Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Studies on the Effect of Storage on Viability of Wettable Powder (WP) Formulations of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschinikoff) Sorokin


Affiliations
1 Agricultural Research Station, Niphad, Nasik (M.S.), India
2 Department of Entomology, AICRP on Soybean,Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Studies on the effect of storage of developed Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin 5 per cent WP formulation A1(M30S1/1C1/2) and B1(M30S1/1H1/1) (comprising adjuvants, fungus and kaolinite) and M.anisopliae alone in kaolinite (control) on viability of the fungus are undertaken.At 10 DAI, surface coverage by the fungus varied from 100 to 45.0, 100 to 46.67 and 100 to 0.0 per cent in formulation A1, B1 and control, respectively, when stored for 0 to 300 days. The samples stored upto 150 days showed cent per cent surface coverage in formulation A1 and B1 except control. Significantly higher biomass (9.10 to10.03 g/40ml medium) was produced in samples of formulation A1 and B1 (8.77 to 10.07g) stored upto 210 days as compared to that (3.40g) in formulation A1 and B1 (3.70g) stored for 300 days. The biomass in control was 6.27g in fresh sample against no biomass in sample stored for 300 days. The viability varied from 31.33 to 5.33x108, 30.67 to 6.33x108and 30.67 to 0.0x108cfu/ml in formulation A1, B1 and control, respectively, from 0 to 300 days storage. Considering surface coverage (%), biomass produced and viability (cfu/g) the M. anisopliae 5 pe cent WP formulation A1, B1 and control could be stored upto 10, 10 and 6 months, respectively for the minimum cfu count of 1x108/g for WP formulations as per norms.

Keywords

Metarhizium anisopliae, Adjuvants, Formulation, Wettable Powder, Sunflower Oil, Honey, Carboxymethyl Cellulose, Colony Forming Unit.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aly, S.H. and Rashad, A.M. (1997). Effect of (Metarhizium anisopliae) on two stages of Earias insulana (Lepidoptera-Nectuidae). Analele Institutului de Cercetari pentru Cereale Protectia Plantelor, 28 (2) : 203-211.
  • Anonymous (2003). Biopesticide, Agrolook, 4(1) : 4-5.
  • Batt,Y.A. (2003). Production and testing of novel formulations of the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). Crop Prot., 22 (2): 415-422.
  • Daust, A.R., Ward, G.M. and Roberts,W.D. (1983). Effect of formulation on theviability ofMetarhizium anisopliae conidia. J. Invertebrate Pathol., 41: 151-160.
  • Ekesi,S., Adamu,R.S. and Maniania,N.K. (2002). Ovicidal activity of entomopathogenic hyphomycetes to the legume pod borer, Marucavitrata and the pod sucking bug, Clavigralla tomentosicollis. Crop Protec., 21 (7) : 589-595.
  • Gopalkrishnan, C. and Narayan, K. (1987). Studies on the dose, age relationship Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschikoff) Sorokin Var. anisopliae Tullock against Heliothisarmigera Hub. (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Seminar cum sixth workshop on Biological control of crop pests and weeds.GujratAgril. University, Anand.
  • Hajek, A.E. and Lager, R.J.(1994). Interactions between fungal pathogen and insect hosts. Annual Rev. Entomol., 39 : 293-322.
  • Hall, I.M. and Bell, I.V. (1961). Further studies on the effect of temperature on the growth of some entomophthoraceous fungi. J. Insect Pathol., 3: 289-296.
  • Loureiro, E.S. and MoinoJunior, A. (2006). Pathogenicity of hyphomycet fungi toaphids Aphis gossypii Glover and Myzuspersicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Neotropical Entomology, 35 (5) : 660-665.
  • McCoy, C.W, Samsom, R.A. and Bourias, D.G. (1988). Entomogenous fungi, In “CRC Handbook of natural pesticides, Microbial insecticide, part-A Entomogenous Protozoaand fungi,”C.M. Ignoffo, (Ed.), 5 :151-236.
  • Metschniko, E. (1879). Maladies des hannetons ble. Zapiski imperatorskogo obshchestua sel’ska Khozyaistra yuzhnoi rossii, 17–50.
  • Ming Guang Feng, L.R., Johnso, J.B. and Kish, L.P. (1990). The virulence of Verticillium lecanii and an aphid derived isolate of Beauveria bassiana for six species of cereal infecting aphids. J. Environ. Entomol., 19 (3): 815-820.
  • Moore, D., Bridge, P. D., Higgins, P. M., Bateman, R. P. and Prior, C. (1993). Ultra-violetradiation damage toMetarhizium flavoviridae conidia and the protection given by vegetable and mineral oils and chemical sunscreens. Ann. Appl. Biol., 122 : 605-616.
  • Pandey, A.K. and Kanaujia, K.R. (2004). Sensitivity of aphid, Lipaphiserysimi (Kalt.)to Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin conidiospore. Appl. Biological Res., 6 (1/2) : 7-10.
  • Pandey, K.A. and Kanujia, K. (2005). Effect of different grain media on sporulation, germination and virulence of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin against Spodoptera (Fab.) larvae. J. Biological Control, 19 : 129-133.
  • Rachappa,V., Lingappa, S. and Patil, R.K. (2007). Influence of carrier materials andstorage temperature on conidial viability of fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae. J. Ecobiol., 20 (2) : 133-138.
  • Shabana,Y.M., Charudattan, R., Devalerio, J.T. and Elawakil, M.A. (1977). Anevaluation of hydrophilic polimars for formulating the bioherbicide agents Aternaria cassia and A. eichhorniae.Weed Technol., 11: 212-220.
  • Silva,V.C.A., Barros, R., Marques, E.J. and Torres, J.B. (2003). Susceptibility of Plutellaxylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to the fungi Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. and Metarhiziumanisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. Neotropical Entomol., 32 (4) : 653-658.
  • Ujjan, A.A. and Saleem Shahzad (2007). Pathogenicity of Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum strains on pink hibiscus mealy bug (Maconellicoccus hirsutus) affecting cotton crop. Pakistan J. Botany, 39 (3) : 967-973.
  • Wickramatileke, W.S.N., Ahangama, D. and Banda, D.M.G.A. (2000). Evaluation of the effectiveness of entomopathogenic fungus (Metarhizium anisopliae var. major) on cabbage semilooper (Chrysodeixiseriosoma Doubl.). Tropical Agric. Res., 12 : 177-185.

Abstract Views: 281

PDF Views: 0




  • Studies on the Effect of Storage on Viability of Wettable Powder (WP) Formulations of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschinikoff) Sorokin

Abstract Views: 281  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. D. Patil
Agricultural Research Station, Niphad, Nasik (M.S.), India
R. S. Jadhav
Department of Entomology, AICRP on Soybean,Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India

Abstract


Studies on the effect of storage of developed Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin 5 per cent WP formulation A1(M30S1/1C1/2) and B1(M30S1/1H1/1) (comprising adjuvants, fungus and kaolinite) and M.anisopliae alone in kaolinite (control) on viability of the fungus are undertaken.At 10 DAI, surface coverage by the fungus varied from 100 to 45.0, 100 to 46.67 and 100 to 0.0 per cent in formulation A1, B1 and control, respectively, when stored for 0 to 300 days. The samples stored upto 150 days showed cent per cent surface coverage in formulation A1 and B1 except control. Significantly higher biomass (9.10 to10.03 g/40ml medium) was produced in samples of formulation A1 and B1 (8.77 to 10.07g) stored upto 210 days as compared to that (3.40g) in formulation A1 and B1 (3.70g) stored for 300 days. The biomass in control was 6.27g in fresh sample against no biomass in sample stored for 300 days. The viability varied from 31.33 to 5.33x108, 30.67 to 6.33x108and 30.67 to 0.0x108cfu/ml in formulation A1, B1 and control, respectively, from 0 to 300 days storage. Considering surface coverage (%), biomass produced and viability (cfu/g) the M. anisopliae 5 pe cent WP formulation A1, B1 and control could be stored upto 10, 10 and 6 months, respectively for the minimum cfu count of 1x108/g for WP formulations as per norms.

Keywords


Metarhizium anisopliae, Adjuvants, Formulation, Wettable Powder, Sunflower Oil, Honey, Carboxymethyl Cellulose, Colony Forming Unit.

References