Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Congestion Aware Packet Routing for Delay Sensitive Cloud Communications


Affiliations
1 School of Informatics & Innovative Systems, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science & Technology, Kenya
 

In the recent years, many organizations have turned to cloud technology to support their information technology services. The cloud servers are therefore increasingly holding huge and sensitive information belonging to diverse groups of individuals and companies. Additionally, some organizations employ the cloud to provide them with online backup services. One of the most outstanding requirements for cloud customers is availability – the customers must be able to access their information and other resources stored in the cloud any time and from anywhere on the globe. This means that there should be efficient network design such that any delays are averted. The connection between the customer and the cloud can therefore be regarded as delay senstive. Network congestions often lead to delays and packet losses. Transmission control protocol employs four congestion control algorithms – slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit and fast recovery, all of which fail to meet the requirements of delay intolerance. Transmission control protocol pacing has been suggested as a possible solution to delays and packet dropping in computer networks. However, the conventional pacing is static in nature, meaning that constant pauses are introduced between packet transmissions to prevent bursty transmissions which can lead to delays at the receiver buffers. This paper therefore presents a congestion aware packet routing where the delay period is hinged on the prevailing network conditions. This dynamic pacing algorithm was designed and implemented in Spyder using Python programming language. It employed probe signals to gather network intelligence such as the applicable round trip times of the network. Thereafter, this network intelligence was employed to tailor the paces to these network conditions. The results obtained showed that this algorithm introduced longer paces when more packets are transmitted and shorter paces when few packets are transmitted. In so doing, this new algorithm gives enough time for large packets to be delivered and smaller paces when few packets are sent. The analysis was done in terms of bandwidth utilization efficiency, round trip times and congestion window size adjustments. The congestion window – time graphs and throughput – time graphs showed that the developed dynamic pacing algorithm adjusted quickly to network congestions hence ensuring that the network is efficiently utilized by averting delays

Keywords

Cloud Computing, Congestion, Network Delays, Algorithm, TCP Pacing.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Nouh, May Sayed A., et al. "Enhanced Route Discovery Mechanism of Ad-Hoc On Demand Distance Vector for MANET." International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA) 3.6: 129-138, 2016, DOI: 10.22247/ijcna/2016/48904
  • N. Tanida, M. Inaba, and K. Hiraki, “Adaptive auto-tuning of TCP pacingâ€, The University of Tokyo, Hongo Bunkyo Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1-14, 2015.
  • A. Aggarwal, S. Savage, and T. Anderson, “Understanding the Performance of TCP Pacingâ€, Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington Seattle, pp. 1-9, 2015.
  • A.Nabil, T. Patrick, K. Robert, N. Vijay, M. Thomas, and B. Arkady, “ Secure and Resilient Cloud Computing for the Department of Defenseâ€, Lincoln Laboratory Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 123-135, 2016.
  • D. Sakhuja & A. Shukla, “Cloud Computingâ€, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 1-7, 2013.
  • B. Dennis, “Impact of Virtualization on Data Center Physical Infrastructureâ€, The Green grid, Vol. 27, pp. 1-10, 2010.
  • S. Karolj, D. Davor, A. Enis, S. Ivan, S. Zorislav, “Scalable Distributed Computing Hierarchy: Cloud, Fog and Dew Computingâ€, Open Journal of Cloud Computing, Vol. 2 (1), pp. 16–24, 2015.
  • M. Haghighat, S. Zonouz & M. Abdel-Mottaleb, “CloudID: Trustworthy Cloud-based and Cross-Enterprise Biometric Identificationâ€, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, No. 21, pp. 7905–7916, 2015.
  • C. Lehmann, “ Hybrid multi-cloud architecture, and the vendors aiming to enable and manage itâ€, 451 Research, LLC, pp. 1-6, 2016.
  • M. Duke, R. Braden, W. Eddy, E. Blanton & A. Zimmermann, “A Roadmap for Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Specification Documentsâ€, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), pp. 1-57, 2015.
  • M. Ghobadi and Y. Ganjali, “TCP Pacing in Data Center Networksâ€, IEEE 21st Annual Symposium on High-Performance Interconnects, pp. 1-8, 2013.
  • K. Chaubey and P. Mistri, “An Encounter Based Routing in Delay Tolerant Network (DTN): A Hybrid Approachâ€, International Journal Of Innovative Research In Computer And Communication Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue 5, pp. 8657 - 8662 , 2016. DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2016. 0405085.
  • N. Dayanand and A. Vidhate, “Improved Routing Protocol for Delay Tolerant Networkâ€, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, Vol. 6, Issue 4, pp. 688- 691, 2016.
  • S. Islam and M. Welzl, “Start Me Up: Determining and Sharing TCP’s Initial Congestion Windowâ€, ACM, pp. 1-3, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2959424.2959440.
  • Rohini, G., and A. Srinivasan. "Dynamic Transition of Bandwidth and Power Saving Mechanism to Support Multimedia Streaming Using H. 264/SVC over the Wireless Networks." International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications 2.2 (2015): 57-63.
  • Merlyn, A. Anuba, and A. Anuja Merlyn. "Energy Efficient Routing (EER) For Reducing Congestion and Time Delay in Wireless Sensor Network." International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications 1.1 (2014): 1-10.
  • N. Hanford, B. Tierney and D. Ghosal, “Optimizing Data Transfer Nodes using Packet Pacingâ€, ACM, pp. 1-8, 2015, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2830318.2830322.
  • Y. Cai, Y. Sinan and T. Wolf, “Practical Packet Pacing in Small-Buffer Networksâ€, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Massachusetts, pp. 1-6, 2016.
  • F. Gratzer, “QUIC - Quick UDP Internet Connectionsâ€, Seminars FI / IITM SS 16, Network Architectures and Services, pp. 36-46, 2016, DOI: 10.2313/NET-2016-09-1_06.
  • W. Wang, L.Huang, C. Li, and X. Wang, “TCP-polite rate control based on cooperative measurementâ€, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Vol. 9, Issue 9 , pp. 899–909 ,2013, DOI: 10.1002/sec.901.

Abstract Views: 273

PDF Views: 3




  • Congestion Aware Packet Routing for Delay Sensitive Cloud Communications

Abstract Views: 273  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

Vincent O. Nyangaresi
School of Informatics & Innovative Systems, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science & Technology, Kenya
Silvance O. Abeka
School of Informatics & Innovative Systems, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science & Technology, Kenya
Solomon. O. Ogara
School of Informatics & Innovative Systems, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science & Technology, Kenya

Abstract


In the recent years, many organizations have turned to cloud technology to support their information technology services. The cloud servers are therefore increasingly holding huge and sensitive information belonging to diverse groups of individuals and companies. Additionally, some organizations employ the cloud to provide them with online backup services. One of the most outstanding requirements for cloud customers is availability – the customers must be able to access their information and other resources stored in the cloud any time and from anywhere on the globe. This means that there should be efficient network design such that any delays are averted. The connection between the customer and the cloud can therefore be regarded as delay senstive. Network congestions often lead to delays and packet losses. Transmission control protocol employs four congestion control algorithms – slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit and fast recovery, all of which fail to meet the requirements of delay intolerance. Transmission control protocol pacing has been suggested as a possible solution to delays and packet dropping in computer networks. However, the conventional pacing is static in nature, meaning that constant pauses are introduced between packet transmissions to prevent bursty transmissions which can lead to delays at the receiver buffers. This paper therefore presents a congestion aware packet routing where the delay period is hinged on the prevailing network conditions. This dynamic pacing algorithm was designed and implemented in Spyder using Python programming language. It employed probe signals to gather network intelligence such as the applicable round trip times of the network. Thereafter, this network intelligence was employed to tailor the paces to these network conditions. The results obtained showed that this algorithm introduced longer paces when more packets are transmitted and shorter paces when few packets are transmitted. In so doing, this new algorithm gives enough time for large packets to be delivered and smaller paces when few packets are sent. The analysis was done in terms of bandwidth utilization efficiency, round trip times and congestion window size adjustments. The congestion window – time graphs and throughput – time graphs showed that the developed dynamic pacing algorithm adjusted quickly to network congestions hence ensuring that the network is efficiently utilized by averting delays

Keywords


Cloud Computing, Congestion, Network Delays, Algorithm, TCP Pacing.

References