International Journal of Information Studies & Libraries

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Investigation of Effectiveness of Mobile Learning Apps in Higher Education in India


Affiliations
1 Govt. Kaktiya PG College, Jagdalpur (Bastar), Chhattisgarh, India
2 Department of Library & Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Purpose: The purpose of the present paper is to investigate the effectiveness of mobile learning apps in the higher education in India. It also evaluates the role of mobile learning apps in students life.

Design/Methodology/Approach: A structured questionnaire was distributed online among students belonging to different Indian universities. The collected data was analyzed and presented in tabular form.

Findings: The present research revealed that role of mobile learning apps are increasing among students learning. The results indicated that the mobile learning apps can be very useful in the higher education environment. Furthermore, the results showed that the students had adequate knowledge and awareness to use mobile technology and the Internet in their educational environment.

Practical Implications: The present study is very useful for the policy makers to develop course curriculum which may include mobile learning apps as substitute for classes.

Originality/Value: The findings emphasize the popularity of mobile learning apps among students of higher education in India. It also reveals that mobile learning apps can be used effectively in the higher education.


Keywords

M-Learning, Mobile Technology, Mobile Devices, Higher Education, Mobile Learning Apps, Mobile Applications.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Alzaza, N. S., & Yaakub, A. R. (2011a). Mobile information prototype (SMIP) for the higher education environment. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 81-86.

  • Alzaza, N. S., & Yaakub, A. R. (2011b). Students awareness and requirements of mobile learning services in the higher education environment. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 95-100.

  • Barker, A., Krull, G., & Mallinson, B. (2005). A proposed theoretical model for m-learning adoption in developing countries. Mobile technology: The future of learning in your hands.

  • Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 211-218.

  • BenMoussa, C. (2003). Workers on the move: new opportunities through mobile commerce. Stockholm Mobility Roundtable. Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Chen, W., Tan, N., Looi, C., Zhang, B., & Seow, P. (2008). Handheld computers as cognitive tools: technology enhanced environmental learning. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 3(3), 231-252.

  • Churchill, D., & Churchill, N. (2008). Educational affordances of PDAs: A study of a teacher’s exploration of this technology. Computer and Education, 50(4), 1439-1450.

  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

  • Corbeil, J. R., & Valdes-Corbeil, M. E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? Educause Quarterly, 30(2), 51-58.

  • Crawford, V. M. (2007). Creating a powerful learning environment with networked mobile learning devices.

  • Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education 47(3), 47-50.

  • Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319-340.

  • Grant, M., & Gikas, J. (2011). Strategies for mobile teaching and learning. In: annual convention of the association for educational communications and technology, Jacksonville. FL.

  • Gu, X., Gu, F., & Laffey, J. M. (2011). Designing a mobile system for lifelong learning on the move. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 204-215.

  • Haag, J. (2011). From elearning to mlearning: The effectiveness of mobile course delivery. In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC). Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.

  • Hefling, K. (2012). Obama administration’s challenge to schools: Embrace digital textbooks within 5 years. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/challenge-to-schools-embr_n_1248196.html (Accessed 10 December 2015) Horton, W. (2006) E-learning by design. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

  • Hwang, G., & Chang, H. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.

  • Karim, N. S. A., Darus, S. H., & Hussin, R. (2006). Mobile phone applications in academic library services: A students’ feedback survey. Campus-Wide Information System, 23(1), 35-51.

  • Keller, J. (2011). The slow-motion mobile campus. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B4–B6.

  • Keskin, N. O., & Metcalf, D. (2011). The current perspectives, theories and practice of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 202-208.

  • Klopfer, E., Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. In: IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education pp. 95-98. Vaxjo, Sweden: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Lavoie, M. C. (2007). Enabling contextual mLearning: Design recommendations for a context-appropriate user interface enabling mobile learning. Concordia University (Canada), Vol. Master. Concordia University (Canada), Canada, p. 59.

  • Liu, Y, Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of M-learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211-1219.

  • Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). NESTA future lab report 11: Literature review in mobile technologies and learning. Retrieved from http://www2.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/lit_reviews/Mobile_Review.pdf (Accessed 12 August 2015)

  • Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(2), 78-102.

  • Peters, K. (2007). M-learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-17.

  • Rekkedal, T., & Dye, A. (2007). Mobile distance learning with PDAs: Development and testing of pedagogical and system solutions supporting mobile distance learners. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 51-74.

  • Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34(3-4), 177-193.

  • Shieh, D. (2009). These lectures are gone in 60 seconds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(26), A13.

  • Shih, E., & Mills, D. (2007). Setting the new standard with mobile computing in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 8(2), 1-6.

  • Traxler, J. (2007). Current state of mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 9-24.

  • Traxler, J. (2008). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1-12.

  • Traxler, J. (2010). Sustaining mobile learning and its institutions. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(4), 58-65.

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

  • Wang, S., & Higgins, M. (2006). Limitations of mobile phone learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 3-14.

  • Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118.

  • Young, J. R. (2011). Smartphones on campus: The search for ‘killer’ apps. The Chronicle of Higher Education B6-B8.

  • Yuen, S. C., & Yuen, P. K. (2008). Mobile learning. In L. A. Tomei (Ed.) Encyclopedia of information technology curriculum integration. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.


Abstract Views: 355

PDF Views: 2




  • An Investigation of Effectiveness of Mobile Learning Apps in Higher Education in India

Abstract Views: 355  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Mohd Shoaib Ansari
Govt. Kaktiya PG College, Jagdalpur (Bastar), Chhattisgarh, India
Aditya Tripathi
Department of Library & Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of the present paper is to investigate the effectiveness of mobile learning apps in the higher education in India. It also evaluates the role of mobile learning apps in students life.

Design/Methodology/Approach: A structured questionnaire was distributed online among students belonging to different Indian universities. The collected data was analyzed and presented in tabular form.

Findings: The present research revealed that role of mobile learning apps are increasing among students learning. The results indicated that the mobile learning apps can be very useful in the higher education environment. Furthermore, the results showed that the students had adequate knowledge and awareness to use mobile technology and the Internet in their educational environment.

Practical Implications: The present study is very useful for the policy makers to develop course curriculum which may include mobile learning apps as substitute for classes.

Originality/Value: The findings emphasize the popularity of mobile learning apps among students of higher education in India. It also reveals that mobile learning apps can be used effectively in the higher education.


Keywords


M-Learning, Mobile Technology, Mobile Devices, Higher Education, Mobile Learning Apps, Mobile Applications.

References