efficient) and neutral associates (e.g., Impairment: Circle) were stored. Mann-Whitney-U-Test was used to test the hypotheses, for which SPSS was used. No significant difference was found between the mean response time of category words associates versus neutral words associates for experimental group, and the mean response time of category words associates for the experimental and control group. Further, there was no significant difference in the mean frequencies of neutral and category words recognized in experimental groups, and the mean frequencies of category words recognized in experimental versus control group.

Keywords

Disability, Experiment, Lexical Task, Priming, Stereotypes.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ball, P., Monaco, G., & Schmeling, J. (2005). Disability and diversity in fortune 100 companies. Behavioral Science Law, 23, 97-121.

  • Barnes, C. (1992). Disabling imagery and the media. England: The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People.

  • Barnes, C., Mercer, G., & Shakespeare, T. (1999). Exploring disability. A sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Barton, L. (2001). Discourses of disability in the digest. Journal of Rhetoric Culture and Politics, 21(3), 555-581.

  • Bayle, N. (2002). Determinants of the employers' behaviour towards disabled workers. Les Cahiers Internationaux de PsychologieSociale, 54, 84-101.

  • Blaxter, M. (1976). The meaning of disability: A sociological study of impairment. London: Heinemann.

  • Carroll, P. S., & Rosenblum, L. P. (2000). Through their eyes: Are characters visual impairment portrayed realistically in young adult literature? Journal with of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(7), 620-631.

  • Clogston, J.S. (1990). Disability coverage in 16 newspapers. Louisville, KY: Advocado.

  • Corbella, M. B., & Acevedo, M. S. G. (2010). The representation of people with visual impairment in films. Journal of Medicine and Cinema, 6(2), 69-77.

  • Dawn, R. (2013). The politics of cinematic representation of disability: The psychiatricgaze. Disability and Rehabilitation Journal, 36(6), 515-520. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline. com/toc/idre20/current.

  • Elliot, T.R., & Byrd, E.K. (1982). Media and disability. Rehabilitation Literature, 43(11-12), 348-355.

  • Fiedler, K., Walther, E., & Nickel, S. (1999). The auto-verification of social hypotheses: Stereotyping and the power of sample size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 5-18.

  • Ghai, A. (2015). Rethinking Disability in India. India: Routldge.

  • Graesser, A., Woll, S., Kowalsk, D., & Smith, D. (1980). Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 503-515.

  • Hunt, P. (1991). Discrimination: Disabled people and the media. Winter, 70, 45-48.

  • Katz, I., Glass, D.C., Lucido, D.J., & Farber, J. (1979). Harm-doing and the victim's racial or orthopaedic stigma as determinants of helping behavior. Journal of Personality, 47, 340-364.

  • Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S. A., Cerruti, C., Shin, J. E. L., Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Frazier, R.S. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1765.

  • Louvet, E. (2007). Social judgment toward job applicants with disabilities: Perception of personal qualities and competences. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52, 297-303.

  • MacMilan, S. (2003). Visual disabilities and folklore: Analysis of selected tales plus their possible uses with children. (Unpublished Dissertation). Bell State University, Indiana.

  • Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227.

  • Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1976). Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes. Science, 192(4234), 27-33.

  • Mohapatra, A. (2012). Portrayal of disability in Hindi cinema: A study of emerging trends of differently-abled. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 1(7), 124-132.

  • Nario-Redmond, M. R. (2010). Cultural stereotypes of disabled and non-disabled men and women: Consensus for global category representations and diagnostic domains. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 471-488.

  • Norden, M. F. (1994). The cinema of isolation: A history of physical disability in the movies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University press.

  • Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (2004). Stereotypes: Content, structures, processes, and context. In M. B. Brewer and M. Hewstone (Eds.), Social cognition (pp. 120-141). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Ozawa, A., & Yaeda, J. (2007). Employer attitudes toward employing persons with psychiatric disability in Japan. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26,105 113.

  • Quinlan, M.M., & Bates, B.R. (2010). Are our president learning? Unpacking the enthymematic connections in the speech mistakes of president George W. Bush. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10(1), 312.

  • Ramasubramanian, S. (2007). Media-based strategies to reduce racial stereotypes activated by news stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 249-264.

  • Ravaud, J. F., Madiot, B., & Ville, I. (1992). Discrimination towards disabled people seeking employment. Social Science and Medicine, 35, 951-958.

  • Rohmer, O., & Louvet, E. (2004). Familiarity and affective reactions toward people with a physical disability. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57, 165-170.

  • Rohmer, O., & Louvet, E. (2011). Stereotype content of disability subgroups: Testing predictions of the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. L'AnnĂ©e Psychologique, 111, 69-85.

  • Srull, T. K., & Wyer, Jr.R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.

  • Stern, L. D., Marrs, S., Millar, M. G., & Cole, E. (1984). Processing time and the recall of inconsistent and consistent behaviors of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 253- 262.

  • Stewart, B. D., & Payne, B. K. (2008). Bringing automatic stereotyping under control: Implementation intentions as efficient means of thought control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1332-1345.

  • Weinberg, N., & Santana, R. (1978). Comic books: Champions of the disabled stereotype. Rehabilitation Literature, 39(11-12), 327-331.

  • Woodley, A., & Metzger, N. (2012). Employer attitudes towards employing disabled people. New Zealand: Ministry of Social Development.

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Enriching psychological research on disability. In D. F. Thomas and F. E. Menz (Eds.), Bridging gaps: Refining the disability research agenda for rehabilitation and the social sciences-conference proceedings. Menomonie: University of Wisconsin-Stout, Stout Vocational Rehabilitation Institute, Research and Training Centre.


Abstract Views: 276

PDF Views: 0




  • Counter-Stereotypical Stories: A Strategy for Overcoming Disability Stereotypes?

Abstract Views: 276  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Riya Sharma
Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Sabreen Kaur
Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Soumya Sharma
Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Abstract


Portrayals of disability are almost entirely absent in media, and those few that do existrenearly always heavily stereotyped. Through repeated exposure, the stereotypes become largely automatic overtime and lead to formation of implicit and explicit disability attitudes. The study engaged college students (16 Males & 16 Females) in a lexical decision task (Meyer & Schvaneveldt, 1971, 1976) which yields a measure of associative strength between two words (e.g., Impairment: Lazy; Impairment: Efficient). The study aimed to investigate whether counterstereotypical disability associations are activated as an effect of priming task (presentation of a counterstereotypical story). The experimental group was presented with the counter-stereotypical story (priming task) and the lexical decision task and the word recognition. The control group only completed the lexical decision task and word recognition (The priming task was absent for the control condition). The lexical task was presented using Inquisit 5 software (2016) and the response times for category associates (counter-stereotypical associates, e.g., Impairment: Efficient) and neutral associates (e.g., Impairment: Circle) were stored. Mann-Whitney-U-Test was used to test the hypotheses, for which SPSS was used. No significant difference was found between the mean response time of category words associates versus neutral words associates for experimental group, and the mean response time of category words associates for the experimental and control group. Further, there was no significant difference in the mean frequencies of neutral and category words recognized in experimental groups, and the mean frequencies of category words recognized in experimental versus control group.

Keywords


Disability, Experiment, Lexical Task, Priming, Stereotypes.

References