Information Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Quantitative Analysis of Bioinformatics Literature in India


Affiliations
1 Department of Library & Information Science, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram - 695034, Kerala, India
2 Library & Knowledge Centre, School of Distance Education, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 034, Kerala, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Examines quantitatively the growth and development of bioinformatics research in India in terms of the publication output as reflected in Web of Science (WoS) database for the period 2006-2010.The bibliographic details of 577bioinformatics data obtained from the WoS database were studied and it was found that among the total bioinformatics contributions, nearly half are from India. Majority of the contributions were multi- authored and the degree of collaboration was 0.93 and most of the publications were in the form of journal articles. BMC Bioinformatics pubhshed by Bio Med Central ranks first position with 28 publications followed by In Silico Biology (lOP press) with 24 publications. IISc, Bengaluru is the most productive bioinformatics research institute in the country followed by ISI, Kolkata. Delhi is the leading state with 6.41% of the total Indian contribution in bioinformatics followed by West Bengal with 5.37% publications. The data set has been found to be not a perfect fit for the Bradford's law of scattering.

Keywords

Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Scientometrics, Web of Science, Bradford's Law of Scattering.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Fenstermacher, D. (2005). Introduction to bioinformatics. Journal of American Society for Information Science & Technology, 52(8): 440-446.

  • Pachauri, D L. (2007). Introduction to bioinformatics. New Delhi: Pearl Books 2007.

  • Kirchner, M W. (2005). The meaning of systems biology. Cell, 12(1): 503-504.

  • Ouzounis, C.A. and Valencia, A. (2003). Early Bioinformatics: the birth of a discipline- a personal view. Bioinformatics Review, 19(7): 2176-2190.

  • Hood,W.W. and Wilson, C.S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and Informetrics, Scientometric, .52(2): 291-314.

  • Maharana, R.K. (2014). Malaria research in India during 2003-2012: A bibliometric analysis. Collection Building, 33(2): 24-31.

  • Kanakaraj, S. and Esmail S. Mohamed, A. (2014). Scientometric Analysis of Aquaculture Research Productivity: Study Based on Web of Knowledge Database. Journal of Advances in Library & Information Science, 3(1): 16-20.

  • Gupta, B.M. and Kaur Har. (2013). World Glaucoma research: a quantitative analysis of research output during 2002-2011. An«a/s of Library & Information Studies. 60(2): 98-106.

  • Shahabudein, S.M. (2013). Mapping neuroscience research in India: A bibliometric approach. Current Science, 104(12): 1619-1626.

  • Soumya Rani, G.L and Sudhier, K.G. (2012). Mathematics Research in India: A Scientometric Study. ST"" ILA National Conference on Knowledge Society: Innovations in Librarianship (ILAKSIL-2012}, St. Agnes College, Mangalore, 23-25 Feb, 2012, p295-301.

  • Sudhier, K.G. and Leena Ravi (2012). Indian contributions in Marine Fisheries Research: A scientometric analysis on ASFA Database. In Dynamics of Librarianship in the Knowledge Society: Festschrift in Honour of Prof B. Ramesh Babu. 4V. Dr. Achim Osswald and Dr. S. M. Zabed Ahmed, Eds. Delhi: B. R. Publishing Corporation, 2012. Vol. 4, pi 133-1150.

  • Bala, A. and Gupta, B.M. (2010) Research activities in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology during 1998-2007 in India: A Scientometric Analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 30(1): 3-14.

  • Arunachalam, S. (2009).Mathematics Research in India Today: What does the literature reveal? Scientometrics, 52(2): 229-235.

  • Glanzel, W; Janssens, F. and Thijis, B.A. (2009). Comparative analysis of publication activity and citation impact based on the core literature in bioinformatics. Scientometrics. 79(1): 109-129.

  • Kaliyaperumal, K. and Natarajan, K (2009). Scientometric analysis of literature output on retina. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology. 29(4): 33-36

  • Kaur, H. and Gupta, B.M. (2009). Indian Contribution in Immunology and Microbiology1999-2008: A Scientometric analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology. 29(5): 36-43.

  • Krishnamurthy, S.; Ramakrishna, J and Devi, S. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of diabetes (1995-2004). Annals of Library & Information Studies, 56(3): 150-55.

  • Gupta, B.M. and Dhawan, S.M. (2008). Condensed matter physics: An analysis of India's research output, 1993-2001. Scientometrics. 75(l):123-44.

  • Guan, Jand Gao, X. (2008). Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of Bioinformatics. Scientometrics. 75(2): 357-379.

  • Nazim, M. and Ahmad, M. (2008). A bibliometric analysis on nanotechnology research. Annals of Library & Information Studies, 55(4): 292-299.

  • Bansard, Jet al. (2007). Medical informatics and bioinformatics: A bibliometric study, lEE Transactions on Information Technology and Biomedicine, 11(3): 237-243.

  • Kademani, B.S. et al. (2007). Mapping of Indian publications in S&T: A Scientometric analysis of publications in Science Citation Index. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 27(1): 17-34.

  • Patra, S.K. and Chand, P. (2007). HIV/AIDS research in India: A bibUometric study. Library & Information Science Research. 29: 124-134.

  • Garg, K.C.; Suresh Kumar and Kashmiri Lai. (2006). Scientometric profile of Indian agricultural research as seen through Science Citation Index expanded. Scientometrics. 68(1): 151-166.

  • Kademani, B.S. et al. (2006). Scientometric dimensions of Nuclear Science and Technology research in India: A Study based on IMS (1970-2002) database. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. 11(1): 23-48.

  • Patra, S.K. and Mishra, S. (2006). Bibliometric study of bioinformatics literature. Scientometrics, 67(3): 477-489.

  • Gupta, B M and Dhawan, S.M. (2005). A Scientometric analysis of computer research output during the period 1994-2001. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 25(1): 3-11.

  • Patra, S.K. and Bhattacharya. (2005). Bibliometric study of cancer research in India. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 25(2): 11-18.

  • Arunachalam, S. and Umarani, K. (2001). Status of Mathematics research in India in 1990 and 1994: An analysis based on MathSci. Information Today& Tomorrow, 20(4): 23-30.

  • Karki, M. et al. (2000). Activity and growth of organic chemistry research in India during 91l-l989. Scientometrics. 49(2): 279-88.

  • Web of Science, Available at: http://thomsonreuters.com/thomson-reuters-web-of-science/ (Accessed on February 5, 2014)

  • Bradford, S C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering. 137(3550): 85-86.


Abstract Views: 296

PDF Views: 0




  • A Quantitative Analysis of Bioinformatics Literature in India

Abstract Views: 296  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Manya R. Gopal
Department of Library & Information Science, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram - 695034, Kerala, India
K. G. Pillai Sudhier
Library & Knowledge Centre, School of Distance Education, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 034, Kerala, India

Abstract


Examines quantitatively the growth and development of bioinformatics research in India in terms of the publication output as reflected in Web of Science (WoS) database for the period 2006-2010.The bibliographic details of 577bioinformatics data obtained from the WoS database were studied and it was found that among the total bioinformatics contributions, nearly half are from India. Majority of the contributions were multi- authored and the degree of collaboration was 0.93 and most of the publications were in the form of journal articles. BMC Bioinformatics pubhshed by Bio Med Central ranks first position with 28 publications followed by In Silico Biology (lOP press) with 24 publications. IISc, Bengaluru is the most productive bioinformatics research institute in the country followed by ISI, Kolkata. Delhi is the leading state with 6.41% of the total Indian contribution in bioinformatics followed by West Bengal with 5.37% publications. The data set has been found to be not a perfect fit for the Bradford's law of scattering.

Keywords


Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Scientometrics, Web of Science, Bradford's Law of Scattering.

References