IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study on How Hindi Press Enhancing the Development of Society


Affiliations
1 Centre for Culture, Media and Governance, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


I seek to shed light on how the process of growth and development of society enhanced by Hindi press. In this paper I am going to compare two approaches with same resultant that how the emergence of Hindi press helped and democratise the marginalised people (Hindi speaking people). The comparison reveals the two approaches are complementary in some ways. One approach is inspired by the philosopher Jürgen Habermas's concepts of communicative action, and the making of public sphere and the second approach is inspired by Stuart Hall's, “How does the ideological processes work and what are it's mechanism?” In this paper I am also trying to show the ways in which how the emergence of Hindi news paper helped to connect diverse social group in a network and helped in strengthening of Indian democracy. I will explain how I think Habermas's concepts are related to social development then describe role of Hindi press in social protest.

Keywords

Hindi Press, Development, Social Control, Marginalised People.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Agrawal, B.C. (1978). Television comes to villages: An evaluation of SITE. A ISRO Report, Bangalore, Karnatak.

  • Agrwal, C.K., & Mallick, M.R. (1986). Television in Khed: A social evaluation of SITE. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

  • Ambiranjan, S. (2000), Globalisation, media, culture. Economic Political Weekly, 35(25), 17-23.

  • Bhagat, R., & Mathur, P.N. (1989). Mass media and farm women. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company, pp. 66-70.

  • Debra, S. (1993). Anthropology and mass media, annual review of anthropology. Department of Anthropology, Emorey University, 22, 293-315.

  • Dua, M.R., & Gupta, V.S. (1994). Television and its impact on rural areas: A Doordarshan study. New Delhi: Media and Development, Har Anand Publications.

  • Gargi, B. (1991). Folk Theatre of India Communication-200 A.D. New Delhi: Indian Institute of Mass Communication.

  • Ginsburg, F. (1994). Culture/media: A (Mild) polemic. Anthropology Today, 10(2), 5-15.

  • Ginsburg, F. (2002). Mediating culture: Indigenous media, ethnographic film, and the production of identity. In K. Askew and R.R. Wilk (Eds.), Anthropology of media: A ready. Black Well Publishing.

  • Golding, P. (1974). Media role in national development: Critique of a theoretical orthodoxy. Journal of Communication, Summer edition, 1, 39-50.

  • Harris, R.J. (1989). A cognitive psychology of mass communication. Hillsdale, NJ, Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  • Hartmann, P., Patil, B.R., & Dighe, A. (Eds.) (1989). The mass media and village life: An Indian study. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

  • Jain, R. (2003). Communicating rural development-strategy and alternatives. New Delhi: Concept Publishing House, pp. 235-238.

  • Johnson, K. (2001). Media and social change: The modernizing influences of television in rural India. Media, Culture and Society, 23(2), 147-169.

  • Jones, G.S. (1995). Understanding community in the information age. New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp.1-10.

  • Jones, P.J. (2006). A cultural approach to the study of mediated citizenship. Social Semiotics, 16(2), 365–383.

  • Joshi, V. (2002). Religion, Media and Globalisation. Jaipur, New Delhi: Rawat Publication, pp. 189-200.

  • Kumar, H. (2006). Folk media and rural development, Indian media studies. Journal, Indian Institute of Mass Communication, New Delhi, 1, 3-17.

  • Long, N. (1977). An introduction to sociology of rural development. London: Live stocks.

  • Mahajan, K. (1990). Communication and Society. New Delhi: Classical Publishing Company.

  • Marceau, F.J. (1972). Communication and development: A Reconstruction. Public opinion Quarterly, Oxford University Press, Vol.36, No.2.

  • Mazzarela, W. (2004). Culture, globalization, mediation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 345–367.

  • Mehta, S.R., & Mohan, J. (1992). Communication and Development: Some psychological considerations. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.

  • Modi, I. (1985). Leisure, mass media and social structure. New Delhi: Rawat Publications, pp. 274-75.

  • Ottawa, R. (1990). Communicating Radio: What do we know? Kanada: African Farm Radio Research Initiative.

  • Paliwala, R.K. (1987). Impediments to rural communication. Meerut, U.P.: Research India Publication, pp. 165-68.

  • Palmer, R.J. (1965). Theories of social change and mass media, historic exemplars of teaching method. London: Oxford Publications Ltd.

  • Pati, J. (2004). Media and tribal development. New Delhi: Concept publishing company.

  • Rao, B.S.S. (1992). Television for Rural Development. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

  • Rao, B.S.V. (2006). A study of mass media access, exposure and preferences of the tribes towards adult education and in Vishakapatanam tribal region. Journal of Communication Studies, 5, 1-2.

  • Riber, W. R. (1989). The individual, communication and society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rothenbuhler, E.W. (2006). Media anthropology as a field of interdisciplinary contact, paper presented at department of communication. Texas A & M University, Texas.

  • Roy, P., Fedrie, & Roggers (2000). Mass Media and Rural Development. New Delhi: Sage Publications Ltd.

  • Rao, Y.V.L. (1989). Communication and minneapolis development: A study of two Indian villages. Minneapolis: University of Minchesota press.

  • Schramm, W. (1964). Mass Media and National Development. California: Stanford University Press.

  • Singh, B. (2007). Tribal Scenario in the context of economic liberalisation and globalisation, Indian Journal of Public Administration, 53(4), 759-766.

  • Singh, R. (2009). Development communication and media strategy. Third Concept, 23(265), 15-16.

  • Subhramanyam, B., & Rammohan, K.R. (2006). Mass media and tribal life: A study in Vishakha agency area. Anthropologist, 8(2), 75-81.

  • Tachhi, J. (2002). Nostalogia, Radio listening and everyday life. Media@lse, London School of Economics and Political Science.

  • Trivedi, H. (1998). Mass media and new horizons, impact on TV and video on urban milieau. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.

  • Walters, T. et al. (2005). Media life among gen Zeds. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 81, 63-68. London: Sage Publications.


Abstract Views: 255

PDF Views: 0




  • A Study on How Hindi Press Enhancing the Development of Society

Abstract Views: 255  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Seema Bharti
Centre for Culture, Media and Governance, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India

Abstract


I seek to shed light on how the process of growth and development of society enhanced by Hindi press. In this paper I am going to compare two approaches with same resultant that how the emergence of Hindi press helped and democratise the marginalised people (Hindi speaking people). The comparison reveals the two approaches are complementary in some ways. One approach is inspired by the philosopher Jürgen Habermas's concepts of communicative action, and the making of public sphere and the second approach is inspired by Stuart Hall's, “How does the ideological processes work and what are it's mechanism?” In this paper I am also trying to show the ways in which how the emergence of Hindi news paper helped to connect diverse social group in a network and helped in strengthening of Indian democracy. I will explain how I think Habermas's concepts are related to social development then describe role of Hindi press in social protest.

Keywords


Hindi Press, Development, Social Control, Marginalised People.

References