Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Measuring Conditional Volatility using GARCH (2, 2) Model from Empirical Standpoint


Affiliations
1 SRIMCA UkaTarsadia University, Gujarat., India
 

The article covers the broader aspect of time-variant volatility function using GARCH (2, 2) vo-latility function. The postulate of conditional heteroskedasticity and autoregressive in relation to residual distribution is examined for four listed daily stock prices from Indian markets namely Infosys, TCS, HDFC and Tata Motors. The basic aim of the paper is to understand how the GARCH (2, 2) model perform as against the unconditional volatility and whether any volatility clusters appear in the price series. The overall idea of using a GARCH (2, 2) is to observe the lag orders for 2 days across conditional mean (first order) and conditional volatility (second order) autocorrelation effects across four prominent stocks. Also, to observe the static parameters and their role in defining the conditional elasticity of errors in the univariate setup. The results clearly highlighted that volatility clustering was observed at different time period defining the role of macroeconomic information and price adjustments with mean-reversion effects.

Keywords

Mean-reversion, GARCH (2, 2), Heteroskedasticity, Conditional volatility
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Suna, P., & Zhou, C. (2009). How to apply GARCH model in risk management? Tang, Dragon, and Hong Yan, (2007), Liquidity and credit default swap spreads, Working Paper.
  • Vošvrda, M., &Žikeš, F. (2004). An application of the GARCH-t model on Central European stock returns. Prague Economic Papers, 1, 26-39.
  • Laplante, J., Desrochers, J., &Préfontaine, J. (2008). The GARCH (1, 1) model as a risk predictor for international portfolios. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 7(11), 23-34.
  • Huang, K. (2011). Modeling volatility of S&P 500 index daily returns: a comparison between models based forecasts and implied volatility. Finance and Statistics, Hanken School of Econom-ics.
  • Aiube, F. L., Baidya, T. K., Blank, F. F., Mattos, A. B., Saboia, W., & Siddiqui, A. S. (2013). Modeling Hourly European Electricity Spot Prices via a SARMA-GARCH Approach. (Http: //wwwenrimaproject.eu/sites/default/files/paper_apr.
  • Tsai, H., & Chan, K. S. (2008). A note on inequality constraints in the GARCH model. Econo-metric Theory, 24(3), 823-828.

Abstract Views: 107

PDF Views: 66




  • Measuring Conditional Volatility using GARCH (2, 2) Model from Empirical Standpoint

Abstract Views: 107  |  PDF Views: 66

Authors

Vijay Gondalia
SRIMCA UkaTarsadia University, Gujarat., India

Abstract


The article covers the broader aspect of time-variant volatility function using GARCH (2, 2) vo-latility function. The postulate of conditional heteroskedasticity and autoregressive in relation to residual distribution is examined for four listed daily stock prices from Indian markets namely Infosys, TCS, HDFC and Tata Motors. The basic aim of the paper is to understand how the GARCH (2, 2) model perform as against the unconditional volatility and whether any volatility clusters appear in the price series. The overall idea of using a GARCH (2, 2) is to observe the lag orders for 2 days across conditional mean (first order) and conditional volatility (second order) autocorrelation effects across four prominent stocks. Also, to observe the static parameters and their role in defining the conditional elasticity of errors in the univariate setup. The results clearly highlighted that volatility clustering was observed at different time period defining the role of macroeconomic information and price adjustments with mean-reversion effects.

Keywords


Mean-reversion, GARCH (2, 2), Heteroskedasticity, Conditional volatility

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.31794/NLDIMSR.2.2.2018.35-38