Journal of Indian School of Political Economy

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

National Accounts Series:A Review and Highlights of Crucial Issues for Debate


Affiliations
1 EPW Research Foundation, Mumbai, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The latest re-basing of India’s National Accounts series from 2004-05 to 2011-12 has been one of the most radical changes introduced ever in the adoption of new data sources as well as in the application of new concepts based on international guidelines for the revisions in the methodology of their compilation. These changes have aroused unusual misgivings and considerable debate amongst the academic circles and in the media. This paper seeks to provide an exposition of the rationale for the changes introduced so that there is better appreciation of the same, and at the same time, attempt some critical evaluation of the revisions made so that we could offer constructive suggestions for improving the overall results including, wherever necessary, the quality of estimates.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Alagh, Y.K., 2015; "The alarming investment slide", Business Line, 10 June.

  • Anant, T C A, 2015; "Don’t Compare New GDP Data Series with Old", The Economic Times, 14 April.

  • Anant, T C A, 2016; "Government making efforts to reduce discrepancies in GDP data", The Economic Times, 3 June.

  • Anant, T C A, 2016a; "Discrepancies are inherent part of expenditure side of GDP as of now", Business Standard, 2 June.

  • Anant, T C A, 2016b; "IIP has limitations as a representative of aggregate growth in manufacturing", The Hindu, 20 June.

  • Anant, T C A, 2016c; "Discrepancies in GDP Data", A reply to the EPW Editorial on the latest data on India’s GDP Series, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 30, 23July

  • Barman, R. B., 2016; "Rethinking Economics, Statistical System and Welfare: A Critique with India as a Case", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 28, 9 July.

  • Bhuyan, P., 2016; "Measurement of Central Bank Output Methodological Issues for India", RBI Working Paper Series WPS (DEPR): 06, 2016, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai.

  • Branchi, M., H C Dieden, W Haine, C Horvath, A Kanutin and L Kezbere, 2007; Analysis of Revisions to General Economic Statistics, Occasional Paper Series No. 74, October. European Central Bank, Frankfurt.

  • Carson,C S., S Khawaja, andTKMorrison, 2004; ‘Revisions Policy for Official Statistics: A Matter of Governance’, IMF Working Paper No. WP/04/87, May

  • Central Statistics Office, 1980; National Accounts Statistics: Sources and Methods, Department of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, New Delhi, April

  • Central Statistics Office, 2012; National Accounts Statistics Sources and Methods 2012, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi.

  • Central Statistics Office, 2014; National Accounts Statistics, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi.

  • Central Statistics Office, 2015; "No Room for Doubts on New GDPNumbers", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 16, 18 April.

  • Central Statistics Office, 2015a; Changes in Methodology and Data Sources in the New Series of National Accounts: Base Year 2011-12, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi, 26 June.

  • Central Statistics Office, 2016; "First Revised Estimates of National Income, Consumption Expenditure, Saving and Capital Formation 2014-15", Press Note, 29 January Central Statistics Office, 2016a; "Advance Estimates of National Income 2015-16 and Quarterly Estimates of Gross Domestic Product for the Third Quarter (Q3) 2015-16", Press Note, 8 February.

  • Central Statistics Office, 2016b; "Provisional Estimates of Annual National Income, 2015-16 and Quarterly Estimates of Gross Domestic Product for the Fourth Quarter (Q4) 2015-16", Press Note, 31 May.

  • Central Statistics Office, 2017; "First Advance Estimates of National Income 2016-17", Press Note, 6 January.

  • Dholakia, R. H., 2015; "Double Deflation Methodand Growth of Manufacturing A comment", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 41, 10 October.

  • EPW Research Foundation, 2015; "New Series of National Accounts: A Review", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 7, 14 February.

  • Expert Group on Non-sampling Errors, (MOSPI), 2005; Report on Cross-Validation Study of Estimates of Private Consumption Expenditure Available from Household Survey and National Accounts, Part - I, Savekeshana, Journal of National Sample Survey Organisation, 88th Issue, Vol.XXVNo. 4&Vol. XXVI, No. 1 October, New Delhi.

  • Goldar, B., 2015; "Growth in Gross Value Added of Indian Manufacturing 2011-12 series vs 2004-05 series", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 21, 23 May.

  • Government of India, 1982; Capital Formation and Saving in India 1950-51 to 1979-80, Report of the Working Group on Savings (Chairman: Prof. KN Raj), Reserve Bank of India, Bombay.

  • Goyal, A., 2015; "Measuring Indian Growth Why the data should be doubted less", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 32, 8 August.

  • Greenspan, A., 2000; "Remarks" in Bureau of Economic Analysis, at the Press Conference, January 2000 Survey of Current Business, "GDP: One of the Great Inventions of the 20th Century", at the http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/BEAWIDE/2000/0100od.pdf

  • Kumar, Sanjay and N.K. Sharma, 2007; "Divergence Between the Estimates of Consumption Expenditure in the National Accounts and the NSS:APerspective onNSS Data", The Journal of income and wealth, (www.iarniw.org), Vol. 29, No. 2, July-December.

  • Kuznets, S., 1951; "Government Product and National Income" in Erik Lundberg (Ed) (1951): Income and Wealth - Series I, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Bowes & Bowes, Cambridge.

  • Kuznets, S., 1959; Six Lectures on Economic Growth, The Free Press of Glencoe, New York.

  • Hexeberg, B., 2000; "Implementing the 1993 SNA:Backward Revision of National Accounts Data", SNA News and Notes, Number 11, May.

  • Hoven, L., 2008; "Using results from revisions analysis to improve compilation methods: a case study on revisions of Dutch estimates ofGDP volume growth", Contribution to the joint OECD/Eurostat Task Force on "Performing Revisions Analysis for Sub Annual Economic Statistics, May 30. Accessed at the https://www.oecd.org/std/40309550.pdf

  • McKenzie, R (undated); "OECD / Eurostat Guidelines on Revisions Policy and Analysis", Summary report of the OECD/Eurostat Task Force on "Performing Revisions Analysis for Sub-Annual Economic Statistics". Accessed at the http://www.oecd.org/std/40315564.pdf Mazumdar, S., 2015; "Manufacturing Growth in the New GDP Series", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 24, 13 June.

  • Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, (MOSPI), 2009; Report of the High Level Committee on Estimation of Saving and Investment (Chairman Dr. C. Rangarajan), Government of India, New Delhi.

  • Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, (MOSPI), 2015; "New Series Estimates of National Income, Consumption Expenditure, Saving and Capital Formation (Base year 2011-12)", Press Note dated 30 January.

  • Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, (MOSPI), 2015a; "Understanding the New Series of National Accounts: Frequently Asked Questions", Accessed from www.mospi.gov.in

  • Ministry of Corporate Affairs, 2014; 58th Annual Report on the Working & Administration of the Companies Act, 1956 Year ended March 31, 2014, Government of India, New Delhi.

  • Nagaraj, R., 2009; "Is Services Sector Output Over-estimated? An Inquiry", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 44, No. 5, 31 January.

  • Nagaraj, R., 2015; "Growth in GVA of Indian Manufacturing", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 24, 13 June.

  • Nagaraj, R., 2015a; "Size and Structure of India’s Private Corporate Sector: Implications for the New GDP Series", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 45, 7 November.

  • Nagaraj, R., 2016; "Unorganised Sector Output in the New GDP Series: Why Has It Shrunk?", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 14, 2 April

  • Nagaraj, R. and T. N. Srinivasan, 2016; "Measuring India’s GDP Growth: Unpacking the Analytics & Data Issues behind a Controversy that Refuses to Go Away", India Policy Forum 2016, National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi, 12-13 July.

  • National Statistical Commission, 2001; Report of the National Statistical Commission, (Chairman Dr. C. Rangarajan), Government of India, New Delhi, 5 September http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/css_12.html.

  • Rajakumar, J Dennis, 2003; "How Real Are Estimates of Corporate Investment?", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 38, No. 22, 31 May - 6 June.

  • Rajakumar, J Dennis, 2015; "Private Corporate Sector in New NAS Series Need for a Fresh Look", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 29, 18 July.

  • Rajakumar, J Dennis, 2016; "Estimates of High GDP growth in 2015-16 Not Entirely Convincing", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 26&27, 25 June.

  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2015; "Gross Value Added Why Not the Double Deflation Method for Estimation?", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 33, 15 August.

  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2016; "Some Puzzling Features of India’s RecentGDPNumbers", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 2, 9 January.

  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2016a; "Continuous Revisions Cast Doubts on GDP Advance Estimates", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 10, 5 March.

  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2016b; What makes the changes in the new NAS series so radical?, 16 November. Accessed at the http://www.ideasforindia.in/article.aspx ?article_id=1722

  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2017; ‘New National Accounts Series: An Exposition and Key Issues in the Debate’, in S Mahendra Dev (Ed.), India Development Report 2017, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), Mumbai.

  • Rajakumar, J Dennis, V B Sawant, and A Shetty, 2015; "New Estimates of Saving and Capital Formation: Larger Number in a Declining Trend", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 12, 21 March.

  • Rajeswari, T and Reena Singh, 2015; "Estimates of Savings of Quasi Corporates", The Journal of income and wealth (www.iarniw.org), Vol. 37, No. 2, July-December.

  • Rao, S K G K, 2015; "Mystery of Private Corporate Sector Saving", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 22, 30 May.

  • Sen, P., 2015; "The three unanswered questions in GDP data" Interview in Live Mint, 2 September.

  • Shetty, S. L., 2015; "Factor Cost Basis ofGDPis Fundamental for Measuring Real Growth and Not GDP at Market Prices",A paper presented at the 34th Annual Conference of the Indian Association for Research in National Income and Wealth held during November 20-21, 2015 at IGIDR, Mumbai.

  • Shyam, Radhey and Abhiman Das, 2005; "Central Banks Output in GDP: Issues and Measurement", The Journal of income and wealth (www.iarniw.org), Vol. 27, Nos. 1 & 2, January-December.

  • Sinharay, A, A Kumar and T C A Anant, 2015; "Decoding the GVA growth rate", Business Standard, 29 July.

  • Subbarao, D., 2016; Who Moved My Interest Rate?: Leading the Reserve Bank of India Through Five Turbulent Years, Penguin Books, Gurgaon

  • United Nations, 1968; A System of National Accounts 1968, Studies in Methods, Series FNo. 2, Rev. 3, United Nations United Nations, 1993; A System of National Accounts 1993, United Nations

  • United Nations, 2008; A System of National Accounts 2008, United Nations


Abstract Views: 298

PDF Views: 4




  • National Accounts Series:A Review and Highlights of Crucial Issues for Debate

Abstract Views: 298  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

S. L. Shetty
EPW Research Foundation, Mumbai, India
J. Dennis Rajakumar
EPW Research Foundation, Mumbai, India

Abstract


The latest re-basing of India’s National Accounts series from 2004-05 to 2011-12 has been one of the most radical changes introduced ever in the adoption of new data sources as well as in the application of new concepts based on international guidelines for the revisions in the methodology of their compilation. These changes have aroused unusual misgivings and considerable debate amongst the academic circles and in the media. This paper seeks to provide an exposition of the rationale for the changes introduced so that there is better appreciation of the same, and at the same time, attempt some critical evaluation of the revisions made so that we could offer constructive suggestions for improving the overall results including, wherever necessary, the quality of estimates.

References