Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Understanding Local Conflicts in International Relations: A Critical Security Studies Perspective


Affiliations
1 School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
 

The role of local conflicts is important to understand sectional and communal differences in post-colonial societies. In spite of the rhetoric of democracy and secularism, state governance has not been successful in restraining instances of communal conflicts and also the incessant rise of jingoism and parochial tendencies within mainstream politics. The absence of a linear progression in the improvement of social relations between people, especially between religious communities is indeed puzzling. This problem has also engulfed the Indian state. These events not only contradict the image of India as a secular democratic state, but also question the legitimacy of conferring such designations as „responsible‟ and „rising‟ upon the Indian state. These internal conflicts throw light upon inherent deficiencies of the Indian state and raises apprehensions about its international perceptions. Rather than explaining this scenario, it is important to understand the background of such confrontation between communities. From the perspective of Critical Security Studies, it is possible to contextualise conflicts within post-colonial societies and understand their relevance in global society. In this paper, an attempt has been made in transcending the gulf between the local and the global through engaging in episodes of internal violence.

Keywords

Critical Security Studies, Post-Colonialism, India, Responsible, Global Society, Local Conflict.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Acharya, Amitava and Barry Buzan (2010): ―Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An Introduction‖, in Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on South Asia and Beyond. Edited by Acharya and Buzan, London and New York, Routledge.
  • Ashcroft, Bill et al (2000): Post-Colonial Studies: Key Concepts, London and New York, Routledge.
  • Bigo, Didier (2002): ―Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease‖, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27 (Special Issue): 63-92.
  • Booth, Ken (2007): Theory of World Security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Brass, Paul (2003): The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India, Seattle, University of Washington Press.
  • Browning, Christopher and Matt McDonald (2011): ―The future of critical security studies: Ethics and the politics of security‖, European Journal of International Relation,19 (2): 235-255.
  • Coser, Lewis (1957): ―Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change‖, The British Journal of Sociology, 8 (3): 197-207.
  • Epp, Rogers (2002): ―The English School on the frontiers of international society‖, in The Eighty Years‘ Crisis: International Relations 1919-1999. Edited by Tim Dunne et al., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Floyd, Rita (2007): ―Towards a Consequentialist Evaluation of Security: Bringing Together the Copenhagen and the Welsh Schools of Security Studies‖, Review of International Studies, 33 (2): 327-350.
  • Gandhi, Leela (1998): Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction, Crows Nest, Allen and Unwin.
  • Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith (1990):Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Hurrell, Andrew (2006): ―Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-Be Great Powers?‖, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 82 (1): 1-19.
  • Mavelli, Luca and Fabio Petito (2012): ―The Post-Secular in International Relations: An Overview‖, Review of International Studies, 38 (5): 931-942.
  • McDonald, Matt (2008): ―Securitisation and the Construction of Security‖, European Journal of International Relations, 14 (4): 563-587.
  • Narlikar, Amrita (2013): ―India Rising: Responsible to Whom?‖, International Affairs, 89 (3): 595-615.
  • Pandey, Gyanenedra (2002): Remembering Partition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Seth, Sanjay (2011): ―Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations‖, Millennium Journal of International Studies, 40 (1): 167-183.
  • Smith, Steve (1996): ―Positivism and Beyond‖, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond.
  • Edited by Steve Smith et al, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • ---------------- (1999): ―The increasing insecurity of security studies: Conceptualizing security in the last twenty years‖, Contemporary Security Policy, 20 (3): 72101.
  • ---------------- (2002): ―US and the Discipline of IR: Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline‖, International Studies Review, 4 (2): 67-85.
  • Spivak, Gayatri (1988): ―A Literary Representation of the Subaltern‘‖, in Subaltern Studies. Edited by Ranajit Guha, New Delhi, Oxford University Press.
  • Suganami, Hidemi (2011): ―Causal Explanation and Moral Judgement: Undividing a Division‖, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39 (3):717-734.
  • Waltz, Kenneth (1979): Theory of International Politics, Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley.

Abstract Views: 154

PDF Views: 0




  • Understanding Local Conflicts in International Relations: A Critical Security Studies Perspective

Abstract Views: 154  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Amna Sunmbul
School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India

Abstract


The role of local conflicts is important to understand sectional and communal differences in post-colonial societies. In spite of the rhetoric of democracy and secularism, state governance has not been successful in restraining instances of communal conflicts and also the incessant rise of jingoism and parochial tendencies within mainstream politics. The absence of a linear progression in the improvement of social relations between people, especially between religious communities is indeed puzzling. This problem has also engulfed the Indian state. These events not only contradict the image of India as a secular democratic state, but also question the legitimacy of conferring such designations as „responsible‟ and „rising‟ upon the Indian state. These internal conflicts throw light upon inherent deficiencies of the Indian state and raises apprehensions about its international perceptions. Rather than explaining this scenario, it is important to understand the background of such confrontation between communities. From the perspective of Critical Security Studies, it is possible to contextualise conflicts within post-colonial societies and understand their relevance in global society. In this paper, an attempt has been made in transcending the gulf between the local and the global through engaging in episodes of internal violence.

Keywords


Critical Security Studies, Post-Colonialism, India, Responsible, Global Society, Local Conflict.

References