Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
People as Partners in Panchayti Raj and Development:An Analysis of Attitude and Awareness
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Despite participatory development process envisaged in the Directive Principle of State Policy and 73rd amendment and enactment of Bihar Panchayati Raj Act 2006 giving sweeping power to panchayat, people's participation in the governance process and development has not yet been institutionalized. The development projects are non-participatory baring few elites and powerful. The reason for this is mainly people are not aware about the provision of Panchayati Raj and people's participation. Even though some people are aware, but they fear backlash from the elected representatives and elites. Gramsabha and panchayat meetings are mere formalities and most of the times their proceedings are recorded without their actual occurrence. The government seems apathetic to transfer the real power: fund, functions, and functionaries. This causes wastage of resources. Most of the people have very favourable attitude on participation and volunteering in development process. So there is a need for integrated and concerted action to strengthen the people's participation on the part of the state.
Keywords
- Bhuyan, B. (2010). Institutionalizing participatory democracy at the local level: Issues and challenges. Orissa Review.
- Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the Periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21-39.
- Brouah, M. (2013). Role of Panchayti Raj Institution in Assam and People’s Participation after 73rd constitution amendment Act 1992. Internal Journal for Basic and Social Sciences, 2(2), 145-149. ISSN: 2319-2968 Published by Research Foundation for Basic Social Sciences, India.
- Conway, M. M. (2000). Political participation in the United States (3rd ed.). Washington, CQ Press.
- Census of India (2011). Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
- Census of India (2001). Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
- Gloppen, S., Ranker, L., & Tostensen, A. (2003). Responsiveness to the concerns of the poor and accountability to the commitment to poverty reduction. Working Paper 2003: 9, Norway, Chr. Michelsen Institute.
- Hussain, S. (2015). Evaluate the participation level of elected women representatives (EWRs) in panchayati raj institutions and challenges faced by them: A study of kadwa block in katihar of Bihar. Social Work Chronicle, 4(1).
- Mohammad, S. N. (2010). People’s participation in development projects at grassischolar_mains level: A case study of Alampur and Jagannathpur Union Parishad. North South University, Bangladesh.
- Nirguni, R., & Bandhu, R. R. (2013). Panchayati Raj facing bureaucratic eclipse in Bihar. Panchayti Raj Updates. Institute of Social Science, Delhi, 20(4).
- Patnaik, P. (2005). Affirmative action and political participation: Elected representatives in the panchayats of Orissa, Working Paper No. 16, Bangalore, ISEC.
- Rashid, M., & Sen, A. (2010). Participatory Panchayati raj institutions and awareness of rural development programs in Bihar, institute of town planner. India
Abstract Views: 205
PDF Views: 0