Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis of Low Power Conditional Flip Flop in 32NM CMOS Technology for Power Constraint and Speed Sensitive Applications


Affiliations
1 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Noida International University, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In this paper, various conditional flip flops topologies are simulated in 32nm CMOS technology using BSMv4 model and compared on the basis of Power consumption, delay (Clk to Q) and Power delay Product. In Various designs of conditional flip flops, our main objective is to optimize the best design on the basis of delay and power. Simulation results showed that by using Pulse Enhancement Scheme (PES) in flip flop, power dissipation is reduced to 59.43% when compared with conditional feed through flip flop technique and further reduction of 43.34% was observed in delay at room temperature. On increasing the temperature PES technique still have less power consumption of 35.95% when compare to conditional feed through flip flop technique. It was also observed that PES technique can be used at lower voltage levels. So that dissipation and delay both reduced. In terms of delay among all designs, Single ended conditional capturing energy recovery (SCCER) has minimum delay of 2.4865ns at room temperature and 2.4843ns at 1.5V power supply. Power delay product (PDP) at room temperature of SCCER is 0.7177aJ. These results of flip flop using conditional techniques at different temperature consideration and at different voltage give us an idea to choose which scheme is better in terms of delay, power consumption and PDP.

Keywords

Pulse Enhancement Scheme, SCCER, PDP, Power Dissipation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • G. Keiser, “Optical Fiber Communication”, 3rd Edition, Mcgraw-Hill, 2000.
  • G.P. Agrawal, “Fiber Optic Communication Systems”, John Willey and Sons, 1997.
  • P.C. Pecker, N.A. Olsson and J.R. Simpson, “Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier Fundamentals and Technology”, Academic Press 1999.
  • Suneet Kumar, “Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration of Optical Amplifiers (EDFa, RAMAN and EDFA-RAMAN) for Intensity Modulated WDM Systems”, Advances in Optical Technologies, Vol. 2017, pp. 1-13, 2017.
  • Ahmed Nabih Zaki Rashed and Abd El-Naser A. Mohamed, “Different Pumping Categories of Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers Performance Signature with Both Wide Multiplexing and Modulation Techniques”, International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 1-14, 2016.
  • Optical Fiber Amplifiers, Available at: https://www.hft.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg154/ONT/Skript/ENG-Ver/EDFA.pdf, Accessed at 2016.
  • Farah Diana Binti Mahad and Abu Sahmah Bin Mohammad Supa, “EDFA Gain Optimization of WDM Systems”, Master Thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti teknologi Malasia, pp. 1-56, 2009.
  • Giridhar Kumar and Iman Sadhu, “Gain and Noise Figure Analysis of EDFA by Four Stage Enhancement and Analysis”, International Journal of Scientific and Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 1-14, 2014.
  • Ronak R. Vashi and Arpan H. Choksi, “Modeling of Gain Flattening using EDFA-EYCDFA in Cascading Mode”, International Journal of Emerging Trends and Technology in Computer Science, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 1-12, 2013.

Abstract Views: 286

PDF Views: 0




  • Analysis of Low Power Conditional Flip Flop in 32NM CMOS Technology for Power Constraint and Speed Sensitive Applications

Abstract Views: 286  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rakesh
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Noida International University, India
Owais Ahmad Shah
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Noida International University, India

Abstract


In this paper, various conditional flip flops topologies are simulated in 32nm CMOS technology using BSMv4 model and compared on the basis of Power consumption, delay (Clk to Q) and Power delay Product. In Various designs of conditional flip flops, our main objective is to optimize the best design on the basis of delay and power. Simulation results showed that by using Pulse Enhancement Scheme (PES) in flip flop, power dissipation is reduced to 59.43% when compared with conditional feed through flip flop technique and further reduction of 43.34% was observed in delay at room temperature. On increasing the temperature PES technique still have less power consumption of 35.95% when compare to conditional feed through flip flop technique. It was also observed that PES technique can be used at lower voltage levels. So that dissipation and delay both reduced. In terms of delay among all designs, Single ended conditional capturing energy recovery (SCCER) has minimum delay of 2.4865ns at room temperature and 2.4843ns at 1.5V power supply. Power delay product (PDP) at room temperature of SCCER is 0.7177aJ. These results of flip flop using conditional techniques at different temperature consideration and at different voltage give us an idea to choose which scheme is better in terms of delay, power consumption and PDP.

Keywords


Pulse Enhancement Scheme, SCCER, PDP, Power Dissipation.

References