ICTACT Journal on Management Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Mediation Role of Resource Transformation Capabilities in Knowledge Management Potential and Quality Management Practices among SMEs


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, Makerere University Business School, Uganda
2 Department of Management Science, Makerere University Business School, Uganda
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mediation effect of resource transformation capabilities on the relationship between knowledge management potential and quality management practices among SMEs. The study adopts a cross-sectional survey to collect data from 210 units used to carry out the mediation investigation. Correlations, regressions and a Med-Graph were used in the analysis. Both knowledge management potential and resource transformation capabilities were found to have direct effects on quality management practices and resource transformation capabilities partially mediate the relationship between knowledge management potential and quality management practices among SMEs. The study scope was limited to the supply side of the firm, which focused on organisational value chain activities and ignored the end users of the product, the customers. However, operations managers in SME sub-sector should consider resource transformation capabilities as an entry point for knowledge management potential to achieve sustainable quality management practices. The study engenders indicative insights in the SME subsector, a gateway for employment generation, sustainable household incomes and much sought Gross Domestic Product generation through knowledge management potential, resource transformation capabilities and quality management practices.

Keywords

Uganda, SMEs, Quality Management Practices.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • A.B. Jaafreh and A.Z. Al-abedallat, “The Effect of Quality Management Practices on Organizational Performance in Jordan: An Empirical Study”, International Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 93-109, 2012.

  • T. Nguyet and Q. Nguyen, “Knowledge Management Capability and Competitive Advantage : An Empirical Study of Vietnamese Enterprises”, Available at: https://epubs.scu.edu.au/theses/211/.

  • D.J.Teece, “The Foundations of Enterprise Performance:Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an Economic Theory of Firms”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 328-352, 2014.

  • D.J.Teece, “Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: the Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance”, Strategic Management, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509-533, 2007.

  • P. Evangelista et al., “The Adoption of Knowledge Management Systems in Small Firms”, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 8, No., 1, pp. 33-42, 2010.

  • S. Kharuddin, “Information System and Firms’ Performance : The Case of Malaysian Small Medium Enterprises”, International Business Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 28-35, 2010.

  • Z.Z. Abdirahman et al., “The Implementation of a Quality Management Standard in a Food SME : A Network Learning Perspective”, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 214-227, 2013.

  • W. Rehman, N. Asghar and K. Ahmad, “Impact of Km Practices on Firms ’ Performance : A Mediating Role of Business Process Capability and Organizational Learning”, Pakistan Economic and Social Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 47-80, 2015.

  • Uganda MSME Policy, “Uganda Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME) Policy”, Available at: http://mtic.go.ug/2016/index.php?/doc_download/288-msme-policy/.

  • Oslo Manual, “Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation”, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, 2005.

  • J. Singh and H. Singh, “Kaizen Philosophy: A Review of Literature”, ICFAI Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 8, pp. 51-72, 2009.

  • W.I. Zangwill and P.B. Kantor, “Toward a Theory of Continuous Improvement and the Learning Curve”, Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 910-920, 1998.

  • T.D.B. Jeronimo and D.D. Medeiros, “The Mature of Strategic Business of Small and Medium-Sized High-Tech Companies in Brazil”, International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 143-153, 2012.

  • H.A. Halim et al., “The Growth of Innovative Performance among SMEs : Leveraging on Organisational Culture and Innovative Human Capital”, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Development, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 107-125, 2014.

  • Y.R. Kachba et al., “Alignment of Quality Management in SMEs with the Market Performance”, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 103-111, 2012.

  • A. Honarpour et al., “Knowledge Management , Total Quality Management and Innovation : A New Look”, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 22-31, 2012.

  • S. Daud, W. Fadzilah and W. Yusoff, “SMEs : The Role of Social Capital as a Mediating”, Proceedings of International Conference on E-Business and Applications, pp. 135-155, 2010.

  • O. Branzei and I. Vertinsky, “Strategic Pathways to Product Innovation Capabilities in SMEs”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 75-105, 2014.

  • D.M. Townsend and L.W. Busenitz, “Exploring the Role of Dynamic Capabilities in Early-Stage Capitalization Processes”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 292-306, 2015.

  • S.P. Macgregor, J. Arana, I. Parra, M. Pilar and S.P. Macgregor, “Supporting new product creation in Valley in the Mondrago”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 418-443, 2006.

  • C. Chen and J. Huang, “Strategic Human Resource Practices and Innovation Performance-The Mediating Role of Knowledge Management Capacity”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 104-114, 2009.

  • M. Personal et al., “Virtual Research and Development (R&D) Teams and New Product Development”, International Journal of Physical Science, Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 916-930, 2010.

  • H. Hung, “Influence of the Environment on Innovation Performance of TQM”, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 715-730, 2007.

  • M. Dassisti et al., “HY-CHANGE : A Hybrid Methodology for Continuous Performance Improvement of Manufacturing Processes”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 48, No. 15, pp. 4397-4422, 2010.

  • O. Jones, “From Maturity to Entrepreneurship : A Stakeholder Model of Innovation”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 107-114, 1998.

  • L.F. Lages, “Relationship Capabilities, Quality, and Innovation as Determinants of Export Performance”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 47-70, 2009.

  • L. Raymond, “Enabling the Business Strategy of SMEs Through E-Business Capabilities A Strategic Alignment Perspective”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 108, No. 5, pp. 577-595, 2008.

  • H. Zhou, “Knowledge Management as a Strategic Tool to Foster Innovativeness of SMEs Report Series”, ERIM Report Series, pp. 1-6, 2009.

  • M. Saunila, “The Relationship between Innovation Capability and Performance: The Moderating effect of Measurement”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 63, pp. 234-249, 2014.

  • T. Do et al., “Determinants of the Innovation Rent”, International Small Business, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1-30, 2011.

  • M. Saunila, “Performance Management through Innovation Capability in SMEs”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 162-175, 2016.

  • O.U. Asikhia et al., “SMEs Wealth Creation Model : A Conceptual Framework”, African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-19, 2015.

  • Robert.Saxe and B.A. Weitz, “The SOCO Scale : A Measure of the Customer Orientation of Salespeople”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 343-351,2010.

  • E. Sadikoglu and H. Olcay, “The Effects of Total Quality Management ( TQM) Practices on Performance and the Reasons of and the Barriers to TQM Practices”, Vol. 1, No. 35, pp. 65-69, 2014.

  • C. Bratianu and I. Orzea, “Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Management, Marketing Challenges for Knowledge Society, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 41-62, 2010.

  • R. Huisman and C. Huurman, “Fat Tails in Power Prices”, Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureri/924.html.

  • H. Chang and F. Pai, “The Effects of Knowledge Sharing and Absorption on Organizational Innovation Performance-A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, Vol. 8, pp. 83-97, 2013.

  • A. Griffin, “PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 429-458, 1997.

  • V.K. Kumar and E.R. Holman, “Creativity-Styles-Questionnaire-Revised”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 51-58, 1997.

  • A.G. Farinda, “Building Business Networking : A Proposed Framework for Malaysian SMEs”, International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 5, pp. 151-160, 2009.

  • O.J. Borch, “Dynamic Capabilities Facilitating Innovative Strategies in SMEs”, International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 109-117, 2007.

  • Catherine L. Wang and P. Ahmed, “Dynamic Capabilities : A Review and Research Agenda Dynamic Capabilities ”, The International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 9, pp. 31-51, 2007.

  • C.L. Wang, “The Development and Validation of the Organisational Innovativeness Construct Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 303-313, 2004.

  • S.E. Krauss, and U. Putra, “Research Paradigms and Meaning Making : A Primer”, The Qualitative Report, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 758-770, 2005.

  • W.L. Neuman, “Basics of Social Research; Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches”, 2nd Edition, Pearson Education, 2007.

  • S. Almalki, “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research-Challenges and Benefits”, Journal of Education and Learning, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 288-296, 2016.

  • J.W. Creswell, “Research Design”, SAGE Publications, 2003.

  • R.V. Krejcie and D.W. Morgan, “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 607-610, 1970.

  • J. Ayala-Cruz, “Performance Assessment of an Operations Strategy under Uncertainty Integrating BSC Logic and Monte Carlo Simulation”, International Journal of Management and Organizational Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 1-8, 2015.

  • P.M. Podsakoff, “Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 63, pp. 539-569, 2012.

  • D.D. Nulty, “The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys : What Can Be Done ?”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 301-314, 2008.

  • M. Vardeman, “Why Data Cleaning is Important: Debunking the Myth of Robustness”, SAGE Publication, 2003.

  • J. Bardsley, “A Computational Method for the Restoration of Images with an Unknown, Spatially-Varying Blur”, Optics Express, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 1767-1782,2006.

  • A. Field, “Discovering Statistics Using SPS”, 3rd Edition, SAGE Publication, 2009.

  • J.V. Petrocelli, “Hierarchical Multiple Regression in Counseling Research: Common Problems and Possible Remedies”, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 9-22, 2003.

  • P.A. Frazier et al., “Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 115-134, 2004.

  • R.M. Baron et al., “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research : Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 1173-1182, 1986.

  • P.E. Jose, “Doing Statistical Mediation and Moderation”, 3rd Edition, The Guilford Press, 2013.

  • H. Soltan and B. Vaisi, “Study of the Relationship between Knowldge Manageenent and project Quality managenegt Considering the Key Knowledge Factors in Construction Industry”, Jornal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 21, pp. 2745-2749, 2014.

  • F.O. Omotayo, “Knowledge Management as an Important Tool in Organisational Management : A Review of Literature”, Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3330&context=libphilprac.


Abstract Views: 142

PDF Views: 0




  • Mediation Role of Resource Transformation Capabilities in Knowledge Management Potential and Quality Management Practices among SMEs

Abstract Views: 142  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

B. Onyinyi
Department of Economics, Makerere University Business School, Uganda
W. Kaberuka
Department of Management Science, Makerere University Business School, Uganda

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mediation effect of resource transformation capabilities on the relationship between knowledge management potential and quality management practices among SMEs. The study adopts a cross-sectional survey to collect data from 210 units used to carry out the mediation investigation. Correlations, regressions and a Med-Graph were used in the analysis. Both knowledge management potential and resource transformation capabilities were found to have direct effects on quality management practices and resource transformation capabilities partially mediate the relationship between knowledge management potential and quality management practices among SMEs. The study scope was limited to the supply side of the firm, which focused on organisational value chain activities and ignored the end users of the product, the customers. However, operations managers in SME sub-sector should consider resource transformation capabilities as an entry point for knowledge management potential to achieve sustainable quality management practices. The study engenders indicative insights in the SME subsector, a gateway for employment generation, sustainable household incomes and much sought Gross Domestic Product generation through knowledge management potential, resource transformation capabilities and quality management practices.

Keywords


Uganda, SMEs, Quality Management Practices.

References