Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Web-Based Ranking and Link Analysis of Central Universities in India:A Webometric Analysis
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Describes briefly the Indian higher educational system mentioning various types of universities having their websites. Web presence of Indian universities has been discussed in general and central universities in particular. Webometric data have been collected mainly through Yahoo! search engines using special query syntax. An attempt has been made to rank central universities in India using appropriate webometric indicators. Results revealed that based on WISER ranking University of Delhi gets top rank; Sikkim University occupied the last rank among central universities in India. The study also examined the link relationship through inlinks and outlinks among central universities using personal web crawler i.e. SocSciBot 3.0. The reason for hyper-linking is traced among the universities under study. . Finally, co-link matrix was formed to detect the link pattern among the central universities in India.
Keywords
Webometric Analysis, University Ranking, Central University, Link Analysis, ADM and WIF.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- Almind, T.C. and Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: Methodological approaches to Webometrics, Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 404-26.
- Bar-Ilan, J. (2004). What do we know about links and linking? A framework for studying links in academic environment. Information Processing and Management, 41(4), 973-986
- Chu, H. (2005). Taxonomy of inlinked web entities: what does it imply for webometric research? Library and Information Science Research, 27(1), 8-27.
- Hemeriks (2(K)5). Knowledge production and communication in the information society: Mapping communications in heterogeneous research networks. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
- Heimeriks, Horlesberger, and Van Den Besselaar (2003). Analyzing hyperlink networks: The meaning of hyperlink based indicators of knowledge production. Cybermetrics, 10(1), 1.
- Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of Web Impact Factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(2), 236-43.
- Harrison, C. (2002). Hypertext links: Whither Thou Guest and Why. First Monday, 7(10). Available: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_10/harrison/index.html. Accessed 10 September 2009
- Henzinger, M.R. (2001). Hyperlink analysis for the Web. IEEE Internet computing, JanFeb 2001,45-50
- Jalal, S.K., Biswas S.C. and Mukhopadhyay, P.S (2009a). Webometric indicators for ranking of accredited Indian universities: An evaluatory study. XXVII All India Conference of lASLIC on Library/ Information Users in Digital Era organized By KIIT University, •', Bhubaneswar dated 26-29 Dec 2009
- Jalal, S.K., Biswas S.C. and Mukhopadhyay, P.S (2009b). Web presence of selected Asian countries: A Webometric study. Fifth International conference on WIS and 10th COLLNET meeting, 13-16 Sept. 2009.
- Kim, H.J. (2000). Motivations for hyper-linking in scholarly electronic articles: a qualitative study. JASIS, 51(10), 887-99.
- Kousha, K and Horri, A. (2004). The relationship between scholarly publishing and the •.-•:: . counts of academic inlinks to Iranian university web sites: Exploring academic link creation motiaiions. Journal of Information Management and Scientometrics, 1(2), 13-22.
- Leydesdorff, L. & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information sciences: Extending ACA to the Web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Scicence and Technology, 57(12), 1616-1628. http://users.fmg.uva.nl/lleydesdorff/aca/index.htm
- Li, X., Thelwall. M., Musgrove P.and Wilkinson D. (2003). The reladonship between the links/Web Impact Factors of computer science departments in UK and their RAE (Research Assessment Exercise) ranking in 2001. Scientometrics, 57(2), 239-255
- Mukhopadhyay, P.S. (2004). Measuring Web Impact Factors: a webometric study based on the analysis of hyperlinks. In. National Seminar On Information Support For Rural Development, India. lASLIC, Dec 2004.
- Park, H.W. (2002). Examining the determinants of who is hyperlinked to whom: a survey of webmasters in Korea. First Monday, 7(11). Accessible at: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_l 1/park/. Accessed 10 September 2009
- Polanco, X., Boudourides, M.,Besagni, D., and Roche, L(2001). Clustering and mapping European university websites sample for displaying associations and visualizing networks.
- Ranking Web of World universities, http://www.webometrics.info/methodology.html Accessed 10 September 2009
- Smith, A. (1999). A tale of two Web spaces: comparing sites using Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 55(5), 577-5922
- Tang, R and Thelwall, M. (2003). Disciplinary differences in US academic departmental web site interlinking. Library and Information Science Research, 25(4), 437-458.
- Thelwall, M. (2001). Conceptualizing documentation on the web: an evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university websites. JASIST, 53(12), 995-1005
- Thelwall, M. (2002). A comparison of sources of links for academic Web Impact Factor calculations. Journal of Documentation, 58(1), 60-72
- Thelwall, M. (2003). What is this link doing here beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation? Information Research, 8(3).
- Thelwall, M., Tang, R. and Price, E. (2003). Linguistic patterns of academic web use in Western Europe. Scientometrics, 56(3), 417-432.
- Thomas, O. and Willett, P. (2000). Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science. Journal of Information Science. 26(6), 421-28
- University Grants Commissions of India, http://www.ugc.ac.in. (Accessed 10 September 2009)
- Vaughan, L and Thelwall. M. (2003). Scholarly use of the web: What are the key inducers of links to journal web sites? yA5/5r, 54(1), 29-38.
- Vaughan, L. (2007). Why are websites co-linked? The Case of Canadian universities. Scientometrics, 72(1), 81-92.
- Wilkinson, D., Thelwall, M. and Li, X. (2003). Exploiting hyperiinks to study academic Web use. Social Science Computer Review, 21(3); 340-351.
- WISER (2005). Web Indicators for Scientific Technological and Innovation Research: A Survey of Practice, December 2005.
Abstract Views: 217
PDF Views: 0