Indian Journal of Sustainable Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Energy Conservation Behaviour of Individuals:A New Age Imperative for Sustainable Development


Affiliations
1 Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Raisan, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
2 School of Petroleum Management, Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Raisan, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Role of human behaviour in mitigating climate change, controlling Green House Gas (GHG) emissions, reducing carbon footprint leading to sustainable development, is at the centre of all policy discussions across the globe, thereby tailoring human behaviour is considered imperative by contemporary scholarship. This study attempts to understand the psycho-social interaction of individuals that promote such a human action. Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) framework has been used to predict human behaviour assuming human behaviour for energy conservation is one of the pro-social low-cost behaviour. Value orientation of individuals, energy conservation beliefs, subjective norms, perceived behaviour control, and energy conservation attitude have been measured to gauge the behavioural intention, along with capturing the socio-economic realities pertaining to households and individuals therein. Awareness towards energy conservation efforts and social interaction are found to be key behaviour influencers, whereas energy conservation intent is found to be gender neutral. Study implies the underlying necessity to explore mediating and moderating models in order to decipher complex inter-play among key variables for predicting energy conservation behaviour intent.

Keywords

Energy Conservation Behaviour, Theory of Planned Behaviour, Sustainable Development.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings ? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711-720. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2011). Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecology Review, 18(1), 30-40.

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273-291. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Berkhout, P. H. G., Muskens, J., & Veldhuijsen, J. W. (2000). Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 28(6-7), 425-432.

  • Barnes, H., & Parks, C. (2012). Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 246-259. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.002

  • Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. (2005). The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual and purchase-related conservation behaviours, 33, 1425-1444. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.016

  • Brandon, G., & Lewis, A. (1999). Reducing household energy consumption: A qualitative and quantitative field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 75-85.

  • Yu, B., Zhang, J., & Fujiwara, A. (2011). Representing in-home and out-of-home energy consumption behavior in Beijing. Energy Policy, 39(2011), 4168-4177.

  • Croucher, M. (2011). Potential problems and limitations of energy conservation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 39(10), 5795-5799. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.011

  • Datar, C. (2011). Illustrations of sustainable natural resource use practices. In Ecofeminism revisited: Introduction to the discourse. New Delhi: Rawat Publications; [chapter 12].

  • DeGischolar_main, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environental significant behaviour: How to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric values. Enviroment and Behaviour, 40(3), 330-354.

  • Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 106(44), 18452-18456.

  • Dwyer, P. C., Maki, A., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Promoting energy conservation behavior in public settings: The influence of social norms and personal responsibility. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 30-34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.002

  • Gardner, G. T., & Stren, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior (2nd Ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.

  • Langewin, J., Gurian, P. L., & Wen, J. (2013). Reducing energy consumption in low income public housing. Applied Energy, 102, 1358-1370.

  • Lingyun, M., Rui, N., Hualong, L., & Xiaohua, L. (2011). Empirical research of social norms affecting urban residents low carbon energy consumption behavior. Energy Procedia, 5, 229-234. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.041

  • Lutzenhiser, L. (1992). A cultural model of household energy consumption. Energy, 17(1), 47-60.

  • Lutzenhiser, L. (1993). Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 247-289.

  • Martinsson, J., Lundqvist, L. J., & Sundstr, A. (2011). Energy saving in Swedish households. The ( relative ) importance of environmental attitudes. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5182-5191. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.046

  • Mccalley, L. T., & Midden, C. J. H. (2002). Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 589-603.

  • Macey, S. (1991). A causal model of the adoption of home heating energy conservation measures. Energy, 16, 621-630.

  • Miller, C. A., Richter, J., & Leary, J. O. (2015). Energy research & social science socio-energy systems design : A policy framework for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 29-40. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.004

  • Moll, H. C., Noorman, K. J., Kok, R., Engstrom, R., Throne-Holst, H., & Clark, C. (2005). Pursuing more sustainable consumption by analyzing house-hold metabolism in European countries and cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1-2), 259-578.

  • Oceja, L., & Berenguer, J. (2009). Putting text in context: The conflict between pro-ecological messages and anti-ecological descriptive norms. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 657-666.

  • O’lander, F., & Thogerson, J. (1995). Understanding of consumer behavior as a prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18, 317-357.

  • Pachauri, S. (2004). An analysis of cross-sectional variations in total household energy requirements in India using micro survey data. Energy Policy, 32(15), 1723-1735.

  • Pachauri, R. (2008, September 19). Blog: Lifestyle changes for a healthy planet. Retrieved from http://blog.rkpachauri.org/blog/4/Lifestyle-Changesfor-A-Healthy-Planet.htm

  • Pachauri S., & Rao, N. D. (2013). Gender impacts and determinants of energy poverty: Are we asking the right questions? Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability, 5(2), 205-215 DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.006

  • Pandey, V. L., & Chaubal, A. (2011). Comprehending household cooking energy choice in rural India. Biomass Bioenerg, 35(11), 4724-4731.

  • Parikh, J. K. (1995). Gender issues in energy policy. Energy Policy, 23(9), 745-54.

  • Raosoft Sample Size Calculator. Retrieved from http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html

  • Ryan, S. E. (2014). Energy research & social science rethinking gender and identity in energy studies. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 96-105. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.008

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1973). Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 349-364.

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influence on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 10, pp. 221-279), New York: Academic Press.

  • Steg, L. (2008). Promoting household energy conservation, 36, 4449-4453. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027

  • Vandenbergh, M. P., Barkenbus, J., & Gilligan, J. (2008). Individual carbon emissions: The low hanging fruit. UCLA Law Review, 55, 1701-1758.

  • Wenshun, W., Xiaohua, L., & Hualong, L. (2011). Empirical research of the environmental responsibility affected on the urban residential housing energy saving investment behavior. Energy Procedia, 5, 991-997. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.175

  • Werff, E. V. D., & Steg, L. (2015). Energy research & social science one model to predict them all: Predicting energy behaviours with the norm activation model. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 8-14. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.002

  • Warner, C. M., Cook, S., Colby, J., & Lim, H. J. (2012). Lights out in university classrooms: Brief group discussion can change behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 418-426. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.001

  • Wei, Y. M., Liu, L. C., Fan, Y., & Wu, G., (2007). The impact of lifestyle on energy use and CO2 emission: An empirical analysis of China’s residents. Energy Policy, 35, 247-257.


Abstract Views: 375

PDF Views: 0




  • Energy Conservation Behaviour of Individuals:A New Age Imperative for Sustainable Development

Abstract Views: 375  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rutwik J. Gandhe
Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Raisan, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
Satish C. Pandey
School of Petroleum Management, Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Raisan, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Abstract


Role of human behaviour in mitigating climate change, controlling Green House Gas (GHG) emissions, reducing carbon footprint leading to sustainable development, is at the centre of all policy discussions across the globe, thereby tailoring human behaviour is considered imperative by contemporary scholarship. This study attempts to understand the psycho-social interaction of individuals that promote such a human action. Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) framework has been used to predict human behaviour assuming human behaviour for energy conservation is one of the pro-social low-cost behaviour. Value orientation of individuals, energy conservation beliefs, subjective norms, perceived behaviour control, and energy conservation attitude have been measured to gauge the behavioural intention, along with capturing the socio-economic realities pertaining to households and individuals therein. Awareness towards energy conservation efforts and social interaction are found to be key behaviour influencers, whereas energy conservation intent is found to be gender neutral. Study implies the underlying necessity to explore mediating and moderating models in order to decipher complex inter-play among key variables for predicting energy conservation behaviour intent.

Keywords


Energy Conservation Behaviour, Theory of Planned Behaviour, Sustainable Development.

References