Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Jayaraj, D.
- AFSORP: Adaptive Fish Swarm Optimization-Based Routing Protocol for Mobility Enabled Wireless Sensor Network
Abstract Views :119 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamalai University, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Computer Science and Applications, Sankara College of Science and Commerce, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
4 Department of Computer and Information Science, Annamalai University, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamalai University, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Computer Science and Applications, Sankara College of Science and Commerce, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
4 Department of Computer and Information Science, Annamalai University, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, Vol 10, No 1 (2023), Pagination: 119-129Abstract
Advances in information and communication technology and electronics have led to a surge in interest in mobility-enabled wireless sensor networks (MEWSN). These minuscule sensor nodes collect data, process it, and then transmit it via a radio frequency channel to a central station or sink. Most of the time, MEWSNs are placed in hazardous or difficult-to-access locations. To increase the lifespan of a network, available resources must be utilized as efficiently as possible. The whole network connection collapses if even one node loses power, rendering the deployment's goals moot. Therefore, much MEWSN research has focused on energy efficiency, with energy-efficient routing protocols being a key component. This paper proposes an Adaptive Fish Swarm Optimization-based Routing Protocol (AFSORP) for identifying the best route in MEWSN. AFSORP functions based on the natural characteristics of fish. The two most important steps in AFSORP are chasing and blocking, which respectively seek the optimal route and choose the appropriate route to send data from the source node to the destination node. Standard network performance measurements are used to assess AFSORP with the help of the GNS3 simulator. The results show that AFSORP performs better than the existing routing methods.Keywords
Routing, Mobility, WSN, MEWSN, Optimization, Fish, Energy.Full Text
References
- F. R. Mughal et al., “A new Asymmetric Link Quality Routing protocol (ALQR) for heterogeneous WSNs,” Microprocess. Microsyst., vol. 93, p. 104617, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2022.104617.
- R. Kumar, S. Shekhar, H. Garg, M. Kumar, B. Sharma, and S. Kumar, “EESR: Energy efficient sector-based routing protocol for reliable data communication in UWSNs,” Comput. Commun., vol. 192, pp. 268–278, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2022.06.011.
- H. Li, S. Wang, Q. Chen, M. Gong, and L. Chen, “IPSMT: Multi-objective optimization of multipath transmission strategy based on improved immune particle swarm algorithm in wireless sensor networks,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 121, p. 108705, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108705.
- Z. Guo and H. Chen, “A reinforcement learning-based sleep scheduling algorithm for cooperative computing in event-driven wireless sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 130, p. 102837, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.102837.
- S. Mavinkattimath and R. Khanai, “A low power and high-speed hardware accelerator for Wireless Body Sensor Network (WBSN),” Mater. Today Proc., 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.013.
- J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Performance Modeling of Bio-Inspired Routing Protocols in Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc Network to Reduce End-to-End Delay,” Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 221–231, 2019, doi: 10.22266/ijies2019.0228.22.
- J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Multi-Adaptive Routing Protocol for Internet of Things based Ad-hoc Networks,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 887–909, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021-08495-z.
- R. Jaganathan and R. Vadivel, “Intelligent Fish Swarm Inspired Protocol (IFSIP) for Dynamic Ideal Routing in Cognitive Radio Ad-Hoc Networks,” Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1063–1074, 2021, doi: 10.12785/ijcds/100196.
- A. Behura and M. R. Kabat, “Chapter 13 - Optimization-based energy-efficient routing scheme for wireless body area network,” in Cognitive Data Science in Sustainable Computing, S. Mishra, H. K. Tripathy, P. K. Mallick, A. K. Sangaiah, and G.-S. B. T.-C. B. D. I. with a M. A. Chae, Eds. Academic Press, 2022, pp. 279–303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85117-6.00016-9.
- M. F. Carsancakli, M. A. Al Imran, H. U. Yildiz, A. Kara, and B. Tavli, “Reliability of linear WSNs: A complementary overview and analysis of impact of cascaded failures on network lifetime,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 131, p. 102839, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.102839.
- V. Kavitha and K. Ganapathy, “Galactic swarm optimized convolute network and cluster head elected energy-efficient routing protocol in WSN,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, vol. 52, p. 102154, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102154.
- A. Sundar Raj and M. Chinnadurai, “Energy efficient routing algorithm in wireless body area networks for smart wearable patches,” Comput. Commun., vol. 153, pp. 85–94, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.01.069.
- A. S. Toor and A. K. Jain, “Energy Aware Cluster Based Multi-hop Energy Efficient Routing Protocol using Multiple Mobile Nodes (MEACBM) in Wireless Sensor Networks,” AEU - Int. J. Electron. Commun., vol. 102, pp. 41–53, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2019.02.006.
- J. E. Z. Gbadouissa, A. A. A. Ari, C. Titouna, A. M. Gueroui, and O. Thiare, “HGC: HyperGraph based Clustering scheme for power aware wireless sensor networks,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 105, pp. 175–183, Apr. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.11.043.
- X. Fu, H. Yao, and Y. Yang, “Exploring the invulnerability of wireless sensor networks against cascading failures,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 491, pp. 289–305, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.04.004.
- T. Nath and M. Azharuddin, “Application of wireless sensor networks for Rhino protection against poachers in Kaziranga National Park,” AEU - Int. J. Electron. Commun., vol. 111, p. 152882, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.AEUE.2019.152882.
- A. Bereketli, M. Tümçakır, and B. Yeni, “P-AUV: Position aware routing and medium access for ad hoc AUV networks,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 125, pp. 146–154, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.JNCA.2018.10.014.
- D. Adhikari, D. Datta, and R. Datta, “Impact of BER in fragmentation-aware routing and spectrum assignment in elastic optical networks,” Comput. Networks, vol. 172, p. 107167, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.COMNET.2020.107167.
- J. Liu et al., “QMR:Q-learning based Multi-objective optimization Routing protocol for Flying Ad Hoc Networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 150, pp. 304–316, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.11.011.
- H. Zemrane, Y. Baddi, and A. Hasbi, “Mobile AdHoc networks for Intelligent Transportation System: Comparative Analysis of the Routing protocols,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 160, pp. 758–765, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.014.
- J. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Tang, and Z. Li, “Delay-tolerant routing and message scheduling for CR-VANETs,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 110, pp. 291–309, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.04.026.
- P. Chithaluru, R. Tiwari, and K. Kumar, “AREOR–Adaptive ranking based energy efficient opportunistic routing scheme in Wireless Sensor Network,” Comput. Networks, vol. 162, p. 106863, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.106863.
- Lingaraj M and Prakash A, “Power Aware Routing Protocol (PARP) to Reduce Energy Consumption in Wireless Sensor Networks,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 380–385, Jan. 2019, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v7i5/E1969017519.pdf
- F. Al-Salti, N. Alzeidi, K. Day, and A. Touzene, “An efficient and reliable grid-based routing protocol for UWSNs by exploiting minimum hop count,” Comput. Networks, vol. 162, p. 106869, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.COMNET.2019.106869.
- K. Patil, M. Jafri, D. Fiems, and A. Marin, “Stochastic modeling of depth based routing in underwater sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 89, pp. 132–141, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.03.009.
- B. Chakraborty, S. Verma, and K. P. Singh, “Temporal Differential Privacy in Wireless Sensor Networks,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 155, p. 102548, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102548.
- Minimizing Energy Consumption in Vehicular Sensor Networks Using Relentless Particle Swarm Optimization Routing
Abstract Views :62 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science, Skyline University, NG
2 Department of Computer Science, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Computer Science and Applications, Sankara College of Science and Commerce, Tamil Nadu, IN
4 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, IN
5 Department of Computer and Information Science, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 Department of Computer Science, Skyline University, NG
2 Department of Computer Science, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Computer Science and Applications, Sankara College of Science and Commerce, Tamil Nadu, IN
4 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, IN
5 Department of Computer and Information Science, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, Vol 10, No 2 (2023), Pagination: 217-230Abstract
Increasing traffic issues, particularly in highly populated nations, have prompted recent interest in Vehicular Sensor Networks (VSNETs) from academics in several fields. Accident rates continue to rise, highlighting the need for a highly functional Smart Transport System (STS). Improvements to the STS should not be spread thin across the board but should concentrate on improving traffic flow, maintaining system reliability, and decreasing vehicle carbon dioxide and methane emissions. Current routing protocols for VSNETs consider various scenarios and approaches to provide safe and effective vehicle-to-infrastructure communication. The reliability of vehicle connections during data transmission has not been well explored. This paper proposes a Relentless Particle Swarm Optimization based Routing Protocol (RPSORP) for VSNET to use vehicle kinematics and mobility to identify vehicle location, send routing information packets to road-side devices, and choose the most reliable path for travel. RPSORP optimizes local and global search to minimize energy consumption in VSNET. The RPSORP is evaluated in the GNS3 simulator using Throughput, Packet Delivery, Delay, and Energy Consumption metrics. RPSORP has superior performance than state-of-the-art routing protocols.Keywords
VSNET, Routing, Swarming, PSO, Local-Search, Global-Search.Full Text
References
- H. Khelifi, S. Luo, B. Nour, H. Moungla, S. H. Ahmed, and M. Guizani, “A blockchain-based architecture for secure vehicular Named Data Networks,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 86, p. 106715, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106715.
- O. S. Al-Heety, Z. Zakaria, M. Ismail, M. M. Shakir, S. Alani, and H. Alsariera, “A Comprehensive Survey: Benefits, Services, Recent Works, Challenges, Security, and Use Cases for SDN-VANET,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 91028–91047, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992580.
- M. A. Hossain et al., “Multi-Objective Harris Hawks Optimization Algorithm Based 2-Hop Routing Algorithm for CR-VANET,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 58230–58242, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072922.
- M. Naderi, F. Zargari, and M. Ghanbari, “Adaptive beacon broadcast in opportunistic routing for VANETs,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 86, pp. 119–130, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.11.011.
- M. Lingaraj and A. Prakash, “Power aware routing protocol (PARP) to reduce energy consumption in wireless sensor networks,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 380–385, Jan. 2019, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijrte.org/wpcontent/uploads/papers/v7i5/E1969017519.pdf
- T. N. Sugumar and N. R. Ramasamy, “mDesk: a scalable and reliable hypervisor framework for effective provisioning of resource and downtime reduction,” J. Supercomput., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 1277–1292, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11227-018-2662-5.
- A. J. Kadhim and S. A. H. Seno, “Energy-efficient multicast routing protocol based on SDN and fog computing for vehicular networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 84, pp. 68–81, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.09.018.
- L. Yao, J. Wang, X. Wang, A. Chen, and Y. Wang, “V2X Routing in a VANET Based on the Hidden Markov Model,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 889–899, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2706756.
- K. A. Awan, I. Ud Din, A. Almogren, M. Guizani, and S. Khan, “StabTrust-A Stable and Centralized Trust-Based Clustering Mechanism for IoT Enabled Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 21159–21177, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968948.
- R. Yarinezhad, “Reducing delay and prolonging the lifetime of wireless sensor network using efficient routing protocol based on mobile sink and virtual infrastructure,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 84, pp. 42–55, Mar. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.09.016.
- D. BD and F. Al-Turjman, “A hybrid secure routing and monitoring mechanism in IoT-based wireless sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 97, p. 102022, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.102022.
- S. Maurya, V. K. Jain, and D. R. Chowdhury, “Delay aware energy efficient reliable routing for data transmission in heterogeneous mobile sink wireless sensor network,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 144, pp. 118–137, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.012.
- S. Jain, K. K. Pattanaik, and A. Shukla, “QWRP: Query-driven virtual wheel based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile sink,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 147, p. 102430, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102430.
- P. Srinivasa Ragavan and K. Ramasamy, “Software defined networking approach based efficient routing in multi-hop and relay surveillance using Lion Optimization algorithm,” Comput. Commun., vol. 150, pp. 764–770, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.11.033.
- Z. Sun, M. Wei, Z. Zhang, and G. Qu, “Secure Routing Protocol based on Multi-objective Ant-colony-optimization for wireless sensor networks,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., vol. 77, pp. 366–375, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.034.
- W. Qi, Q. Song, X. Kong, and L. Guo, “A traffic-differentiated routing algorithm in Flying Ad Hoc Sensor Networks with SDN cluster controllers,” J. Franklin Inst., vol. 356, no. 2, pp. 766–790, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.11.012.
- F. Al-Turjman, “Cognitive routing protocol for disaster-inspired Internet of Things,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 92, pp. 1103– 1115, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2017.03.014.
- R. W. L. Coutinho, A. Boukerche, and A. A. F. Loureiro, “A novel opportunistic power controlled routing protocol for internet of underwater things,” Comput. Commun., vol. 150, pp. 72–82, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.020.
- R. Yarinezhad and S. N. Hashemi, “Solving the load balanced clustering and routing problems in WSNs with an fpt-approximation algorithm and a grid structure,” Pervasive Mob. Comput., vol. 58, p. 101033, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2019.101033.
- M. Vigenesh and R. Santhosh, “An efficient stream region sink position analysis model for routing attack detection in mobile ad hoc networks,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 74, pp. 273–280, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.02.005.
- K. N. Qureshi, S. Din, G. Jeon, and F. Piccialli, “Link quality and energy utilization based preferable next hop selection routing for wireless body area networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 149, pp. 382– 392, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.030.
- S. Rashidibajgan and R. Doss, “Privacy-preserving history-based routing in Opportunistic Networks,” Comput. Secur., vol. 84, pp. 244– 255, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2019.03.020.
- E. P. M. Câmara Júnior, L. F. M. Vieira, and M. A. M. Vieira, “CAPTAIN: A data collection algorithm for underwater optical-acoustic sensor networks,” Comput. Networks, vol. 171, p. 107145, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107145.
- J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Multi-Adaptive Routing Protocol for Internet of Things based Ad-hoc Networks,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 887–909, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021- 08495-z.
- R. Jaganathan and R. Vadivel, “Intelligent Fish Swarm Inspired Protocol (IFSIP) for Dynamic Ideal Routing in Cognitive Radio Ad-Hoc Networks,” Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1063–1074, 2021, doi: 10.12785/ijcds/100196.
- J. Xu et al., “Data transmission method for sensor devices in internet of things based on multivariate analysis,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 157, p. 107536, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107536.
- G. Han, M. Xu, Y. He, J. Jiang, J. A. Ansere, and W. Zhang, “A dynamic ring-based routing scheme for source location privacy in wireless sensor networks,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 504, pp. 308–323, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.028.