Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Economic Evaluation of Cluster Front Line Demonstrations on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Faridkot District of South Western Punjab
Subscribe/Renew Journal
A study was conducted in South Western Punjab (India) during 2016-18 to assess the economic performance of clusterwise front line demonstration on chickpea (var PBG-7). One hundred ninety five front line demonstrations (FLDs) were conducted at farmers’ fields to demonstrate the effect of improved technologies on the productivity of chickpea using cluster village approach in Faridkot district of Punjab duringRabi 2016-17 and 2017-18. The productivity of chickpea under demonstration plots ranged between 11.9 to 13.2 q and 12.2 to 14.1 q/ha during year 2016-17 and 2017-18, respectively, whereas, under farmers’ practice the productivity varied from 9.5 to 10.7 q and 9.0 to 11.2 q/ha for respective years. The extension gap in the demonstration plots over potential yield was the lowest i.e., 1.8 q/ha in cluster I, whereas, the highest extension gap was recorded in cluster II (3.35q/ha) while the average extension gap over all the clusters was 2.57q/ha. The highest value of technology gap of 7.95 q/ha was recorded in cluster I, however, the least value was recorded in cluster IV (6.35) with the average technology gap of 7.10 q/ha over all the clusters. The technology index (%) was 31.75 for cluster IV, 33.50 for V, 35.5 for III, 37.0 for II and the highest, 39.75 per cent for cluster I, while, the mean technology index was 35.5 per cent. The value of net returns per ha under demonstration plots was Rs. 23550 and Rs. 26310, whereas, farmers practice gave net returns of Rs.14110 and Rs.14180 per ha, respectively, for the years 2016-17 and 2017-18. The benefit : cost ratio ranged from 1.80 to 2.00 for 2016-17 and 1.81 to 2.10 for 2017-18 under demonstration plots while the value of same varied between 1.42 to 1.59 and 1.31 to 1.63 under farmers’ practice for year 2016-17 and 2017-18, respectively.
Keywords
Cluster Front Line Demonstrations, Chickpea, Productivity, Economic Evaluation.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Balai, C.M., Meena, R.P., Meena, B.L. and Biarwa, R.K. (2012). Impact of front line demonstrations on rapeseed and mustard yield improvement. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 12(2) :113-116.
- Balai, Kuldeep, Jajoria, M., Verma, R., Deewan, P. and Bairwa, S.K. (2017). Nutrient content, uptake, quality of chickpea and fertility status of soil as influenced by fertilization of phosphorus and zinc. J. Pharmacognosy & Phytochemistry, 6 (1) : 392-398.
- Choudhary, A.K.,Yadav, D.S. and Singh, Amar (2009). Technological and extension yield gaps in oil seeds in Mandi districtof Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Soil Cons., 37(3):224-229.
- Choudhary, B.N. (1999). Krishi Vigyan Kendra– A guide for KVK managers. Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR, New Delhi, India, pp. 73-78.
- Dhakad, S.S., Asati, K.P., Chouhan, S.S., Badaya, A.K., Kirar, K.S. and Ambawatia, G.R. (2018). Impact of front line demonstration on the yield and economics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in tribal area of Madhya Pradesh, India. Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci.,7(5): 3662-3666.
- Egamberdieva, D., Shurigin, V., Gopalakrishnan, S. and Sharma R. (2014). Growth and symbiotic performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars under saline soil conditions. J. Biological & Chemical Research, 31(1): 333-341.
- Fatima, Z., Bano, A., Sial, R. and Aslam, M. (2008).Response of chickpea to plant growth regulators on nitrogen fixation and yield. Pakistan J. Botany, 40 (5): 2005-2013.
- Hiremath, S.M. and Nagaraju, M.V. (2010).Evaluation of onfarm front line demonstrations on the yield of chilli. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23 (2): 341-342.
- Jeengar, K.L., Panwar, P. and Pareek, O.P. (2006). Front line demonstration on maize in Bhilwara district of Rajsthan. Curr. Agric., 30 (1/2):115-116.
- Khaitov, Botir, Akhmad, Kurbonov, Anvar, Abdiev and Maksud, Adilov (2016). Effect of chickpea in association with Rhizobium to crop productivity and soil fertility. Eurasian J. Soil Sci., 5 (2) : 105 - 112.
- Khoja, J.R., Khangarot, S.S., Gupta, A.K. and Kulhari, A.K. (2002). Effect of fertility and biofertilizers in growth and yield of chickpea. Ann. Pl. Soil Res., 4(2) : 357-358.
- Kirar, B.S., Narshine, R., Gupta, A.K. and Mukherji, S.C. (2006). Demonstration: An effective tool for increasing the productivity of Urd. Ind.Res.J. Extn. Edu., 6(3):47-48.
- Mokidue, I., Mohanty, A.K. and Sanjay, K. (2011).Correlating growth, yield and adoption of urd bean technologies. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 11 (2): 20-24.
- Poonia, T.C. and Pithia, M.S. (2011). Impact of front line demonstrations of chickpea in Gujarat. Legume Res., 34(4): 304-307.
- Raj, A.D., Yadav, V. and Rathod, J.H. (2013). Impact of front line demonstration (FLD) on the yield of pulses. Internat. J. Scient. & Res. Public., 3 (9):1-4.
- Reddy, A.A. (2010). Regional disparities in food habits and nutritional intake in Andhra Pradesh, India. Regional & Sectoral Economic Studies, 10 (2) : 125-134 .
- Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mondal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation of front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180-183.
- Singh, A.K., Manibhushan, Bhatt B.P., Singh, K.M. and Upadjaya, A. (2013). An analysis of oil seeds and Pulses scenario in Eastern India during 2050-51. J. Agril Sci., 5 (1) : 241-249.
- Singh, A.K., Singh, S.S., Ved Prakash, Kumar and Dwivedi, S.K. (2015). Pulses production in India: Present status, Bottlenecks and Way Forward. J. Agrisearch, 2(2):75-83.
- Singh, Beena, Singh, Y.K. and Panigarhi, T.K. (2014).Extent of adoption of recommended practices of pulses through FLD. IOSR J. Agric. & Veterinary Sci.,7 (12) :71-72 .
- Singh, Dharminder, Singh, K.B., Gill, N.S. and Grewal, I.S. (2017). Impact analysis of frontline demonstrations on pulses in Punjab. Internat. J.Farm Sci., 7(1): 190-194.
Abstract Views: 336
PDF Views: 0