Open Access
Subscription Access
IP Policy Framework- A Tool for IP Policy Development
Innovation and scientific developments are the bases for economic growth. Academic and research organizations are key contributors to this development. These are the intellectual capital hubs rich in innovation capital. Innovation capital is responsible for inventions and innovations that can be protected by using the legal instrument to create intellectual property (IP). These IP rights creation and management is smooth if there is an organisational IP Policy which will address various IP-related issues. Hence, careful drafting of IP Policy is an indispensable activity of an organization. However, this is usually ignored by academic and research organisations in developing nations may be due to unawareness about its importance and unavailability of IP experts for drafting IP Policy. There are various earlier efforts to push these organisations to develop their own IP Policy including IP Policy guidelines developed by Government bodies. However, in spite of these efforts, IP Policy is not created by most of the academic and research organisations in the country till date. After examining the reasons for the non development of IP Policy, a new “IP Policy Framework” is proposed to overcome these problems. The IP policies have been analysed through exploratory research methodology for various organizations in the India and across various organisations from developed nations.
Keywords
Intellectual Property, IP Policy, India, Research, Developing country, Academic and Research Institutes.
User
Font Size
Information
- Țîțu M A, Oprean C, Stan S & Țîțu Ștefan, The Place and Role of Intellectual Property Policies in an Advanced Scientific Research and Education University, International Conference on Knowledge-Based Organisations, 23 (2017) 479.
- Cervantes M & Division T P, Academic Patenting : How universities and public research organizations are using their intellectual property to boost research and spur innovative Institutional ownership of IP is not sufficient Building critical mass in IP management, WIPO Doc, 2016, 2.
- Gargate G & Momaya K S, Intellectual property management system: Develop and self-assess using IPM model, World Patent Information, 52 (2018) 29.
- Saha P & Kaushik S, How effective are India’s model guidelineson implementation of IPR policy for academic institutions? Seeking the answer from the US and the UK experience, Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2021.
- National Intellectual Property Rights Policy, https://dipp.gov.in/policies-rules-and-acts/policies/nationalipr- policy, 2016.
- Basheer S & Agarwal P, India’s New IP Policy : A Bare Act ? Indian J. Law Technol, 13 (2017) 1.
- Gupta V, Protecting India’s Traditional Knowledge, World Intellectual Property Organisation, 2011, 1.
- Traditional Knowledge Digital Library, http://www.tkdl.res.in/tkdl/langdefault/common/Home.asp?G L=Eng.
- CIPAM-DPIIT, Model Guidelines on Implementation of IPR Policy, (2019) 1–23.
- Kowalski S & Krattiger A, Making the most of intellectual property: Developing an institutional IP policy, IP Handbook, 2007.
- Anselin L, Varga A & Acs Z, Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations, J Urban Econ, 42 (1997) 422.
- Mendes P, To What Extent are University IP Policies Legally Binding? SSRN Electronic Journal, 21–26 (2017), doi:10.2139/ssrn.2822343.
- Gargate G & Jain K, Role of IP Policy in innovation and entrepreneurship development : Case study of HEI in India, Udyog Pragati-The NITIE, 2013.
- Commission P, Thakur A & Secretary M, Press Information Bureau Government of India Ministry of Human Resource Development, (2012) 3–5.
- Institutions of National Importance, https://mhrd.gov.in/ institutions-national-importance, 2019.
Abstract Views: 258
PDF Views: 126