International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Factors Influencing Farm Investment in Borrower and Non-Borrower Farm Firms in Tamil Nadu


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, COIMBATORE (T.N.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Investment plays a vital role in the agricultural production process. It induces production and savings, further investment helps in the development of the economy. It plays an equally important role in farm economy especially in the era of technological revolution. The study was attempted to assess the impact of farm finance and investment on profitability of farms in Annur block of Coimbatore district. This block was purposively selected for the study since it has the highest number of borrowers for agriculture purpose from commercial banks and it also has the highest loan amount given for agricultural purposes. From the selected block, four villages were selected randomly for the study. The tools of analysis included conventional percentage analysis, returns to investment, net cash income. The borrower farms depend more on the Commercial banks (55.00 %) to meet their farm investment and it was followed by Regional Rural Banks (15.00 %) and Co-operative Banks (15.00 %). The contribution of relatives and friends to the total farm investment was 12.50 per cent and the money lenders contributed about 2.50 per cent to the total farm investment in the borrower farm firms. The gross income was calculated for the borrower and non-borrower farms, the results revealed that borrowers had higher gross income (Rs. 314301.07) than that of the non-borrowers (Rs. 208116.40). The major contributor of income for the borrowers was crop income (45.04 %), which was followed by livestock income (34.90 %) and then by non-farm and off farm income (20.06 %). In the non-borrowers crop income contributed (57.82 %) of the total income, followed by livestock income (25.62 %) and then by non-farm and off farm income (16.56 %). Returns from the investment were higher in case of the borrower farms as the returns from investment ratio was 1.61, whereas in the non-borrowers it was 1.15. The net cash income obtained was also higher in the borrower farms (Rs. 154818.75) than that of the non- borrower farms (Rs. 92980.67).

Keywords

Conventional Percentage Analysis, Returns to Investment, Net Cash Income.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Feder, Gershon, Law, L., Lin, J. and Luo, X. (1991). Credit effect on productivity in Chinese agriculture-A macro economic model of development Department. J. Develop. Econ., 32 (5) : 34-67.

  • Gryseels, G., Getachew Assamchew, Andurson, F., Akebe Misgina, Berham W. Kidana, Sayers, R. and Woldeab Wolde Mariam (1988). Role of live stock on mixed small holder farms in the Ethiopia highlands : A case study from Baeo and Worens Woreda near Debre Berham, Highlands Programme, ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246 pp. (ILCA Library Accession number 40389)

  • Muhammad, Ahmad, Munir and Abbas (2003). The impact of institutional credit on agricultural production in Pakistan. Pakistan Institute Develop. Econ., 12(7):34-36.

  • Muhammad, W. Siddiqi, Mazhar-ul-Haq and Naheed Baluch, K. (2004). Institutional credit: A policy tool for enhancement of agricultural income of Pakistan. Internat. Res. J. Arts & Humanities, (IRJAH), 37 : 163-173.

  • Report of the Expert Group, on Investment Credit, (2013). Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai.

  • Subba, S. Reddy and Raghu Ram, P. (2005). Agricultural finance and management, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.: 62-130.

  • Subba, S. Reddy, Raghu Ram, P., Neelakanda Sastry, T.V. and Bhavani Devi, I. (2004). Agricultural economics, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. : 343-345.

  • Statistical Hand book of Tamil Nadu (2013-14), Government of Tamil Nadu.

  • Verma, S.R. (1980). Impact of agricultural mechanization on production, productivity, cropping intensity, income generation and employment of labour. Punjab Agric. Univ., Ludhiana, 7(2):123-125.


Abstract Views: 309

PDF Views: 0




  • Factors Influencing Farm Investment in Borrower and Non-Borrower Farm Firms in Tamil Nadu

Abstract Views: 309  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

R. Sangeetha
Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, COIMBATORE (T.N.), India
B. Kavitha
Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, COIMBATORE (T.N.), India
T. R. Shanmugam
Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, COIMBATORE (T.N.), India

Abstract


Investment plays a vital role in the agricultural production process. It induces production and savings, further investment helps in the development of the economy. It plays an equally important role in farm economy especially in the era of technological revolution. The study was attempted to assess the impact of farm finance and investment on profitability of farms in Annur block of Coimbatore district. This block was purposively selected for the study since it has the highest number of borrowers for agriculture purpose from commercial banks and it also has the highest loan amount given for agricultural purposes. From the selected block, four villages were selected randomly for the study. The tools of analysis included conventional percentage analysis, returns to investment, net cash income. The borrower farms depend more on the Commercial banks (55.00 %) to meet their farm investment and it was followed by Regional Rural Banks (15.00 %) and Co-operative Banks (15.00 %). The contribution of relatives and friends to the total farm investment was 12.50 per cent and the money lenders contributed about 2.50 per cent to the total farm investment in the borrower farm firms. The gross income was calculated for the borrower and non-borrower farms, the results revealed that borrowers had higher gross income (Rs. 314301.07) than that of the non-borrowers (Rs. 208116.40). The major contributor of income for the borrowers was crop income (45.04 %), which was followed by livestock income (34.90 %) and then by non-farm and off farm income (20.06 %). In the non-borrowers crop income contributed (57.82 %) of the total income, followed by livestock income (25.62 %) and then by non-farm and off farm income (16.56 %). Returns from the investment were higher in case of the borrower farms as the returns from investment ratio was 1.61, whereas in the non-borrowers it was 1.15. The net cash income obtained was also higher in the borrower farms (Rs. 154818.75) than that of the non- borrower farms (Rs. 92980.67).

Keywords


Conventional Percentage Analysis, Returns to Investment, Net Cash Income.

References