AIRCC's International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Application of a Multilevel Technology Acceptance Management Model for Effective Technology Deployment


Affiliations
1 School of Computing and Information Technology, Department of Computing, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
 

Effective deployment of a technology in an environment is the desire of many system developers. Positive uptake of a technology coupled with user acceptance is deemed as a key indicator towards technology acceptance. Knowledge is weighed as a strategic resource for any successful data driven decision making initiative. Institutions leverage on technological initiatives and tools to drive knowledge management (KM) initiatives that enhance quality service delivery and prudent data management. These initiatives provide the overall strategy for managing data resources. They make available knowledge organization tools and techniques while enabling regular updates. Derived benefits of positive deployment of a technological intervention are competency enhancement through gained knowledge, raised quality of service and promotion of healthy development of e-commerce. Successful and timely adoption of technological interventions through which knowledge management initiatives are deployed remains a key challenge to many organizations. This paper proposes the application of a wholesome multilevel technology acceptance management model towards effective technology deployment. The proposed model takes into account human, technological and organizational variables, which exist in a deployment environment. This model will be vital in driving early technology acceptance prediction and timely deployment of mitigation measures to deploy technological interventions successfully.

Keywords

Model, Technology Acceptance, Knowledge, Management, Multilevel.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Uriarte F. A (2008). Introduction to Knowledge Management, Jakarta, Asean Foundation.

  • Kwanya T. Kiplang’at J. & Wamukoya J (2017). Emerging Trends in Information and Knowledge Management, Eldoret, Moi University Press.

  • Fernandez, I.B & Sabherwal, R (2010). Knowledge Management systems and Processes, New York, Armonk Publishers.

  • Talisayon S. (2013). Knowledge Management for the Public Sector, Tokyo, Asian Productivity Organization.

  • Odinioha, G.J and Chukwuma, O.L (2013). The International Journal of Management, Volume 2, Issue 3, Port Harcourt, Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.

  • Maier R. (2007). Knowledge Management Systems, Third Edition, Innsbruck, Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-71408-8.

  • Davis F., Bagozzi R. & Warshaw P. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Michigan, Ann Arbor, Institute of Management Science.

  • Dwivendi Y. K, Rana P.N. Jeyaraj A., Clement M. & Williams M. D. (2019). Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model. 21, 719–734. DOI 10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y.

  • Hwang, Y. Al-Arabiat M. & Shin, D.H (2016). Understanding Technology Acceptance in a Mandatory Environment, UK, Sage Publishers.

  • Scherer R., Siddiq F. & Tondeur J. (2018). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Meta-analytic Structural Equation Modelling Approach to Explaining Teachers’ Adoption of Digital Technology in Education: Norway, Elsevier.

  • Aizstrauta D., Ginters E. & Eroles M. P (2015). Applying Theory of Diffussion of Innovations to Evaluate Technology Acceptance and Sustainability. 43. 69-77. DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2014.12.010.

  • Lowe B., Dwivedi Y. & D’Alessandro S. (2019). Consumers and Technology in a Changing World. Retrieved 28 December, 2019 from https://kar.kent.ac.uk/73789/.

  • Gucin N. O.& Berk O. S. (2015). Technology Acceptance in Health Care: An Integrative Review of Predictive Factors and Intervention Programs. 195, 1698-1704. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.263.

  • Lai P. C (2017). The Literature Review of Technology Adoption Models and Theories for the Novelty Technology, Electronic Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21-38, Retrieved 20 April, 2019, from http://www.jistem.fea.usp.br

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

  • Greene K., (2009). Reasoned Action Theory Scope Components, New Jersey, Rutgers University Press.

  • Sutton, S., French, D.P., Hennings, S.J. et al. Curr Psychol (2003). 22: 234. DOI.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1019-1.

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Taherdoost H. (2018). A review of Technology Acceptance and Adoption Models and Theories. 22. 960-967. DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.08.137.

  • Davis, F. D. (1993). User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions And Behavioral Impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487. DOI:10.1006/imms.1993.1022.

  • Lim W. M (2018). Dialectic Antidotes to Critics of the Technology Acceptance Model: Conceptual, Methodological and Replication Treatments for Behavioral Modelling in Technology-Mediated Environments, Swinburne, Australasian Journal of Information Systems

  • Goodhue D. L & Thompson R. L (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota.

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of The Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. 46 ( 2) 186-204.

  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B. & Davis F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View, MIS Quarterly, Volume 27 (3),425-478.

  • Taylor S & Todd P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. The Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, DOI:10.1287/isre.6.2.144.

  • Zhou L. L., Marfo J. O., Antwi H. A., Antwi M. O., Kachie A.D. & Wireko S. A. (2019). Assessment of the social influence and dacilitating conditions that support nurses adoption of hospital electronic information management systems (HEIMS) in Ghana using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Retrieved 20 January, 2020. DOI.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0956-z.

  • Hamzat S. & Mabawonku I. (2018). Influence of Performance Expectancy and Facilitating Conditions on use of Digital Library by Engineering Lecturers in universities in South-west, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal).1620. from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1620

  • Alam M. Z., Hu W., & Gani M. O. (2019). An Empirical Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Adoption of Mobile Health Services in Bangladesh Based on Extended UTAUT Model. WHICEB 2019 Proceedings. 53 from https://aisel.aisel.org/whiceb2019/53

  • Fayad R. & Paper D. (2015). The Technology Acceptance Model E-Commerce Extension: A Conceptual Framework, Lebabon, Elsevier.

  • Mahmood M. A., Gemoets L. A., & Jacquez C. (1999). Variables Affecting Information Technology End-User Satisfaction. DOI:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0353.


Abstract Views: 481

PDF Views: 197




  • Application of a Multilevel Technology Acceptance Management Model for Effective Technology Deployment

Abstract Views: 481  |  PDF Views: 197

Authors

Gilbert Busolo
School of Computing and Information Technology, Department of Computing, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
Lawrence Nderu
School of Computing and Information Technology, Department of Computing, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
Kennedy Ogada
School of Computing and Information Technology, Department of Computing, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract


Effective deployment of a technology in an environment is the desire of many system developers. Positive uptake of a technology coupled with user acceptance is deemed as a key indicator towards technology acceptance. Knowledge is weighed as a strategic resource for any successful data driven decision making initiative. Institutions leverage on technological initiatives and tools to drive knowledge management (KM) initiatives that enhance quality service delivery and prudent data management. These initiatives provide the overall strategy for managing data resources. They make available knowledge organization tools and techniques while enabling regular updates. Derived benefits of positive deployment of a technological intervention are competency enhancement through gained knowledge, raised quality of service and promotion of healthy development of e-commerce. Successful and timely adoption of technological interventions through which knowledge management initiatives are deployed remains a key challenge to many organizations. This paper proposes the application of a wholesome multilevel technology acceptance management model towards effective technology deployment. The proposed model takes into account human, technological and organizational variables, which exist in a deployment environment. This model will be vital in driving early technology acceptance prediction and timely deployment of mitigation measures to deploy technological interventions successfully.

Keywords


Model, Technology Acceptance, Knowledge, Management, Multilevel.

References