International Journal of Engineering Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Review on Public Participatory Urbanism


Affiliations
1 MIT School of Architecture, Loni Kalbhor, Pune, India
 

This review examines the predominant theoretical approaches of public participatory urbanism adopted for the transformative & cohesive development of the neighborhoods. The conceptual differences between three major theories i.e. Tactical Urbanism, Do It Yourself Urbanism and Insurgent Public Spaces under Guerilla Urbanism will be examined. It will also seek the archetypal planning scenario observed in planning process.

The review will compare and contrast the ideological differences between the three approaches and it will conclude by finding important gaps & by recommending the probable solutions for the same.


Keywords

Tactical Urbanism, Do It Yourself Urbanism, Guerilla Urbanism.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • i. Boonstra B, B. L. (2011). Self-organization in urban development: Towards a new perspective. Urban Research & Practice , 4 (2), 99–122.

  • ii. Douglas, G. C. (2013). Do-It-Yourself Urban Design: The Social Practice of Informal “Improvement” Through Unauthorized Alteration. City & Community , Volume 13 (1), 5-25.

  • iii. Finn, D. (2014). DIY urbanism: implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability , 7 (4), 381-398.

  • iv. Hou, J. (2010). Insurgent Public Space : Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking. New York: Routledge Publishing.

  • v. Mike Lydon, A. G. (2015). Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action for Long-term Change. Washington DC: Island Press.

  • vi. Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy city: transforming our lives through urban design. Canada: Doubleday .

  • vii. Wohl, S. (2017). Tactical urbanism as a means of testing relational processes in space: A complex systems perspective. Planning Theory , Pg 1.


Abstract Views: 199

PDF Views: 0




  • A Review on Public Participatory Urbanism

Abstract Views: 199  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Harshad Raisoni
MIT School of Architecture, Loni Kalbhor, Pune, India
Mohammad Rajaullah
MIT School of Architecture, Loni Kalbhor, Pune, India

Abstract


This review examines the predominant theoretical approaches of public participatory urbanism adopted for the transformative & cohesive development of the neighborhoods. The conceptual differences between three major theories i.e. Tactical Urbanism, Do It Yourself Urbanism and Insurgent Public Spaces under Guerilla Urbanism will be examined. It will also seek the archetypal planning scenario observed in planning process.

The review will compare and contrast the ideological differences between the three approaches and it will conclude by finding important gaps & by recommending the probable solutions for the same.


Keywords


Tactical Urbanism, Do It Yourself Urbanism, Guerilla Urbanism.

References