International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis of Marketable and Marketed Surplus of Rice in Ghazipur District of Eastern Uttar Pradesh


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant University of Agricultural and Technology, Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand), India
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda (U.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Rice is primarily, a high energy or high caloric food. It contains less protein than wheat. The by-product of rice milling are used for a varieties of purposes. Rice is life: reflects the importances of rice as a primary source. Data were collected from 100 sample farms spread over 8 village of Sadat block. The overall average size of farms and average number of sample farm families were 1.47 ha 11.37, respectively. Overall farms cropping intensity were found to be 192.93 per cent. Marketable and marketed surplus trends were increasing with increase size of farms. Per farm marketable surplus was observed to be 3.74, 28.86, 32.27 and 125.45 quintals under marginal, small, medium and large size of sample farms, respectively with an average of 19.60 quintals. Per farm marketed surplus was observed to be 6.18, 27.97, 30.52 and 108.90 quintals under marginal, small, medium and large size of sample with an overall average of 19.70 quintal. Marginal farmers were sold more than the marketable surplus to meet their cash obligations and re-purchase the rice from the market in a later period to meet their family and/or farm requirements. It has been observed that the from period December to February covers the maximum disposal of unhusked rice by all size groups of farmers.

Keywords

Marketable, Marketed, Surplus of Rice.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Acharya, S.S. and Agarwal, N.L. (2005).Agricultural marketing in India, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, pp. 52.

  • Bajpai, B.K. (1994). Regional variations in foodgrains, marketable and marketed surplus in Uttar Pradesh. Bihar J. Agril. Mktg., 2 (2): 153-163.

  • Chattopadhyay, M. and Sen, I. (1988). Marketable surplus and size-classes of holdings. Econ. & Polit. Weekly, 23 (52 & 53) : 24-31.

  • Kumar, Pramod and Kumar, P. (1999). Marketed surplus of different crops across farm size: a study in Haryana. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 54 (4): 500-521.

  • Mishra, P.K. and Nahatkar, S.B. (1998). Extent of marketable and marketed surplus of wheat and gram in Jabalpur division of Madhya Pradesh. Bihar J. Agric. Mktg., 6 (1): 39-42.

  • Negi, Y.S., Tewari, S.C. and Sharma, L.R. (1989). Marketable and marketed surplus of wheat and maize in Paonta valley of Himachal Pradesh. Economic Affairs, Calcutta, 34 (2): 108-111.

  • Sadhu, A.N. and Singh, A. (2000). Fundamentals of agricultural economics, Himalaya Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.

  • Singh, G.S. (1994). A comparative study of marketable and marketed surplus of bajra and wheat in Mahewa block of Etawah district (U.P.). Indian J. Agric.Mktg., 8 (1): 101-107.


Abstract Views: 605

PDF Views: 1




  • Analysis of Marketable and Marketed Surplus of Rice in Ghazipur District of Eastern Uttar Pradesh

Abstract Views: 605  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant University of Agricultural and Technology, Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand), India
Rahul Kumar Rai
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda (U.P.), India

Abstract


Rice is primarily, a high energy or high caloric food. It contains less protein than wheat. The by-product of rice milling are used for a varieties of purposes. Rice is life: reflects the importances of rice as a primary source. Data were collected from 100 sample farms spread over 8 village of Sadat block. The overall average size of farms and average number of sample farm families were 1.47 ha 11.37, respectively. Overall farms cropping intensity were found to be 192.93 per cent. Marketable and marketed surplus trends were increasing with increase size of farms. Per farm marketable surplus was observed to be 3.74, 28.86, 32.27 and 125.45 quintals under marginal, small, medium and large size of sample farms, respectively with an average of 19.60 quintals. Per farm marketed surplus was observed to be 6.18, 27.97, 30.52 and 108.90 quintals under marginal, small, medium and large size of sample with an overall average of 19.70 quintal. Marginal farmers were sold more than the marketable surplus to meet their cash obligations and re-purchase the rice from the market in a later period to meet their family and/or farm requirements. It has been observed that the from period December to February covers the maximum disposal of unhusked rice by all size groups of farmers.

Keywords


Marketable, Marketed, Surplus of Rice.

References