Journal of Indian School of Political Economy

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Examination of Determinants of India’s Intra-Industry Trade


Affiliations
1 International Economics, Department of Economics (Autonomous), University of Mumbai, Mumbai-400 098, India
2 Department of Economics (Autonomous), University of Mumbai, Mumbai 400 098, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Following the economic liberalisation that took place in the early 1990s in India, the share of intra-industry trade (IIT) in total trade has increased significantly. Various factors such as the rise in Per Capita Income (PCI), Gross Domestic Product (GDP), product differentiation, ease of entry for foreign firms and reduction in trade barriers have been found to be the major determinants of IIT. These determinants of IIT have varied from country to country. However, there is an issue of whether a country’s IIT is dominated by vertical IIT (VIIT) or horizontal IIT (HIIT). Various methodologies have been developed to examine this segregation. The present paperattempts to modify the existing methodologies related to segregation of IIT by attempting to identify the determinants of India’s IIT during the period of 1990-91 to 2015-16. The trends in IIT show that India’s IIT is dominated by VIIT though the HIIT is increasing at a higher rate over the period from 1990-91 to 2015-16. This study applies the Toda and Yamamoto method and also uses the modified Granger causality test to identify the causal relationship between IIT and its determinants. A unidirectional causality is observed from GDP, trade openness and PCI to IIT while unidirectional causality is found from EP and trade openness to HIIT.

Keywords

IIT, Granger Causality, VIIT, HIIT JEL Codes: F140.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abd-el-Rahman, Kamal, 1991; Firms, competitive and national comparative advantages as joint determinants of trade competition, WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv, Vol. 127, No. 1.

  • Ando, Mitsuyo, 2006; Fragmentation and Vertical IntraIndustry Trade in East Asia, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 17 No. 3.

  • Aturupane, Chonira, Simeon Djankov and Bernard Hoekman, 1999; Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade between Eastern Europe and the European Union, WeltwirtschafilichesArchiv, Vol. 135,No. 1.

  • Azhar, Abdul K. M., Elliott R. and Liu Junting, 2008; On the measurement of product quality in intra-industry trade: an empirical test for China, China Economic Review, Vol. 19 No. 2.

  • Azhar, Abdul K. M. and Elliott R., 2006; On the measurement of product quality in intra-industry trade, Review of World Economics, Vol. 142, No. 3.

  • Balassa, Bela, 1986; Intra-industry specialisation: a crosscountry analysis, European Economic Review, Vol. 30.

  • Bergstrand, Jeffrey. H., 1990; The Heckscher-OhlinSamuelson Model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade, Economic Journal, Vol. 100 No. 403.

  • Bhat, T. P., 2011; ‘Structural Changes in India’s Foreign Trade’, A Study Prepared for Research Programme, Structural Changes, Industry and Employment in the Indian Economy, Macro-economic Implications of Emerging Pattern, Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi.

  • Bhattacharyya, Ranajoy, 2005; Economic Development and Intra-Industry Trade in the Republic of Korea, Journal of Economic Integration, Vol. 20, No. 4.

  • Burange, L. G., Pooja Thakur and Hemangi K. Kelkar, 2015; ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Intra-Industry Trade in India’s Manufacturing Sector: A Causal Relationship’, ISFIRE Working Paper Series, WP-8, March.

  • Burange, L.G. and Sheetal J. Chaddha, 2007; ‘Growth in India’s Intra-Industry Trade’, Journal of Indian School of Political Economy, Vol. 19, Nos. 1 and 2.

  • Cabral Manuel, Rod Falvey and Chris Milner, 2013; Endowment differences and the composition of intraindustry trade, Review of International Economics, Vol. 21, No. 3.

  • Caves, Richard E., 1981; Intra-industry trade and market structure in the industrial countries, Oxford Journals, Vol. 33, No. 2.

  • Das, Gouranga Gopal, 2005; Growth and pattern of intraindustry trade in manufactures in India’s overall trade: A quantitative analysis, Indian Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 4, No. 1.

  • Dickey, David, A and Wayne A. Fuller, 1979; Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit ischolar_main, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 74, No. 366.

  • Dixit, Avinash K. and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1977; Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, The American Economic Review, Vol. 67, No. 3.

  • Durkin John T. and Markus Krygier, 2000; Differences in GDP per Capita and the share of intra-industry trade: The role of vertically differentiated trade, Review of International Economics, Vol. 8, No. 4.

  • Ekanayake, E. M., 2001; Determinants of intra-industry trade: The case of Mexico, The International Trade Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1.

  • Enders, Walter, 2004; Applied Econometric Time Series, Second Edition, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley and Sons (Asia) Pvt. Ltd.

  • Falvey, Rodney E., 1981; Commercial policies and intraindustry trade, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 11, No. 4.

  • Fontagné, Lionel and Michael Freudenberg, 1997; Intraindustry Trade: Methodological Issues Reconsidered’ CEPII Working Paper 97-01, Centre d’Etudes Prospectivesetd’ Informations Internationales, Paris.

  • Granger C.W., 1969; Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods, Econometrica, Vol. 37, No. 3.

  • Greenaway, David, Robert Hine and Chris Milner, 1994; Country specific factors and pattern of horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in the UK. WelwirtschaftlichesArchiv, Vol. 130, No. 1.

  • Greenaway, David and Chris Milner, 1984; A cross section analysis of intra-industry trade in the U.K. European Economic Review, Vol. 25, No. 3.

  • Grubel, H. G. and P. J. Lloyd, 1975; Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products, London: Macmillan Press.

  • Gujarati, Damodar, 2004; Basic Econometrics, Fourth Edition, The McGraw-Hill

  • Helpman, E., 1987; Imperfect competition and international trade: evidencefrom fourteen industrial countries, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1.

  • Helpman, E. and P. R. Krugman, 1985; Market Structure and Foreign Trade- Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the International Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Hughes, K., 1993; Intra-industry trade in the 1980s: A panel study. WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv, Vol. 129, No. 3.

  • Hummels, David and James Levinsohn, 1995; Monopolistic competition and international trade: reconsidering the evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 3.

  • Kelkar,Hemangi and L.G. Burange, 2016; India’s vertical and horizontal intra industry trade during post-liberalisation period, Trade, Investment and Economic Development in Asia: Empirical and Policy Issues, Edited by Debashis Chakraborty and Jaydeep Mukherjee, Routledge Studies in Development Economics, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, Abingdon, UK.

  • Kinnerup, Kristina, 2005; Country-specific determinants of intra-industry trade: A case for France. Student publication for Master’s degree, Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, LUND

  • University, Sweden.

  • Krugman, Paul, 1981; Intra-industry specialisation and the gains from trade, Journal of political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 5.

  • Lancaster, Kelvin, 1980; Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 10, 2.

  • Markusen, James. R., 1997; Trade versus investment liberalisation, Working Paper, No. 6231, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Reserve Bank of India, 2016; Handbook of Statistics on the Indian Economy, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai, India.

  • Shaked, Anver and John Sutton, 1983; Natural oligopolies, Econometrica, Vol. 51, No. 5.

  • Toda, Hiro.Y. and Taku Yamamoto, 1995; Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 66, Nos. 1-2.

  • Toh, Kiertisak, 1982; A cross-section analysis of intraindustry trade in U.S. manufacturing industries, WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv, Vol. 118, No. 2.

  • Veeramani, Choorikkad, 2002; India’s intra-industry trade under economic liberalisation: trends and country specific factors, WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv, Vol. 138, No. 3.

  • Veeramani, Choorikkad, 2004; Growing intra-industry trade in manufacturing: implications for policy, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 39, No. 41.

  • Veeramani, Choorikkad, 2007; Industry-specific determinants of intra-industry trade in India, Indian Economic Review, Vol. 42, No. 2.

  • World Bank, 2016; World Data Bank: World Development Indicators, The World Bank. Retrieved on October 18, 2016 fromhttp://databank.worldbank.org/data/databases.aspx


Abstract Views: 363

PDF Views: 0




  • An Examination of Determinants of India’s Intra-Industry Trade

Abstract Views: 363  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

L. G. Burange
International Economics, Department of Economics (Autonomous), University of Mumbai, Mumbai-400 098, India
Hemangi K. Kelkar
Department of Economics (Autonomous), University of Mumbai, Mumbai 400 098, India

Abstract


Following the economic liberalisation that took place in the early 1990s in India, the share of intra-industry trade (IIT) in total trade has increased significantly. Various factors such as the rise in Per Capita Income (PCI), Gross Domestic Product (GDP), product differentiation, ease of entry for foreign firms and reduction in trade barriers have been found to be the major determinants of IIT. These determinants of IIT have varied from country to country. However, there is an issue of whether a country’s IIT is dominated by vertical IIT (VIIT) or horizontal IIT (HIIT). Various methodologies have been developed to examine this segregation. The present paperattempts to modify the existing methodologies related to segregation of IIT by attempting to identify the determinants of India’s IIT during the period of 1990-91 to 2015-16. The trends in IIT show that India’s IIT is dominated by VIIT though the HIIT is increasing at a higher rate over the period from 1990-91 to 2015-16. This study applies the Toda and Yamamoto method and also uses the modified Granger causality test to identify the causal relationship between IIT and its determinants. A unidirectional causality is observed from GDP, trade openness and PCI to IIT while unidirectional causality is found from EP and trade openness to HIIT.

Keywords


IIT, Granger Causality, VIIT, HIIT JEL Codes: F140.

References