Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Online Learning Environments for the Promotion of Undergraduate Research in Pandemic Times : A Case Study in an Engineering Program


Affiliations
1 Civil Engineering Program, Universidad de Lima, Peru
2 Architecture Program, Universidad de Lima, Peru
3 Civil Engineering Program, Universidad de Lim, Peru
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This case study explores the use of online learning environments as an alternative tool for the promotion of undergraduate research culture within an engineering program during the COVID-19 pandemic times. This context entailed the transition from face-to-face to online learning environments, which was taken as an opportunity for the diffusion and socialization of outstanding research projects developed by undergraduate students within the classroom, through the launching of an online event and a virtual permanent exhibition. The results of this case study were measured through quantitative indicators related to the number of research projects submitted by the students for participating in this exhibition, the number of courses participating through these projects, and the number of professors involved. Participation of students and professors increased by 85% and 90%, respectively, comparing the online environment to the previous face-to-face one. Consequently, it was concluded that the use of online learning environments supports the promotion of undergraduate research culture, by increasing the interest of students for the socialization of their research results.

Keywords

Engineering Education, Lifelong Learning, Online Learning Environments, Research Competencies, Research Culture, COVID-19.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amer, T. (2007). E-learning and education. Dar Alshehab Publication.

  • Al-rahmil, W., Othman, M., Yusocf L. and Musa, M. (2015). Using Social Media as a Tool for Improving Academic Performance through Collaborative Learning in Malaysian Higher Education, Review of European Studies; 7(3).

  • Ambrosini, V. and Bowman, C. (2010). Using teaching case studies for management research. Strategic Organization, 8(3), 206-229.

  • Booth, C., Bowie, S, Jordan J. and Rippin, A. (2000). The use of the case method in large and diverse undergraduate business programmes: problems and issues. The International Journal of Management Education, 1, 62–75.

  • Breen, R., and Lindsay, R. (1999). Academic research and student motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 75–93.

  • Chen, T. (2003). Recommendations for creating and maintaining effective networked learning communities: A review of the literature. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(1), 35–44.

  • Collins, J., Brown, N. and Leigh J. (2021). Making sense of cultural bumps: Supporting international graduate teaching assistants with their teaching, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, DOI:10.1080/14703297.2021.1919175

  • Deem, R., Mok, K. and Lucas, L. (2008). Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the ‘world-class’ university in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 83 – 97.

  • Del Savio A.A., Cáceres, L. and Galantini, K. (2021). Methodological Proposal for the Gradual Acquisition of Research Competencies in Undergraduate Civil Engineering Students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 1201–1214.

  • Del Savio, A. A., Galantini Velarde, K., Díaz-Garay, B., & Valcárcel Pollard, E. (2022). A Methodology for Embedding Building Information Modelling (BIM) in an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Program. Applied Sciences, 12(23), 12203. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app122312203

  • Fajardo A., Paez C., Fajardo N., Perilla G., Hurtado J., Perez M (2022). Case study: An explor a tory-de s c riptive study on the engineering students' perceptions about online assessment during the COVID-19. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. Vol. 35, Issue: 3, Pg: 88-99.

  • Falcone, F., Vazquez, A., García, J. and Lopez-Martin, A. (2019). Implementation of Higher Education and Life Long Learning Curricula based on University-Industry Synergic Approach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 1568-1583.

  • Geschwing, L. and Brostrom, A. (2015). Managing the teaching-research nexus: ideals and practice in research-oriented universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.

  • González, J., Galindo, N., Galindo, J. and Gold, M. (2004). Los paradigmas de la calidad educativa. De la autoevaluación a la acreditación. Mexico City: Union of Latin American Universities.

  • Hattie, J. and Marsh, H.W. (2004). One Journey to Unravel the Relationship between Teaching and Research. Research and teaching: closing the divide? An international colloquium.

  • Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, ed. R. Barnett, 30–42. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

  • Henderson, M., Selwyn, N. and Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, DOI:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

  • Hesli, V. L. and Lee, J. M. (2011). Faculty research productivity: Why do some of our colleagues publish more than others. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(02), 393–408. doi:10.1017/S1049096511000242

  • Hernández, R., Fernández, C. and Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación [Research methodology]. Mexico City: McGraw-Hill.

  • Ishiyama, J. (2002). Does early participation in undergraduate research benefit social science and humanities students? College Student Journal, 36 (3), 380+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A95356589/AONE?u=anon~350fdc3f&sid=googleScholar&xid=c60e0af6

  • Jenkins, A, and Healey, M. (2005). Institutional Strategies to Link Teaching and Research. York, England: The Higher Education Academy.

  • Jenkins, A., Healey, M. and Zetter, R. (2007). Linking Teaching and Research in Disciplines and Departments. York, England: The Higher Education Academy.

  • John, J. and Creighton, J. (2011). Researcher development: the impact of undergraduate research opportunity programmes on students in the UK, Studies in Higher Education, 36(7), 781-797, DOI:10.1080/03075071003777708

  • Jones J., Morales C. and Knezek, G. (2005). 3‐Dimensional online learning environments: examining attitudes toward information technology between students in Internet‐based 3‐dimensional and face‐to‐face classroom instruction, Educational Media International, 42 (3), 219-236, DOI:10.1080/09523980500161254

  • Kang, X. and Zhang, W. (2020) An experimental case study on forum-based online teaching to improve student’s engagement and motivation in higher education, Interactive Learning Environments, D O I : 10.1080/10494820.2020.1817758

  • Khoukhi, A. (2013). A structured approach to honours undergraduate research course, Evaluation rubrics and assessment. Journal of Science Education Technology, 22, 630-650.

  • Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J.W., Kreijns, K., and Beers, P.J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 52(3), 47–66.

  • Knight, D. B., and Novoselich, B. J. (2017). Curricular and cocurricular influences on undergraduate engineering student leadership. Journal of Engineering Education, 106, 44-70.

  • Lacka E. and Wong, T. (2019). Examining the impact of digital technologies on students' higher education outcomes: the case of the virtual learning environment and social media. Studies in Higher Education, DOI:10.1080/03075079.2019.1698533

  • Leszczyński, P., Charuta, A., Łaziuk, B., Gałązkowski, R., Wejnarski, A., Roszak, M., and Kołodziejczak, B. (2018). Multimedia and interactivity in distance learning of resuscitation guidelines: A randomised controlled trial. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 151–162. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1337035

  • Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): First Findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 270–277. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045

  • Mesny, A. (2013). Taking Stock of the Century-Long Utilization of the Case Method in Management Education. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 30, 56-66.

  • Prosser, M., and Trigwell, K. (2014). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67, 783–795.

  • Proyecto Tuning (2013). Reflexiones y Perspectivas de la Educación Superior en América Latina. Bilbao, Spain: Universidad de Deusto.

  • Ro, H. K., Merson, D., Lattuca L.R. and Terenzini P.T. (2015). Validity of the contextual competence scale for engineering students, Journal of Engineering Education, 104, 35-54.

  • Ruiz, M. (2009). El proceso curricular por competencias. México D.F.: Trillas.

  • Smedley, J. (2010). Modelling the impact of knowledge management using technology. OR Insight, 23 (4), 233–250. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2010.11

  • Stanford, J., Rocheleau, S., Smith, K. and Mohan, J. (2015). Early undergraduate research experiences lead to similar learning gains for STEM and Non-STEM undergraduates, Studies in Higher Education, DOI:10.1080/03075079.2015.1035248

  • Thornton, K., Walton, J., Wilson, M. and Jones, L. (2018). Middle leadership roles in universities: Holy Grail or poisoned chalice. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(3), 208-223

  • Tobón Tobón, S. (2013). Metodología de gestión curricular. Una perspectiva socioformativa. Mexico City: Trillas.

  • Tobón Tobón, S. (2017). Eva lua c ión socioformativa: estrategias e instrumentos. Mount Dora, U.S.A.: Kresearch.

  • UNESCO (2023). E-learning. Geneva, Switzerland.: International Bureau of Education.

  • Universidad de Lima. (2016). Plan Estratégico Institucional. Lima, Perú.: Universidad de Lima.

  • Universidad de Lima (2021). From https://www.expocicul.com/

  • Universidad de Lima (2021). From https://repositorio.ulima.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12724/8951

  • Vartiainen, H., Tedre, M., Kahila, J. and Valtonen, T. (2020). Tensions and trade-offs of participatory learning in the age of machine learning, Educational Media International, 57 (4), 285-298, DOI:10.1080/09523987.2020.1848512

  • Vereijken, M. W. C., Van der Rijst, R. M., De Beaufort, A.J., Van Driel, J. H. and Dekker, F. W (2018). Fostering first-year student learning through research integration into teaching: Student perceptions, beliefs about the value of research and student achievement, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 425-432, DOI:10.1080/14703297.2016.1260490

  • Vereijken, M. W. C., Van der Rijst, R. M., De Beaufort, A.J., Van Driel, J. H. and Dekker, F. W (2020). Authentic research practices throughout the curriculum in undergraduate medical education: Student beliefs and perceptions, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57 (5), 532-542, DOI:10.1080/14703297.2019.1674680

  • Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., and Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders’ analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 26–36.

  • Waite, S. and Davis, B. (2006). Developing undergraduate research skills in a faculty of education: Motivation through collaboration. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(4), 403 – 19.

  • Walther, J., Kellam, N., Sochacka, N. and Radcliffe, D. (2011). Engineering competence? An interpretive investigation of engineering students' professional formation. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 703-740.

  • Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICTinto teaching and learning, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45 (4), 411-419, DOI:10.1080/14703290802377307

  • Wiedenbeck, S., and Scholtz, J. (1995). Introducing undergraduates to research: A case study from the field of human-computer interaction. Computers & Education, 24(1), 37–49, DOI:10.1016/0360-1315(94)00054-c

  • Wilson, J., Wu, Y., Xie, J., Johnson, D. and Huijser, H. (2017). Inspiring learning through research and enquiry : The Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF) at Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU). In Carnell B. and Fung D. (Eds.), Developing the Higher Education Curriculum: Research-Based Education in Practice (pp. 46-59). London: UCL Press.

  • Yarullin, I., Bushmeleva N and Tsyrkun I. (2015). The research competence: Development of students trained in mathematical direction. Mathematics Education, 10(3), 137-146.

  • Zhu, J., Zhao, H., Wang, X., Yang, L., Qin, Z. and Geng J. (2022) Effects of Online Learning on College Students in Eastern China: A Structural Equation Model. Frontiers in Public Health 10 : 853928. doi : 10.3389/fpubh.2022.853928

  • Zimbardi, K. and Myatt, P. (2014). Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: a cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation, Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 233-250, DOI:10.1080/03075079.2011.651448


Abstract Views: 164

PDF Views: 0




  • Online Learning Environments for the Promotion of Undergraduate Research in Pandemic Times : A Case Study in an Engineering Program

Abstract Views: 164  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

L. Cáceres Montero
Civil Engineering Program, Universidad de Lima, Peru
K. Galantini Velarde
Architecture Program, Universidad de Lima, Peru
A. Reátegui Arrué
Civil Engineering Program, Universidad de Lim, Peru
A. A. Del Savio
Civil Engineering Program, Universidad de Lim, Peru

Abstract


This case study explores the use of online learning environments as an alternative tool for the promotion of undergraduate research culture within an engineering program during the COVID-19 pandemic times. This context entailed the transition from face-to-face to online learning environments, which was taken as an opportunity for the diffusion and socialization of outstanding research projects developed by undergraduate students within the classroom, through the launching of an online event and a virtual permanent exhibition. The results of this case study were measured through quantitative indicators related to the number of research projects submitted by the students for participating in this exhibition, the number of courses participating through these projects, and the number of professors involved. Participation of students and professors increased by 85% and 90%, respectively, comparing the online environment to the previous face-to-face one. Consequently, it was concluded that the use of online learning environments supports the promotion of undergraduate research culture, by increasing the interest of students for the socialization of their research results.

Keywords


Engineering Education, Lifelong Learning, Online Learning Environments, Research Competencies, Research Culture, COVID-19.

References