Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Early Miocene Shell Concentration in the Mixed Carbonate-Siliciclastic System of Kutch and their Distribution in Sequence Stratigraphic Framework


Affiliations
1 Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai - 400 076, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The Early Miocene succession of Kutch represents a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic depositional system. The carbonate part of the succession, characterized by high abundance of shallow marine benthic fauna, hosts typical shell concentrations (also referred as shell beds). The thickness of shell concentrations vary in scale from 5 cm to 100 cm and are separated by poorly fossiliferous to barren silty shales/siltstones. Based on taphonomic and sedimentological observations, shell concentrations are classified as lag, event, composite/multi-event and hiatal types. The occurrence of different types of shell concentrations in the background of sequence stratigraphic framework is the main theme for the present study. Overall, the shell concentrations occupy the middle part of the sequence i.e. upper part of the transgressive systems tract and lower part of the highstand systems tract. Lag concentrations are found in the lower part of the sequence while composite concentrations, the major contributors in the sequence, occur in upper part of the transgressive systems tract and in the lower part of the highstand systems tract. The hiatal concentrations are associated with maximum flooding surface while the position of event concentrations is independent of sequence stratigraphic framework. The shell concentrations occupy marine flooding surface or marine ravinement surface, thus mark parasequence boundaries.

Keywords

Shell Concentration, Mixed Carbonate-Siliciclastic System, Systems Tract, Early Miocene, Kutch, Gujarat.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • BANERJEE, I. and KIDWELL, S.M. (1991) Significance of molluscan shell beds in sequence stratigraphy: an example from the Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group of Canada. Sedimentology, v.38, pp.913-934.
  • BEHRENSMEYER, A.K. and KIDWELL, S.M. (1985) Taphonomy's contributions to Paleobiology. Paleobiology, v.11, pp.105- 119.
  • BEHRENSMEYER, A.K., KIDWELL, S.M. and GASTALDO, R.A. (2000) Taphonomy and Paleobiology, In: D.A. Erwin and S.L Wing (Eds.), Deep Time-Paleobiology's perspective. Supplement to Paleobiology, v.26, pp.103-147.
  • BEST, M.M.R. and KIDWELL, S.M. (2000a) Bivalve taphonomy in tropical mixed siliciclastic-carbonate settings, I. Environmental variation in shell condition. Paleobiology, v.26, pp.80-102.
  • BEST, M.M.R. and KIDWELL, S.M. (2000b) Bivalve taphonomy in tropical mixed siliciclastic-carbonate settings, II. Effect of bivalve life habits and shell types. Paleobiology, v.26, pp.103- 115.
  • BISWAS, S.K. (1992) Tertiary stratigraphy of Kutch. Jour. Palaeont. Soc. India, v.37, pp.1-29.
  • BRANDT, D.S. (1989) Taphonomic grades as a classification for fossiliferous assemblages and implications for paleoecology. Palaios, v.4, pp.303-309.
  • BRETT, C.E. and BAIRE, G.C. (1998) Sequence stratigraphy, paleoecology, and evolution: biotic clues and response to sealevel fluctuations. Palaios, v.13, pp.241-262.
  • CANTALAMESSA, G., DI CELMA C. and RAGAINI, L. (2005) Sequence stratigraphy of the Punta Ballena Member of the Jama Formation (Early Pleistocene, Equador): insights from integrated sedimentologic, taphonomic and paleoecologic analysis of molluscan shell concentrations. Palaeogeo., Palaeoclimat., Palaeoeco., v.216, pp.1-25.
  • CATUNEANU, O. (2006) Principles of Sequence stratigraphy. 1st Edition, Elsevier, Oxford, 374p.
  • DEVIES, D.J., POWELL, E.N. and STANTON, R.J., Jr. (1989) Taphonomic signature as a function of environmental processes: shell and shell beds in a hurricane-influenced inlet on the Texas coast. Palaeogeo., Palaeoclimat., Palaeoeco., v.72, pp.317-356.
  • DI CELME, C., RAGAINI, L., CANTALAMESSA, G. and CURZIO, P. (2002) Shell concentration as tool in characterizing sedimentary dynamics at sequence-bounding unconformities: example from the lower unit of the Canoa Formation (Late Pliocene, Ecuador). Spec. Mem., Geobios, v.24, pp.72-84.
  • EMERY, D. and MYERS, K.J. (1996) Concepts and principles of sequence stratigraphy. In: D. Emery and K. J. Myers, (Eds.), Blackwell Science. pp.11-41.
  • FURSICH, F.T. and OSCHMANN, O. (1993) Shell beds as tools in basin analysis: the Jurassic of Kachchh, western India. Jour. Geol. Soc. London, v.150, pp.169-185.
  • FURSICH, F.T. and PANDEY, D.K. (2003) Sequence stratigraphic significance of sedimentary cycles and shell concentrations in the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous of Kachchh, western India. Palaeogeo., Palaeoclimat., Palaeoeco., v.193, pp.285- 309.
  • HANDFORD, C.R. and LOUKS, R.G. (1993) Carbonate depositional sequence and system tract-response of carbonate platforms to relative sea-level change, In: R.G. Louks and J.F. Sarge (Eds.), Carbonate Sequence Stratigraphy: Recent Development and Applications. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Mem., v.57, pp.49- 212.
  • HISAO, A. and KONDO, Y. (1999) Shell concentrations and depositional sequences. How shell concentrations are distributed within depositional sequences? Geol. Soc. Japan Mem., v.54, pp.7-28.
  • KIDWELL, S.M. (1991) The stratigraphy of shell concentrations, In: P.A. Allison and D.E.G. BRIGGS (Eds.), Taphonomy. Releasing the data locked in the fossils record. Plenum Press, New York, pp.115-209.
  • KIDWELL, S.M., FURSICH, F.T. and AIGNER, T. (1986) Conceptual framework for the analysis and classification of fossils concentrations. Palaios, v.1, pp.228-238.
  • KIDWELL, S.M. and HOLLAND, S.M. (1991) Field description of coarse bioclastic fabrics. Palaios, v.6, pp.426-434.
  • KONDO. Y., ABBOTT, S. T., KITAMARU, A., KAMP, P.J.J., NAISH, T.R., KAMATAKI, T. and SAUL, S.G. (1998) The relationship between shell bed type and sequence architecture: examples from Japan and New Zealand. Sedimentary Geol., v.122, pp.109-127.
  • KUMAR, P., SARASWATI, P.K. and BANERJEE, S. (2006) Characterization of Early Miocene shell concentration of mixed carbonate-siliciclastic sequence of Kutch India. International Sedimentological Congress, Fukuoka-Japan, p.82.
  • MELDAHL, K.H. (1987) Sedimentologic and taphonomic implications of biogenic stratification. Palaios, v.2, pp.305- 358.
  • MELDAHL, K.H. (1993) Geographic gradients in the formation of shell concentrations: Plio-Pleistocene marine deposits, Gulf of California. Palaeogeo., Palaeoclimat., Palaeoeco., v.101, pp.1-25.
  • NORRIS, R.D. (1986) Taphonomic gradients in shelf fossil assemblages: Pliocene Purisima Formation, California. Palaios, v.1, pp.256-270.
  • PARRAS, A. and CASADIO, S. (2005) Taphonomy and sequence stratigraphic significance of oyster-dominated concentrations from the san Julian formation, Oligocene of Pantagonia, Argentina. Palaeogeo., Palaeoclimat., Palaeoeco., v.217, pp.47- 66.
  • RAJU, D.S.N. (1974) Study of Indian Miogypsinoidae, Kutch. In: C.W. Drooger (Ed.), Utrecht micropaleontological Bulletine. Krips Repro Meppel, Netherlands, v.9, pp.13-53.
  • RAJU, D.S.N. (2008) High resolution Bio-Chrono- and biosequence stratigraphy and sea-level changes: Global vs Indian record-present and future of microfaunal and palynological research. ONGC Bull., v.43(1), pp.10-43.

Abstract Views: 191

PDF Views: 0




  • Early Miocene Shell Concentration in the Mixed Carbonate-Siliciclastic System of Kutch and their Distribution in Sequence Stratigraphic Framework

Abstract Views: 191  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pramod Kumar
Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai - 400 076, India
Pratul Kumar Saraswati
Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai - 400 076, India
Santanu Banerjee
Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai - 400 076, India

Abstract


The Early Miocene succession of Kutch represents a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic depositional system. The carbonate part of the succession, characterized by high abundance of shallow marine benthic fauna, hosts typical shell concentrations (also referred as shell beds). The thickness of shell concentrations vary in scale from 5 cm to 100 cm and are separated by poorly fossiliferous to barren silty shales/siltstones. Based on taphonomic and sedimentological observations, shell concentrations are classified as lag, event, composite/multi-event and hiatal types. The occurrence of different types of shell concentrations in the background of sequence stratigraphic framework is the main theme for the present study. Overall, the shell concentrations occupy the middle part of the sequence i.e. upper part of the transgressive systems tract and lower part of the highstand systems tract. Lag concentrations are found in the lower part of the sequence while composite concentrations, the major contributors in the sequence, occur in upper part of the transgressive systems tract and in the lower part of the highstand systems tract. The hiatal concentrations are associated with maximum flooding surface while the position of event concentrations is independent of sequence stratigraphic framework. The shell concentrations occupy marine flooding surface or marine ravinement surface, thus mark parasequence boundaries.

Keywords


Shell Concentration, Mixed Carbonate-Siliciclastic System, Systems Tract, Early Miocene, Kutch, Gujarat.

References