International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Developments in Mechanization of Root and Tuber Crop Peeling Machine


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The ischolar_main and tuber crops are of immense importance with respect to their varying utility and nutritional aspects. This review is aimed at discussing the developments in mechanization of peeling systems for the ischolar_main and tuber crops in food processing related industries and at house hold. The ischolar_main and tuber crops are produced in significant amount in India and world. Production of ginger, potato and sweet potato in India for the year 2017-2018 was 1075 MT, 49344 MT and 1465 MT, respectively. These crops are consumed in all over world for their peculiar characteristics. These ischolar_main and tuber crops are rich sources of phytochemicals and bioactive compounds which are reported to have many health benefits. Many of these ischolar_main and tuber crops are covered by a protective covering or peel which in general is inedible and is of less significance in view point nutrition. Hence, before further processing or consumption usually this peel is removed. The peel is removed by many methods like manual, mechanical, thermal and chemical. Being high level of heterogeneity in the structure of ischolar_main and tuber crops like ginger, potato and sweet potato peeling processes face a numerous problems. There had been considerable developments in mechanization of peeling systems, however each of these with certain shortcomings. Mechanical peeling is more efficient (75-80%) with minimum loses, easy to operate and other advantages. This review will help in finding the pros and cons of various in mechanized peeling systems and future scope for improvement in these systems.

Keywords

Peeling, Processing, Ginger, Potato, Sweet Potato.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adetoro, K.A. (2012). Development of a yam peeling machine. Global Adv. Res. J. Engg., Technol. & Innovation, 1(4): 085-088

  • Agricoop.gov.in/Area and Production of Horticulture Crops-All India 2016-17(Final) and 2017-18 (First Adv. Est.)

  • Balami, A.A., Dauda, S.M., Mohammed, I.S., Agunsoye, J.K., Abu, H., Abubakar, I. and Ahmad, D (2014). Design and fabrication of a cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) peeling machine. Internat. Food Res. J., 23: S65-S70

  • Barreiro, J. A., Sandoval, A. J., Rivas, D. and Rinaldi, R. (2007). Application of a mathematical model for chemical peeling of peaches (Prinus persia L.) variety Amarillo Jarillo. J. Food & Sci. Technol., 40: 574-578.

  • Barreiro, J.A., Caraballo, Vianca and Sandoval , Aleida J. (1995). Mathematical model for the chemical peeling of spherical foods. J. Food Engg., 25(4):483-496.

  • Ben-Shalom, N., Levi, A. and Pinto, R. (1986). Pectolytic enzyme studies for peeling of grapefruit segment membrane. J. Food Sci., 51: 421-423.

  • Chakraborty, Chaitali, Roychowdhury, Rupsa, Chakraborty, Suravi , Chakravorty, Srostuti and Ghosh, Debjit (2017). A review on post-harvest profile of sweet potaro. Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 6(5): 1894-1903.

  • Das, D.J. and Barringer, S.A. (2006). Potassium hydroxide replacement for lye (sodium hydroxide) in tomato peeling. J. Food Processing & Preservation, 30: 15-19.

  • Dvid O’Beirne, Gleeson, E., Auty, M. and Jordan, K. (2014). Effects of processing and storage variables on penetration and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in fresh-cut packaged carrots. Food Control, 40:71-77.

  • Emadi, B., Kosse, V. and Yarlagadda, P. (2007). Abrasive peeling of pumpkin. J. Food Engg., 79(2) : 647-656.

  • Emadi, B., Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. and Yarlagadda, P. K. D. V. (2008). Mechanical peeling of pumpkins. Part 1: Using an abrasive-cutter brush. J. Food Engg., 89: 448-452.

  • FAO (2008). Potatoes, nutrition and diet, International Year of the Potato.

  • Floros, J.D. and Chinnan, M.S. (1990).Diffusion phenomena during chemical (NaOH) peeling of tomatoes. J. Food Sci., 55: 552-553.

  • Garrote R.L., Coutaz V.R., Luna J.A., Silva E.R., Bertone R.A. (1993). Optimizing processing conditions for chemical peeling of potatoes using response surface methodology. J. Food Sci., 58 : 821-826.

  • Garrote, R.L., Coutaz, V. R., Silva, E.R. and Bertone, R.A. (1994). Determining Process Conditions for Chemical Peeling of Asparagus. LWT- Food Sci. & Technol., 27(1):19-22.

  • Garrote, R. L., Silva, E. R., Bertone, R. A. and Avalle, A. (1997). Effect of time and number of cycles on yield and peeling quality of steam peeled potatoes and asparagus. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie, 30: 448-451.

  • Garrote, R.L., Silva, E.R. and Bertone, R.A. (2000). Effect of thermal treatment on steam peeled potatoes. J. Food Engg/. 45 : 67-76.

  • Ghazavi, M.A/ (2010). Evaluating physical properties of potato by a combined tillage machine; Nat. & Sci., 8(11).

  • ICAR-Indian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode - 673 012, Kerala.November 2015.

  • Jayashree, E. and Visvanathan, R. (2014). Studies on development of concentric drum, brush type ginger peeler. Agric. Mechanization Asia, Africa, & Latin America, 45 (4): 82-87.

  • Kaur, S., Sarkar, B.C., Sharma, H.K. and Singh, C. (2009). Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis pretreatment conditions for enhanced juice recovery from guava fruit using response surface methodology. Food & Bioprocess Technol.,2: 96-100.

  • Klaiber, R.G., Baur, S., Wolf, G., Hammes, W.P. and Carle, R. (2005). Quality of minimally processed carrots as affected by warm water washing and chlorination. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg Technol., 6: 351-362.

  • Lynn, P. Brandenberger and Eric J. Rebek (2014). Sweet Potato Production; ResearchGate.

  • McArdle, R.N. and Culver, C.A. (1994). Enzyme infusion: A developing technology. Food Technol., 11: 85-89.

  • O'Beirne, D., Gleeson, E., Auty, Mark A.E. and Jordan, Kieran N. (2014). Effects of processing and storage variables on penetration and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in fresh-cut packaged carrots. Food Control, 40(1) : 71-77.

  • Onu Olughu Onu and Kayode Joshua Simonyan (2015). Full Length Research Paper on Performance evaluation of a motorized ginger juice expression machine. African J. Agric., 10(37) : 3662-3670.

  • Prakash, S., Singhal, R.S. and Kulkarni, P.R. (2001). Enzymic peeling of Indian grapefruit (Citrus paradist). J. Sci. Food & Agric., 81 : 1440-1442.

  • Pretel, M.T., Lozano, P., Riquelme, F. and Romojaro, F. (1997). Pectic enzymes in fresh fruit processing: Optimization of enzymic peeling of oranges. Process Biochem., 32: 43-49.

  • Pretel, M.T., Amoros, A., Botella, M.A., Serrano, M. and Romojaro, F. (2005). Study of albedo and carpelar membrane degradation for further application in enzymatic peeling of citrus fruits. J. Sci. Food & Agric., 85: 86-90.

  • Rouhana, A. and Mannheim, C.H. (1994). Optimization of enzymatic peeling of grapefruit. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie, 27: 103-107.

  • Somsen, D., Capelle, A. and Tramper, J. (2004). Manufacturing of par-fried French-fries. Part 2: Modeling yield efficiency of peeling. J. Food Engg., 61: 199-207.

  • Shirmohammadi, M., Yarlagadda, P.K., Kosse, V. and Gu, Y. (2012). Study of mechanical deformations on tough skinned vegetables during mechanical peeling process. GSTF J. Engg. Technol., 1 : 31-37.

  • Singh, K.K. and Shukla, B.D. (1995). Abrasive peeling of potatoes. J. Food Engg., 26 : 431-442

  • Soffer, T. and Mannheim, C.H. (1994). Optimization of enzymatic peeling of oranges and pomelo. LebensmittelWissenschaft und-Technologie, 27: 245-248.

  • Suutarinen, M., Mustranta, A., Autio, K., Salmenkallio-Marttila, M., Ahvenainen, R. and Buchert, J. (2003). The potential of enzymatic peeling of vegetables. J. Sci. Food & Agric., 83 : 1556-1564.

  • Talodhikar, V.P., Gorantiwar, V.S. and Dhole, L.P. (2017). Mechanization and Development Of Potato Peeling Machine: A Review. Internat. J. Engg. & Innovative Technol. (IJEIT) 6 (9).

  • Tapia, M.R., Gutierrez-Pacheco, M.M., Vazquez-Armenta, F.J., Aguilar, G.A. Gonzalez, Zavala, J.F. Ayala, Mohammad Shafi ur Rahman and Siddiqui, Mohammed Wasim (2015). Washing, Peeling and Cutting of Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables: ResearchGate DOI: 10.13140/2.1.3857.4406.

  • Toker, I. and Bayindirli, A. (2003). Enzymatic peeling of apricots, nectarines and peaches. Lebensmittel- Wissenschaft und-Technologie, 36 : 215-221.


Abstract Views: 279

PDF Views: 0




  • Developments in Mechanization of Root and Tuber Crop Peeling Machine

Abstract Views: 279  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ishwar Shinde
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India
Hanuman Bobade
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India
Sachin Patil
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India

Abstract


The ischolar_main and tuber crops are of immense importance with respect to their varying utility and nutritional aspects. This review is aimed at discussing the developments in mechanization of peeling systems for the ischolar_main and tuber crops in food processing related industries and at house hold. The ischolar_main and tuber crops are produced in significant amount in India and world. Production of ginger, potato and sweet potato in India for the year 2017-2018 was 1075 MT, 49344 MT and 1465 MT, respectively. These crops are consumed in all over world for their peculiar characteristics. These ischolar_main and tuber crops are rich sources of phytochemicals and bioactive compounds which are reported to have many health benefits. Many of these ischolar_main and tuber crops are covered by a protective covering or peel which in general is inedible and is of less significance in view point nutrition. Hence, before further processing or consumption usually this peel is removed. The peel is removed by many methods like manual, mechanical, thermal and chemical. Being high level of heterogeneity in the structure of ischolar_main and tuber crops like ginger, potato and sweet potato peeling processes face a numerous problems. There had been considerable developments in mechanization of peeling systems, however each of these with certain shortcomings. Mechanical peeling is more efficient (75-80%) with minimum loses, easy to operate and other advantages. This review will help in finding the pros and cons of various in mechanized peeling systems and future scope for improvement in these systems.

Keywords


Peeling, Processing, Ginger, Potato, Sweet Potato.

References