Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Lai, Sen-Tarng
- Two-Layer Secure Prevention Mechanism for Reducing E-Commerce Security Risks
Abstract Views :210 |
PDF Views:120
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dept. of Information Technology and Management, Shih Chien University, Taipei, 104, TW
1 Dept. of Information Technology and Management, Shih Chien University, Taipei, 104, TW
Source
AIRCC's International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, Vol 7, No 6 (2015), Pagination: 71-82Abstract
E-commerce is an important information system in the network and digital age. However, the network intrusion, malicious users, virus attack and system security vulnerabilities have continued to threaten the operation of the e-commerce, making e-commerce security encounter serious test. How to improve ecommerce security has become a topic worthy of further exploration. Combining routine security test and security event detection procedures, this paper proposes the Two-Layer Secure Prevention Mechanism (TLSPM). Applying TLSPM, routine security test procedure can identify security vulnerability and defect, and develop repair operations. Security event detection procedure can timely detect security event, and assist follow repair. TLSPM can enhance the e-commerce security and effectively reduce the security risk of e-commerce critical data and asset.Keywords
E-Commerce, Security Testing, Event Detection, Security Event, TLSPM.- An Analyzer-Based Security Measurement Model for Increasing Software Security
Abstract Views :198 |
PDF Views:114
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Information Technology and Management, Shih Chien University, Taipei, TW
1 Department of Information Technology and Management, Shih Chien University, Taipei, TW
Source
AIRCC's International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, Vol 4, No 5 (2012), Pagination: 81-91Abstract
Software security has become an increasingly important issue for information and software system. Secure vulnerabilities of software system may cause a company out of business and even destroy the social normal operation. How to improve software security becomes a critical issue in software development process. In this paper, utilizing the static program analyzer and dynamic simulation analyzer to collect metrics, proposes an Analyzer-based Software Security Measurement (ASSM) model. Applying ASSM model, the secure flaws of software system can be identified clearly. And, using a Rule-based Software Security Improvement (RSSI) operation to control and improve security defects and security vulnerability of software system. The security risk of software system can be reduced efficiently.Keywords
Software Security, Security vulnerability, Security Metric, Measurement Model, ASSM.- A Process Quality Improvement Mechanism for Reducing the Risk of CI Environment
Abstract Views :210 |
PDF Views:97
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dept. of Information Technology and Management, Shih Chien University, Taipei, 104, TW
1 Dept. of Information Technology and Management, Shih Chien University, Taipei, 104, TW
Source
AIRCC's International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, Vol 9, No 3 (2017), Pagination: 117-130Abstract
In the age of fast evolution, software development project must accept many challenges of unpredicted requirements change and new technology environment. Software development processes should have adjustable and extendable features to meet the multifaceted needs of the users. Iterative and Incremental Development (IID) is a practical approach to overcome the various challenges of software development. However, continuous testing and building new versions need to spend more time and human resources that is a major obstacle of IID. The other, the iterative operations must have a sound communication skills. Lack of standard version control and intercommunication manner often lead to failure of software project. High quality Continuous Integration (CI) environment can effectively make up the defects of IID. In this paper, CI environment and advantages are deeply surveyed. In order to overcome the defects of IID, CI environment needs combine the perfect procedures and qualified tools, and concretely enhance the quality of CI environment. Based on the process quality measurement model, this paper proposes the Process Quality Improvement Mechanism (PQIM). Applying PQIM, in software development, the processes problems and the CI environment quality defects can identify timely and indeed revise to reduce the risk of CI environment.Keywords
Continuous Integration, IID, Development Risk, CI Environment, Quality Improvement.References
- Eveleens J. L. and Verhoef, C. (2010) “The Rise and Fall of the Chaos Report Figures, IEEE Software,” vol. 27, no. 1, pp30-36
- Boehm, B. W. (1991) “Software risk management: Principles and practices,” IEEE Software, vol. 8, no. 1, pp32-41.
- Schach S. R. (2011) Object-Oriented and Classical Software Engineering, Eighth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Larman C. and Basili, V. R. (2004) Iterative and Incremental Development: A Brief History, Computer, IEEE CS Press, pp47-56.
- Martin, R. C. (2002) Agile Software Development, Principles, Practices and Patterns, Prentice Hall,
- Martin Fowler, (2006) “Continuous Integration,” martinfowler.com, http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html
- Duvall, P.: Continuous Integration Servers and Tools, DZone Refcardz. (2015) https://dzone.com/refcardz/continuous-integration-servers#, (accessed Auguest 9, 2015)
- Duvall, P. and Matyas, S. and Glover, A. (2007) Continuous Integration: Improving Software Quality and Reducing Risk, Pearson Education, Inc.
- Saff, D. and Erns,M. D. (2003) Reducing Wasted Development Time via Continuous Testing, Proceeding of IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), pp281-292
- Hornstein, H. A. (2015) “The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, no. 2, pp291-298.
- STEWART J. (2015) Top 10 Reasons Why Projects Fail, http://project-management.com/top-10-reasons-why-projects-fail/.
- Symonds M. (2011) 15 CAUSES OF PROJECT FAILURE, https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/15-causes-of-project-failure.php.
- Szalvay, V. (2004) An Introduction to Agile Software Development,” CollabNet, Inc.
- Hoda, Rashina, et al. (2017) “Systematic literature reviews in agile software development: A tertiary study,” Information and Software Technology 85 pp60-70.
- Santos, M. A., et al. (2013) “Improving the Management of Cost and Scope in Software Projects Using Agile Practices,” International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT) 5(1).
- Booch, G. (1994) Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with applications 2nd edition, Addison Wesley Longman.
- Beck, K. (2003) Test-Driven Development: By Example, Addison-Wesley.
- Beck, K. (2004) Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd Edition (The XP Series) 2nd Edition
- Leon, A. (2015) Software Configuration Management Handbook, Third Edition, Artech House Inc.
- Fenton, N. E. (1991) Software Metrics - A Rigorous Approach, Chapman & Hall.
- Galin, D. (2004) Software Quality Assurance – From theory to implementation, Pearson Education Limited, England .
- Boehm, B.W. (1981) Software Engineering Economics, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.