Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Artificial Inventors: A Shift in Traditional Policy Paradigm


Affiliations
1 Department of Commerce and Management, St Xavier University, Kolkata — 700 160, West Bengal,, India

There has been a constant resonance on the legality of mentioning artificial computing entity as an inventor the world over. There have been various instances of judicial decisions with an elaborate commentary on the legality of a robot or AI becoming the inventor of a patent. Considering the legal implications of AI being the inventors of inventions through identifying gaps by analysing tonnes of information through various big data analysing means, a new policy framework is necessitated. However, the big question that arises is, should the development of such inventions and their consequent patenting should be disallowed as the recent judgments have been made, or should there be regulations on inventorship of such patents and their resulting ownership. The present article attempts to give a prognosis for adapting a new legal viewpoint for considering the AI as an inventor rather than just rejecting them.
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 149




  • Artificial Inventors: A Shift in Traditional Policy Paradigm

Abstract Views: 149  | 

Authors

Soumya Prakash Patra
Department of Commerce and Management, St Xavier University, Kolkata — 700 160, West Bengal,, India

Abstract


There has been a constant resonance on the legality of mentioning artificial computing entity as an inventor the world over. There have been various instances of judicial decisions with an elaborate commentary on the legality of a robot or AI becoming the inventor of a patent. Considering the legal implications of AI being the inventors of inventions through identifying gaps by analysing tonnes of information through various big data analysing means, a new policy framework is necessitated. However, the big question that arises is, should the development of such inventions and their consequent patenting should be disallowed as the recent judgments have been made, or should there be regulations on inventorship of such patents and their resulting ownership. The present article attempts to give a prognosis for adapting a new legal viewpoint for considering the AI as an inventor rather than just rejecting them.