Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Lifecycle Cost of Water Points in Bangladesh:Issues of Community Cost Sharing and Sustainability


Affiliations
1 Plan International, Bangladesh
2 WaterAid, Bangladesh
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Government agencies and NGOs in many cases establish large number of water points to increase their coverage, without considering much about sustainability. Hence, sustainability of water points under the existing modality of community cost sharing always remain a problem. Many facilities become nonfunctional due to lack of fund generated at the community level to maintain these facilities after phase out. Without having any scientific evidence on the extent of maintenance cost in a project life cycle agencies taking care of rural water supply used to ignore this funding issue, considering operations and maintenance as a minor expenditure to be taken care of voluntarily by the society itself, and hence, don't have any budget allocated to carry on such maintenance activities. This paper, however, highlighted that maintenance cost contribute a lion share to the total life cycle cost of water points, and so should be taken care of seriously. Analyzing life cycle cost data from a randomly selected sample of 220 water points, 1259 household beneficiaries, and other key government officials and private entrepreneurs in eight different locations of Bangladesh this study demonstrated that operation and capital maintenance expenditure occupy a lion share of the total life cycle cost of water points that would be as high as 90 per cent in few instances. Similar study can also be conducted in other developing countries to prioritize the issue of operations and maintenance cost and, thereby, develop specific business models for community cost sharing, to improve the sustainability of water points.


Keywords

Life Cycle Cost, Operations and Maintenance Cost, Community Cost Sharing, Sustainability.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Baumann, E., & Danert, K. (2008). Operation and maintenance of rural water supplies in Malawi. SKAT (Swiss Resource Cente and Consultancies for Development). Retrieved from http://www.rural-watersupply.net/_ressources/documents/default/208.pdf.
  • Fonseca, C., Franceys, R., Batchelor, C., McIntyre, P., Klutse, A., Komives, K.,…Snehalatha M. (2011). Life-cycle costs approach: Costing sustainable services, WashCost, Briefing note, 1a, Netherlands: International Water and Sanitation Centre (IRC). Retrieved from http://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/ files/briefing_note_1a_-_life-cycle_cost_approach.pdf.
  • Gibson, J. (2010). Operation and maintenance costs of rural water supply schemes in South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/ Gibson-2010-Operation.pdf
  • Jones, S. A., Anya, A. Stacey, N. & Weir, L. (2012). A life-cycle approach to improve the sustainability of rural water systems in resource-limited countries. Retrieved from http://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/3/2/233.
  • Office of the President, Republic of South Africa. (1997). Water Services Act 1997 (Act no. 108 of 1997).
  • Retrieved from https://www.dwa.gov.za/IO/Docs/ a108-97.pdf.
  • RWSN. (2010). Myths of the rural water supply sector. RWSN perspective paper, 4. Retrieved from http:// www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/RWSN-2010Myths.pdf
  • WaterAid. (2010). Sustainability of rural water supply in Timor Leste: How big is the challenge and how we are going to challenge it? WaterAid discussion paper. Retrieved from http://www.wateraid.org/policy-practice-and-advocacy/sustainability/ resources.

Abstract Views: 234

PDF Views: 1




  • Lifecycle Cost of Water Points in Bangladesh:Issues of Community Cost Sharing and Sustainability

Abstract Views: 234  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Mohammod Lutful Kabir
Plan International, Bangladesh
Khairul Islam
WaterAid, Bangladesh

Abstract


Government agencies and NGOs in many cases establish large number of water points to increase their coverage, without considering much about sustainability. Hence, sustainability of water points under the existing modality of community cost sharing always remain a problem. Many facilities become nonfunctional due to lack of fund generated at the community level to maintain these facilities after phase out. Without having any scientific evidence on the extent of maintenance cost in a project life cycle agencies taking care of rural water supply used to ignore this funding issue, considering operations and maintenance as a minor expenditure to be taken care of voluntarily by the society itself, and hence, don't have any budget allocated to carry on such maintenance activities. This paper, however, highlighted that maintenance cost contribute a lion share to the total life cycle cost of water points, and so should be taken care of seriously. Analyzing life cycle cost data from a randomly selected sample of 220 water points, 1259 household beneficiaries, and other key government officials and private entrepreneurs in eight different locations of Bangladesh this study demonstrated that operation and capital maintenance expenditure occupy a lion share of the total life cycle cost of water points that would be as high as 90 per cent in few instances. Similar study can also be conducted in other developing countries to prioritize the issue of operations and maintenance cost and, thereby, develop specific business models for community cost sharing, to improve the sustainability of water points.


Keywords


Life Cycle Cost, Operations and Maintenance Cost, Community Cost Sharing, Sustainability.

References