International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Review on Dynamic Analysis of Rail Vehicle Coach


Affiliations
1 Mechanical Engineering Dept., AITAM, Tekkali, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Mechanical Engineering Department, Andhra University College of Engineering, Andhra Pradesh, India
3 Dept. of Mech. Engg, Amity School of Engg. and Tech., Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Noida, India
4 Mechanical Engineering Department, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Railway vehicle is one of the rigorously developing passenger and goods carrier in the past few centuries. Dynamic behaviour of the railway coach is a vital aspect in its design and also in terms of passenger safety and ride comfort. Dynamic response includes both deterministic and probabilistic analyses. Modal, harmonic and transient dynamic analysis is part of deterministic analyses, whereas random response using spectrum methods and power spectral density (PSD) is a probabilistic approach. This paper is an attempt to cover various modelling and simulation methods of the railway bogie and coach adopted by various researchers to understand the dynamic behaviour of the railway coach. Further, the research findings of various dynamic parameters obtained theoretically and practically against different inputs like sinusoidal and random inputs to the car body have been discussed. This forms a basis in understanding the development of railway coach design when one is interested in carrying out free and forced vibration analysis on the coach, as well as assists to optimize various design parameters of components like bogie, car body and suspension elements in terms of vehicle dynamics.

Keywords

Railway Coach, Review, Dynamic Analysis, Modelling, Simulation, Wheel-Rail System.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • A.H. Wickens. 2006. A history of railway vehicle dynamics, Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics, 5-39.

  • P.T. Broersen. 1976. Evaluation of Railway Systems Dynamics by Model Adjustment, Doctoral Thesis, Dept. of Mech. Engg., Delft University of Tech., WTHD 79.

  • H. True and J.C. Jensen. 1994. Chaos and asymmetry in railway vehicle dynamics, Periodica Polytechnica Ser. Transp. Engg., 22(1), 55-68.

  • E.C. Slivsgaard. 1995. On The Interaction Between Wheels and Rails in Railway Dynamics, PhD Thesis, Inst. of Math. Modelling, Technical University of Denmark.

  • A. Cai and G.P. Raymond 1992. Theoretical model for dynamic wheel/rail and track interaction, Proc. 10th Int. Wheelset Congress, Sydney, Australia.

  • J.C.O. Nielsen and A. Igeland. 1995. Vertical dynamic interaction between train and track - influence of wheel and track imperfections, J. Sound and Vibration, 187(5), 825-839. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1995.0566.

  • W. Zhai and X. Sun. 1993. A detailed model for investigating interaction between railway vehicle and track, Proc. 13th IAVSD Symp., 603-614.

  • Y.Q. Sun and M. Dhanasekar. 2002. A dynamic model for the vertical interaction of the rail track and wagon system, Int. J. Solids and Structures, 39, 1337-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00224-4.

  • C. Andersson and T. Abrahamsson. 2002. Simulation of interaction between a train in general motion and a track, Vehicle System Dynamics, 38(6), 433-455. https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.38.6.433.8345.

  • W.M. Zhai, K. Wang and C. Cai. 2009. Fundamentals of vehicle-track coupled dynamics, Vehicle System Dynamics, 47(11), 1349-1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110802621561.

  • R.C. Sharma. 2011. Ride analysis of an Indian railway coach using Lagrangian dynamics, Int. J. Veh. Structures & Systems, 3(4), 219-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.3.4.02.

  • R.C. Sharma. 2013. Sensitivity analysis of ride behaviour of Indian railway Rajdhani coach using Lagrangian dynamics, Int. J. Vehicle Structures & Systems, 5(3), 84-89. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.5.3.02.

  • H. Tsunashima. 2003. Dynamics of automated guide way transit vehicle with single-axle bogies, Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics & Mobility, Vehicle System Dynamics, 39(5), 365-397. https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.39.5.365.14146.

  • R. Žygienė, M. Bogdevičius and L. Dabulevičienė. 2014. A mathematical model and simulation results of the dynamic system railway vehicle wheel-track with a wheel flat, Civil and Transport Engg., 6(5), 531-537.

  • K. Popp, I. Kaiser, H. Kruse. 2003. System dynamics of railway vehicles and track, Archive of Applied Mechanics, 72, 949-961.

  • B.H. Kumar, B.S. Kumar and C. Sujatha. 2005. Lateral dynamic analysis of a typical Indian rail-road vehicle, Proc. 12th National Conf. Machines and Mechanisms, IIT Guwahati, 208-214.

  • K.V. Gangadharan, C. Sujatha, V. Ramamurti, 2004. Experimental and analytical ride comfort evaluation of a railway coach, 249, Proc. IMAC-XXII Conf. & Exposition on Structural Dynamics, Dearborn, Michigan.

  • A. Stribersky, F. Moser and W. Rulka. 2002. Structural dynamics and ride comfort of a rail vehicle system, Advances in Engg., Software, 33, 541-552.

  • K. Popp, K. Knothe and C. Pöpper. 2005. System dynamics and long-term behaviour of railway vehicles, track and subgrade: report on the DFG Priority Programme in Germany and subsequent research, Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, Vehicle System Dynamics, 43(6), 485-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110500143728.

  • S.S. Deshpande, S. Srikari, V.K. Banthia, K. Jagadeesh and N. Chowdhary. 2010. Investigation of effects of different braking systems on rail wheel spalling, Sastech. J., 9(2), 1-10.

  • A. Cera, G. Mancini, V. Leonardi and L. Bertini. 2008. Analysis of methodologies for fatigue calculation for railway bogie frames, Proc. World Congress on Railway Research, UIC 2008, R.1.1.3.2.

  • H.S. Han and J.S. Koo. 2003. Simulation of train crashes in three dimensions, Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, Vehicle System Dynamics, 40(6), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.40.6.435.17906.

  • R.C. Sharma and S. Palli and R. Koona. 2017. Stress and vibrational analysis of an Indian railway RCF bogie, Int. J. Vehicle Structures and Systems, 9(5), 296-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.9.5.06.

  • S.K. Sharma and A. Kumar. 2016. Dynamics analysis of wheel-rail contact using FEA, Procedia Engg., 144, 1119-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.076.

  • S.K. Sharma, R.C. Sharma, A. Kumar and S. Palli. 2015. Challenges in rail vehicle-track modeling and simulation, Int. J. Vehicle Structures and Systems, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.7.1.01.

  • S. Palli, R. Koona, R.C. Sharma and V. Muddada. 2015. Dynamic analysis of Indian railway Integral Coach Factory bogie, Int. J. Vehicle Structures & Systems, 7(1), 16-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.7.1.03.

  • S. Palli and R. Koona. 2015. Analyses of dynamic response of a railway bogie, Int. J. Vehicle Noise and Vibration, 11(2), 103-113.

  • U. Nackenhorst. 1993. On the finite element analysis of steady state rolling contact, Trans. Engg., Sci., 1, 53-60.

  • B. Zastrau, U. Nackenhorst and J. Jarewski. 1997. On the computation of elastic-elastic rolling contact using adaptive finite element techniques, Trans. Engg. Sci., 14, 129-138.

  • S. Damme, U. Nackenhorst, A. Wetzel and B.W. Zastrau. 2003. On the numerical analysis of wheel-rail system in rolling contact, System Dynamics and Long-Term Behaviour of Railway Vehicles, Track And Subgrade, Springer, 155-174.

  • P.S. Paul, M.D.M. Gift, C.P. Jawar and N.R. Sakthivel. 2002. Finite element analysis of bogie frame, Proc. 18th National Convention of Mech. Engg., 331-338.

  • K. Ramji, V.K. Goel, S. Rao and M.K. Naidu. 2007. Dynamic behaviour of railway coach and bogie frame using finite element analysis, J. The Institution of Engineers Part MC, 87, 7-17.

  • J.J. Kalker. 1990. Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact, Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7889-9.

  • J. Pombo and J. Ambrósio. 2005. Dynamic analysis of a railway vehicle in real operation conditions using a new wheel-rail contact detection model, Int. J. Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing, 1(1/2/3), 79-105.

  • V. Kumar and V. Rastogi. 2009. Investigation of vertical dynamic behaviour and modelling of a typical Indian rail road vehicle through bond graph, World J. Modelling and Simulation, 5(2), 130-138.

  • P. Ghate, S.R. Shankapal and M.H.M. Gowda. 2012. Failure investigation of a freight locomotive suspension spring and redesign of the spring for durability and ride index, Sastech J., 11(2), 23-29.

  • L. Sebesan and Y. Zakaria. 2014. Analysing the static behavior of a bogie frame by comparing two methods of simulations, Applied Mech. & Materials, 659, 243-249.

  • A. Gugliotta, A. Soma, P. Arrus and A. Lombardi. 1997. Simulation of rail dynamics at Politecnico of Torino, Proc. 12Mth European Adams Users Conf., Marburg.

  • G. Lu and K.F. Gill. 1993. Track-transmission system dynamic analysis, Proc. IMechE Part F: J. Rail & Rapid Transit, 207, 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1993_207_234_02.

  • S.K. Agrawal, Dr. G. Narayanan, C. Sujatha, A.M. Prasad. 2011. Rail-wheel interaction an investigation, Proc. National Tech. Seminar of IPWE, Banglore, India.

  • R.C. Sharma. 2013. Stability and eigenvalue analysis of an Indian railway general sleeper coach using Lagrangian dynamics, Int. J. Vehicle Structures & Systems, 5(1), 9-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.5.1.02.

  • V.K. Garg and R.V. Dukkipati 1984. Dynamics of Railway Vehicle Systems, Academic Press, Canada.

  • R.N. Iyengar and O.R. Jaiswal. 1995. Random field modelling of railway track irregularities, J. Transportation Engg., 121(4), 304-308. https://doi.org/ 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:4(303).

  • V.K. Goel, M. Thakur, K. Deep and B.P. Awasthi. 2005. Mathematical model to represent the track geometry variation using PSD, Indian Railway Technical Bulletin, 312-313, 1-10.


Abstract Views: 485

PDF Views: 264




  • A Review on Dynamic Analysis of Rail Vehicle Coach

Abstract Views: 485  |  PDF Views: 264

Authors

Srihari Palli
Mechanical Engineering Dept., AITAM, Tekkali, Andhra Pradesh, India
Ramji Koona
Mechanical Engineering Department, Andhra University College of Engineering, Andhra Pradesh, India
Sunil Kumar Sharma
Dept. of Mech. Engg, Amity School of Engg. and Tech., Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Noida, India
Rakesh Chandmal Sharma
Mechanical Engineering Department, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, India

Abstract


Railway vehicle is one of the rigorously developing passenger and goods carrier in the past few centuries. Dynamic behaviour of the railway coach is a vital aspect in its design and also in terms of passenger safety and ride comfort. Dynamic response includes both deterministic and probabilistic analyses. Modal, harmonic and transient dynamic analysis is part of deterministic analyses, whereas random response using spectrum methods and power spectral density (PSD) is a probabilistic approach. This paper is an attempt to cover various modelling and simulation methods of the railway bogie and coach adopted by various researchers to understand the dynamic behaviour of the railway coach. Further, the research findings of various dynamic parameters obtained theoretically and practically against different inputs like sinusoidal and random inputs to the car body have been discussed. This forms a basis in understanding the development of railway coach design when one is interested in carrying out free and forced vibration analysis on the coach, as well as assists to optimize various design parameters of components like bogie, car body and suspension elements in terms of vehicle dynamics.

Keywords


Railway Coach, Review, Dynamic Analysis, Modelling, Simulation, Wheel-Rail System.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.10.3.10