Journal of Indian School of Political Economy

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Understanding the Experience and Impact of Demonetisation-2016 in Rural Areas:A Study of Six Villages in Western India


Affiliations
1 Center for Development Alternatives, Ahmedabad& Former Professor and Director, Gujarat Institute of Development Research, Ahmedabad, India
2 Pune based Independent Researcher, India
3 Ahmedabad based Independent Researcher, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Demonetisation-2016 has attracted significant attention to a large number of diverse opinions on its socio-economic impact in India. However, rural India did not get due attention in the discourse. This paper attempts to understand the impact on and response of the rural poor to the Demonetisation-2016. Surprisingly, they do not seem to have been affected much ‘adversely’, as was anticipated. This is possibly because rural poor have had ‘nothing much to lose’. Rather, they seem to have positive expectations to move forward. Finding political solutions to the problems confronting them such as rising demand for farmers’ loan-waivers seems to be a part of this on-going process.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Dasgupta, D., 2016; "Theoretical Analysis of ‘Demonetisation’," Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 52, No. 51, 17 December.

  • Gautam, P., et. al., 2017; Demonetisation, 2017, "Wefts and Warps of the Common Man", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 52, No. 47, 25th November.

  • Guerin, I., et. al., 2017; "Insights on Demonetisation from Rural Tamil Nadu: Understanding Social Networks and Social Protection", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 52, No. 52, 30 December.

  • Jaykumar, T., 2017; Behavioural Economics Perspective of ‘Demonetisation’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. No. 41, October, 14.

  • Kholi, V. and Ramkumar, 2016; ‘Economic Rationale of Demonetisation - 2016’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 53, 31 December

  • Krishnan, D. and Siegel, S., 2017; "Survey of the Effects of Demonetisation on 28 Slum Neighbourhoods in Mumbai", Vol. 52, Issue No. 3, 21 January.

  • Kumar, Arun, 2017; "Economic Consequences of Demonetisation Money Supply and Economic Structure", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 52, No. 1, 7 January.

  • Mankar, R. and S. Shekhar, 2017; "Demonetisation and the Delusion of GDP Growth", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 52, No. 18, 6 May.

  • Patel, I. G., 2002; Glimpses of Indian Economic Policy: An Insider’s View, Delhi, Oxford University Press.

  • Patnaik, P., 2016; "Demonetisation: Witless and AntiPeople", in The Citizen, November Retrieved 28th April 2018.

  • Rajakumar, J. D. and S. L. Shetty, 2016; "Demonetisation: 1978, the Present and the Aftermath," Economic & Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No 48, December 30.

  • Rajya Sabha Secretariat, 2016; "Debates in Rajya Sabha", Parliament of India, November 24.

  • Scott C. J., 1985; Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, New Haven, Yale University Press.

  • Sood, A. et. al., 2017; "The New Moral Economy Demonetisation, Digitalisation and India’s Core Economic Problems", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 52, No. 1, 7 January.


Abstract Views: 389

PDF Views: 1




  • Understanding the Experience and Impact of Demonetisation-2016 in Rural Areas:A Study of Six Villages in Western India

Abstract Views: 389  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Amita Shah
Center for Development Alternatives, Ahmedabad& Former Professor and Director, Gujarat Institute of Development Research, Ahmedabad, India
Samuel Abraham
Pune based Independent Researcher, India
Deepak Nandani
Ahmedabad based Independent Researcher, India

Abstract


Demonetisation-2016 has attracted significant attention to a large number of diverse opinions on its socio-economic impact in India. However, rural India did not get due attention in the discourse. This paper attempts to understand the impact on and response of the rural poor to the Demonetisation-2016. Surprisingly, they do not seem to have been affected much ‘adversely’, as was anticipated. This is possibly because rural poor have had ‘nothing much to lose’. Rather, they seem to have positive expectations to move forward. Finding political solutions to the problems confronting them such as rising demand for farmers’ loan-waivers seems to be a part of this on-going process.

References