Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Financing for a Sustainable Future:Analysing the Role of Multilateral Development Banks in an Evolutionary Environmental Law Regime


     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper attempts to outline the role of MDBs (Multi-lateral Development Banks) in supporting developmental funding activities within an evolutionary environmental law regime. Since the World Bank is seen to have a sustained presence in climate-related finance, its role has been analysed through its principal of funding, climate funds. In this context, our objective in the study was to address three main issues: first, MDBs role in integrating environmental considerations into multilateral funding activities with particular reference to the World Bank’s functions; second, the treatment of environment protection standards under MDBs’ development lending process and under climate-related funds; and third, examining the scope of independent complaints mechanisms with the help of some brief case studies (two of them of). In other words, the objective of the analysis was to draw insights from the experience of MDBs, more specifically, the World Bank, to serve as useful lessons for the climate finance regime in future.

Keywords

Multi-Lateral Development Banks, Environmental Law Regime, Climate Related Finance, Environment Protection Standards, Independent Complaints Mechanism.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • ADB, 2016; "Improving Lives through the Accountability Mechanism", ADB Accountability Mechanism Annual Report 2016, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.
  • Bekhechi, M.A., 1999; ‘Some Observations Regarding Environmental Covenants and Conditionalities in World Bank Lending Activities’, Max Planck United Nations Year Book, Vol. 3,
  • Beyerlin, U. and T. Marauhn, 2011; International Environmental Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford, UK.
  • Birnie, P., et.al. 2009; InternationalLawand the Environment, 3rd edition, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bodansky, D. and E. Diringer, 2010; ‘The Evolution of Multilateral Regimes: Implications for Climate Change’, Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
  • Bowen, R., 2010; ‘Walking the Talk: The Effectiveness of Environmental Commitments Made by Multilateral Development Banks’, the Georgetown International Environment Law Review, Vol. 22.
  • Bowles, I. et al., 1999; ‘The Environmental Impacts of International Finance Corporation Lending and Proposals for Reform: A Case Study of Conservation and Oil Development in The Guatemalan Pettn’, Environmental Law, Vol. 29.
  • Bradlow, D.D. and M.S. Chapman, 2011; ‘Public Participation and the Private Sector: The Role of Multilateral Development Banks in the Evolution of International Legal Standards’, Erasmus Law. Review, Vol. 4.
  • Bretton Woods Project, 2011; ‘What the Green Climate Fund can learn from the Climate Investment Funds’, Bretton Woods Project Publication, June, Bretton Woods Project, London.
  • CIEL, 2011; Report on ‘A complaint mechanism for REDD+’ Center for International Environmental Law and Rainforest Foundation Norway.
  • CIF, 2011; Governance Framework for the Clean Technology Fund (CTF).
  • Dannenmaier, E., 2011; ‘The Role of Non-State Actors in Climate Compliance’ in Brunnée, J, et. al., (eds.), Promoting Compliance in an Evolving Climate Regime, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Dooley, K. et. al., 2008; Cutting Corners: World Bank’s forest and carbon fund fails forests and peoples, FERN/Forest Peoples Programme Report, Moreton in Marsh, UK.
  • Echeverri, G.L. and B. MÜller, 2009; ‘The Financial Mechanism of the UNFCCC: A Brief History’, European Capacity Building Initiative Policy Brief, European Capacity Building Initiative, Oxford, UK.
  • Echeverri, G.L., 2009; ‘Developing Countries and a Proposal for Architecture and Governance of a ReformedUNFCCC Financial Mechanism’, in Stewart, R.B. et. al. (eds.) Climate Finance Regulatory and Funding Strategies for Climate Change and Global Development (New York, New York University Press.
  • Gadde, H. et.al., 2011; ‘Promoting Energy Access Projects under the Clean Development Mechanism Standardised Baselines and Suppressed Demand’, World Bank, Washington DC.
  • GEF, 2011; Instrument for the Establishment of the Restructured Global Environmental Facility, Global Environment Facility, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
  • GCF, 2014; Guiding Framework and Procedures for Accrediting National, Regional and International Implementing Entities and Intermediaries, Including the Fund’s.
  • Fiduciary.Principles.and.Standards.and Environmental and Social Safeguards GCF/B.07/02 7, Meeting of the Board, May, Songdo, Republic of Korea.
  • Greene, W., 2004; ‘Aid Fragmentation and Proliferation: Can Donors Improve the Delivery of Climate Finance?’ IDS Bulletin, Vol. 35, No. 3.
  • Gualtieri, A. G., 2002; ‘The Environmental Accountability of the World Bank to Non-State Actors: Insights from the Inspection Panel’, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 73, No. 1.
  • Head, J. W., 1991; ‘Environmental Conditionality in the Operations of International Development Finance Institutions’, The Kansas Journal of Law&Public Policy, Vol. 15.
  • Haroldo, M., 2011; ‘Financial Mechanisms under the Climate Regime in Brunnée, J. et.al. (ed.), Promoting Compliance in an Evolving Climate Regime, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • "The Bank is the preferred trustee candidate for developed country parties, but it is seen by many developing countries as an institution that represents the interests of wealthy countries."
  • Herbert, M., 1996; ‘The Bretton Woods, Institutions: Coping with Crises’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, Vol. 90.
  • ICJ, 1949; Reparations for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, International Court of Justice, Representation No. 174, International Court of Justice, The Hague.
  • I.C.J., 1997; Case concerning Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia), Reports of the International Court of Justice, The Hague.
  • IFC, 2012a; Sustainability Framework Policy and Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability (‘IFC Sustainability Policy’), International Finance Corporation, Washington D.C.
  • IFC, 2012b; Access to Information Policy, Washington D.C. International Finance Corporation, Washington D.C.
  • ILC, 2011; Article 2 (a) of ILC Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organisations, 63rd Session, International Law Commission, United Nations, Geneva.
  • Lattanzio, R.K., 2010; ‘Climate Investment Funds (CIFs): An Overview’, Congressional Research Service (CRS) for Congress, US Congress, Washington D.C.
  • Moncel, R and H. Asselt, 2012; ‘All Hands on Deck! Mobilising Climate Change Action beyond the UNFCCC’, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, Vol. 21, No. 3.
  • Morgan, J., 2011; ‘The Emerging Post-Cancun Climate Regime’ in Jutta, J. Doelle, B. And Rajamani, L., Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Nanwani,S., 2008; ‘Holding MultilateralDevelopment Banks to Account: Gateways and Barriers’, International Commercial Law Review, Vol. 10.
  • OECD, 2005; The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
  • Passoni, C. et.al., 2017; ‘Empowering the Inspection Panel: The Impact of the World Bank’s New Environmental and Social Safeguards’, International Law and Politics, Vol. 49.
  • Sands, P. and P. Galizzi, 2004; ‘Documents in International Environmental Law’ Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Sands, P. and J. Peel, 2012; Principles of International Environmental Law, 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
  • Sanae, F., 2013; ‘The World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Human Rights: Developing Standards of Transparency, Participation and Accountability’, Edward Elgar, Massachussetts, USA.
  • Schalatek L. et. al., 2012; ‘The Green Climate Fund^R ODI Brief 11, Overseas Development Institute, London, U.K.
  • Seetha, S., 2014; ‘Financing for a Sustainable Future: Analysing the Role of Multilateral Development Banks in an Evolutionary Environmental Law Regime’, Unpublished L.L.M. Thesis, Queen Mary University, London, U.K.
  • Shih, W., 2000; ‘The World Bank and Climate Change’, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 2, No. 4.
  • Shihata, I., 1992; ‘The World Bank and the Environment: A Legal Perspective, Maryland, Journal of International Law, Vo. 1.
  • Steer,Aand J.Mason, 1995; ‘The Role of Multilateral Finance and the Environment: A View from the World Bank, Indiana, Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1.
  • Suzuki, E. and S. Nanwani, 2005; ‘Responsibility of International Organisations: The Accountability Mechanisms of Multilateral Development Banks’, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 27, No. 2.
  • Tan, C., 2008; ‘No Additionality, New Conditionality: A Critique of the World Bank’s Climate Investment Funds’ Third World Network’, Briefing Paper 2, Climate Change Subsidiary Bodies’ Sessions, Bonn, June.
  • UNCED, 1992; ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, UN Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (vol. I)/31 ILM 874 (1992), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, June.
  • UNECE, 1999; "Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision- Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters", Convention adopted by the Fourth Ministerial Conference of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • United Nations, 1987; ‘Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future’, Transmitted to the General Assembly, United Nations as an Annex to document No. A/42/427, United Nations, New York.
  • United Nations, 1992; ‘Programme of Action for Sustainable Development’, United Nations, General Assembly Official Records, 46th Sess., Agenda Item 21, United Nations Doc A/Conf.151/26, United Nations, New York.
  • United Nations, 2012; Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, June.
  • UNFCCC, 2010; The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention, COP 16 Decision 1/CP.16 UN Doc FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1, United Nations Framework on Climatic Change Conference of Parties (UNFCCC- COP), Cancun, Mexico.
  • UNFCCC, 2011; Launching the Green Climate Fund, COP 17, Decision 3/CP.17, UN Doc. FCCC/CP//9/Add.1., United Nations Framework on Climatic Change Conference of Parties (UNFCCC- COP) Durban.
  • UNFCC, 2012; COP 18, Decision 7/CP.18 9th plenary meeting, December, Doha, Qatar.
  • UNFCC, 2013a; Report of the fourth meeting of the Standing Committee on Finance, Bonn, Germany, UNFCCC SCF/2013/3/11, June.
  • UNFCC, 2013b; ‘Arrangements between the Conference of theParties and the GreenClimate Fund’, Decision 5/CP.19 presented in the UNFCCC document FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 Report of the COP19 held in Warsaw, November.
  • UNFCC, 2014; ‘Agenda item 1: Terms of Reference of the Independent Evaluation Unit, the Independent Integrity Unit, and the Independent Redress Mechanism’, Meeting of the Board, February, Bali, Indonesia.
  • Werksman, J., 2003; ‘Consolidating Global Environmental Governance: New Lessons from the GEF? Global Environmental Governance: The Post-Johannesburg Agenda’, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.
  • World Bank, 1995; Project Investigation Report, Arun III Hydroelectric Project, Nepal, World Bank, Washington D.C.
  • World Bank, 1996; The World Bank’s Environment Department Handbook (also known as ‘World Bank EA Sourcebook’) - ‘International Agreements on Environment and Natural Resources: Relevance and Application in Environmental Assessment’, March 1996, Number 10, Environment Department of the World Bank.
  • World Bank, 1999a; Manual on Operational Policies on Environmental Assessment, OP No. 4.1, (revised 2013).
  • World Bank, 1999b; Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook 1998, World Bank, Washington D.C.
  • World Bank, 2007; The Brazil: Parana Biodiversity Project, Final Eligibility Report and Recommendation by the World Bank Inspection Panel, Report No.38800 March 1, World Bank, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
  • World Bank, 2011a; The Inspection Panel, Report No. 58011 -LR, LIBERIA: Development Forestry Sector Management Project (Trust Funds Nos. TF057090 -LR; TF096154 -LR; and, TF096170 -LR), World Bank, Washington D.C.
  • World Bank, 2011b; The Inspection Panel, Report No. 63640-CL, CHILE: Quilleco Hydropower Project (Trust Fund No. TF056272-CL) Final Report and Recommendation.
  • World Bank, 2013; The World Bank Policy on Access to Information, World Bank. Washington D.C.
  • World Bank, 2016; Environmental and social Framework: Setting Environmental and Social Standards for Project Financing, World Bank, Washington D.C.

Abstract Views: 304

PDF Views: 0




  • Financing for a Sustainable Future:Analysing the Role of Multilateral Development Banks in an Evolutionary Environmental Law Regime

Abstract Views: 304  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Abstract


This paper attempts to outline the role of MDBs (Multi-lateral Development Banks) in supporting developmental funding activities within an evolutionary environmental law regime. Since the World Bank is seen to have a sustained presence in climate-related finance, its role has been analysed through its principal of funding, climate funds. In this context, our objective in the study was to address three main issues: first, MDBs role in integrating environmental considerations into multilateral funding activities with particular reference to the World Bank’s functions; second, the treatment of environment protection standards under MDBs’ development lending process and under climate-related funds; and third, examining the scope of independent complaints mechanisms with the help of some brief case studies (two of them of). In other words, the objective of the analysis was to draw insights from the experience of MDBs, more specifically, the World Bank, to serve as useful lessons for the climate finance regime in future.

Keywords


Multi-Lateral Development Banks, Environmental Law Regime, Climate Related Finance, Environment Protection Standards, Independent Complaints Mechanism.

References