Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Structural Analysis and Prototyping of Truck Under-Run Protection Device


Affiliations
1 Dept of Mechanical, Ashoka Institute of Engineering and Technology, Toopranpet, TS, India
2 Dept of Mechanical Engineering, Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, Deshmukhi, TS, India
 

In the present research work we are focusing on side under-run protection devices protect road users such as pedestrians and cyclists from slipping sideways under the wheels of trucks and trailers, and can also improve the aerodynamic performance of heavy vehicles. The basic objective is to improve the safety of the car and the occupants by designing the Rear Under-run Protection Device (RUPD) and car bumper. The choice of material and the structural design are major factors for impact energy absorption during a crash. This study concentrates on component functions, geometry, behavior of material and other parameters that influence the compatibility of the car bumper and rear under run protection device. The analysis was carried out using Finite Elements software SOLIDWORKS. This analysis is a partial work of a major project wherein the RUPD will be subjected to static testing with variable load distributions at different locations on RUPD. After the analysis, the pattern of the part is obtained using Rapid prototyping machine. This can be used for Machining/ casting of the original part. Rapid Prototyping (RPT) can be defined as a group of techniques used to quickly fabricate a scale model of a part or assembly using three-dimensional computer aided design (CAD) data.

Keywords

Solidworks, RUPD, Under-Run, Finite Element Analysis, Rapid Prototyping, Von Mises Stress.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • i. Jim Anderson CIC, Cranfield Impact Centre, UK, Johann Gwehenberger GDV, Institute for Vehicle Safety, Munich, DE, JenöBende GDV, Institute for Vehicle Safety, Munich, DE FlorisLeneman TNO Automotive, NL “Truck/Trailer Compatibility with Cars and Related Topics from VC-COMPAT” http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jmce/papers/vol8 issue2/C0821925.pdf?id=6649
  • ii. MatejGlavac, Univ.Dipl.-Ing., Prof. Dr. ZoranRen University of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering “Computational Approval for Rear Under Run Protection Device with MSC. Nastran” 2001-12 http://www.ijera.com/pages/v3no4.html
  • iii. “Safety inspection of rear under-run protection device in Slovenia (No. 58.01)”, Uradni list RepublikeSlovenije, No. 3, 20.1.1995, p. 182- 183 http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosrjmce/ papers/vol8-issue2/C0821925.pdf?id=6649
  • iv. Liu Hong-Fei and Peng Tao Xu Hong-Guo, Tan Li-dong and Su Li-li College of Transportation University of Jilin, Changchun, Jilin province, China “Research on the Intelligent Rear Under-run Protection System for Trucks” Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation July 6-9 2010, Jinan, China https://issuu.com/iosrjournals/docs/c0821925
  • v. Kaustubh Joshi, T.A. Jadhav, Ashok Joshi “Finite Element Analysis of Rear Under-Run Protection Device (RUPD) for Impact Loading” International Journal of Engineering Research and Development ISSN: 2278- 067X, Volume 1, Issue 7 (June 2012), PP.19- 26 www.ijerd.com. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4b5e/cbc517242b32da1b35252f7b2d bc9a296b2f.pdf
  • vi. Zou R., Rechnitzer G., Grzebieta R. “Simulation of Truck Rear Under-run Barrier Impact", 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Amsterdam, June 4-7, 2001. http://www.dvexperts.net/pubs/simulation_of_truck_rear_underrun_ barrier_impact.pdf
  • vii. MuxiLEI,Zhengbao LEI, ShubinWEI,YonghanLI “Geometry optimization design for crank-slider-CST type low rear protection device of truck”978-1-61284-459- 6/11/©2011 IEEE. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5768608/
  • viii. Mr. George Joseph, Mr. Dhananjay Shinde, Mr. Gajendra Patil “Design and Optimization of the Rear Under-.Run Protection Device Using LS-DYNA” International Journal Of Engineering Research And Applications (IJERA), ISSN: 2248-9622 Www.Ijera.Com Vol. 3, Issue 4,Jul-Aug,2013,pp.152-162, http://www.ijera.com/papers/Vol3_issue4/Z34152162.pdf
  • ix. Sumit Sharma Dy Manager VECV Pithampur Indore, Shailesh Pawar Dy Manager VECV Pithampur Indore, Dharmendra Patel Associate Engineer VECV Pithampur Indore, Sandeep Sharma Manager VECV Pithampur Indore, “Finite Element Analysis of Rear Under-run Protection Device (RUPD) With Sequential Loadings and Strain Mapping Method in Radioss” http://www.altairatc.com/india/bangalore/technicalpresentations/ RNL-06 Finite_Element_Analysis_of_Rear_Underrun_Protection_VECV.pdf
  • x. Dr. T. Ramamohan Rao , A. Rama Krishna “Design and Optimization of Front Under-run Protection Device” IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN: 22781684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 8, Issue 2 (Jul. - Aug. 2013), PP 1925 www.iosrjournals.org, http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosrjmce/ papers/vol8-issue2/C0821925.pdf?id=6649

Abstract Views: 205

PDF Views: 0




  • Structural Analysis and Prototyping of Truck Under-Run Protection Device

Abstract Views: 205  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Eppa Rakesh
Dept of Mechanical, Ashoka Institute of Engineering and Technology, Toopranpet, TS, India
Dharmendra Singh
Dept of Mechanical, Ashoka Institute of Engineering and Technology, Toopranpet, TS, India
G. Lakshmi Srinivas
Dept of Mechanical Engineering, Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, Deshmukhi, TS, India

Abstract


In the present research work we are focusing on side under-run protection devices protect road users such as pedestrians and cyclists from slipping sideways under the wheels of trucks and trailers, and can also improve the aerodynamic performance of heavy vehicles. The basic objective is to improve the safety of the car and the occupants by designing the Rear Under-run Protection Device (RUPD) and car bumper. The choice of material and the structural design are major factors for impact energy absorption during a crash. This study concentrates on component functions, geometry, behavior of material and other parameters that influence the compatibility of the car bumper and rear under run protection device. The analysis was carried out using Finite Elements software SOLIDWORKS. This analysis is a partial work of a major project wherein the RUPD will be subjected to static testing with variable load distributions at different locations on RUPD. After the analysis, the pattern of the part is obtained using Rapid prototyping machine. This can be used for Machining/ casting of the original part. Rapid Prototyping (RPT) can be defined as a group of techniques used to quickly fabricate a scale model of a part or assembly using three-dimensional computer aided design (CAD) data.

Keywords


Solidworks, RUPD, Under-Run, Finite Element Analysis, Rapid Prototyping, Von Mises Stress.

References