![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_open_medium.gif)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_restricted_medium.gif)
Response to Ashima Goyal
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Ashima Goyal (AG for short) has raised a number of critical issues in reference tomy paper. Of these, I have focused on the following which I believe to be of special relevance.
AG: First, while new classical macroeconomics, with its belief in perfect market clearing, could certainly be said to have subscribed tothe efficient markets hypothesis (EMH), the neo-Keynesian view emphasised imperfections in markets, including financial markets (p.403).
AG: First, while new classical macroeconomics, with its belief in perfect market clearing, could certainly be said to have subscribed tothe efficient markets hypothesis (EMH), the neo-Keynesian view emphasised imperfections in markets, including financial markets (p.403).
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 185
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 1