Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Significance and Factors Hampering Patents Commercialization in India


Affiliations
1 DST-Centre for Policy Research, Panjab University, Chandigarh — 160 014,, India
 

As per the Patents Act, 1970 one of the patentability criteria is ‘the invention should have industrial application’. The patents’ rights conferred to the patentee are merely not to enjoy the monopoly over the invention, but the patentee has to ensure the use of technology for the societal and economic benefit of the country. Once the patent is granted, the patentee has to ensure the working of the patent in India on a commercial scale. In return, the patentee gets his due amount for his hard work and efforts rendered for the intellectual creativity. Current paper focuses on the working/non-working profile of the patents granted to Indian Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) and National Research Labs (NRLs) in the country from January 2010 to December 2017. The data has been procured from the prescribed ‘Form-27’ by the Indian Patent Office, which the patentee is required to file every year before the end of financial year, post grant of the patent. The research depicts in how many patentees submitted requisite ‘Form-27’, and in how many cases patents granted, worked or didn’t work. Moreover, various reasons cited for the non-working of the patents have also been identified. The issues being encountered with by the patentees have been identified and measures thereof required to be taken, at the individual level, institutional level and government level, have also been suggested.

Keywords

Form-27, Working/Non-Working Patents, Licensing, Compulsory Licensing.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Tewari R & Bhardwaj M, Mapping Patents and Research Publications of Higher Education Institutes and National R&D Laboratories of India, (Panjab University, Chandigarh) 2018, http://cpr.puchd.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Book-2- PDF-min.pdf.
  • Bhardwaj M & Sandhu A, Working/non-working status of patents granted to HEIs and NRLs in India, Current Science, 120 (1) (2021) 34.
  • Bhardwaj M, Sandhu A & Ghumman N, Patents commercialization profile of Universities and Higher Education Institutes in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (2021) 199.
  • The Patents Act, 1970, http://www.ipindia.nic.in/ writereaddata/Portal/IPOAct/1_31_1_patent-act-1970-11 march 2015.pdf.
  • Indian Patent Advanced Serach System, http://ipindiaservices. gov.in/publicsearch/.
  • European Union, The European IPR Helpdesk: Your Guide to IP Commercialisation, (2016), https://www.iprhelpdesk.eu/sites/ default/files/documents/EU-IPR-Guide-Commercialisation.pdf.
  • Singhai A & Singhai M, A study of Natco v Bayer case : Its effect and current situation, MIT International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2 (2) (2016) 21, ISSN 2394-5338 (Print); 2394-5346.
  • Fees Payable, Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (CGPDTM), http://www.ipindia.nic.in/ writereaddata/Portal/IPOFormUpload/1_11_1/Fees.pdf.
  • Gandhi M M, Industry-academia collaboration in India: Recent initiatives, issues, challenges, opportunities and strategies, Business and Management Review, 5 (2) (2014).
  • Kamariah Ismail WZWO and IAM, The commercialisation process of patents by universities, African J Bus Manag, 5 (17) (2011) 7198, doi:10.5897/AJBM09.255.
  • Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, https://rnd.iitb.ac.in/ news/iit-bombay-won-national-intellectual-property-award-2019.
  • Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR), E-Book, http://www.dsir.gov.in/files/e-book/mobile/index. html#p=1.
  • NCL Innovations, http://www.nclinnovations.org/pace.php.
  • Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC), Promoting Academic Research Conversion to Enterprise (PACE), https://birac.nic.in/desc_new.php?id=286.
  • Isabelle D A, S & T commercialization strategies and practices North American strategies and practices of laboratories and universities, (Chapter-4) (2007) :1-37, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847205551.00011.
  • WIPO, Institutional IP Policy, https://www.wipo.int/edocs/ mdocs/aspac/en/wipo_ip_osa_17/wipo_ip_osa_17_t7.pdf. Published 2017.
  • CIPAM, Model Guidelines on Implementation of IPR Policy for Academic Institutions, https://dipp.gov.in/sites/default/ files/Draft_Model_Guidelines_on_Implementation_of_IPR_Poli cy_for_Academic_Institutions_09092019.pdf.
  • Technology Information, Forecasting and Assessment Council (TIFAC), Patent Facilitation Centre – PFC, https://tifac.org.in/ index.php/admin-finance/patent.
  • Basheer S & Kochupillai M, The ‘Compulsory Licence’ Regime in India: Past, Present and Future, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012; (January 2018), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1685129.

Abstract Views: 120

PDF Views: 93




  • Significance and Factors Hampering Patents Commercialization in India

Abstract Views: 120  |  PDF Views: 93

Authors

Mamta Bhardwaj
DST-Centre for Policy Research, Panjab University, Chandigarh — 160 014,, India
Amandeep Sandhu
DST-Centre for Policy Research, Panjab University, Chandigarh — 160 014,, India

Abstract


As per the Patents Act, 1970 one of the patentability criteria is ‘the invention should have industrial application’. The patents’ rights conferred to the patentee are merely not to enjoy the monopoly over the invention, but the patentee has to ensure the use of technology for the societal and economic benefit of the country. Once the patent is granted, the patentee has to ensure the working of the patent in India on a commercial scale. In return, the patentee gets his due amount for his hard work and efforts rendered for the intellectual creativity. Current paper focuses on the working/non-working profile of the patents granted to Indian Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) and National Research Labs (NRLs) in the country from January 2010 to December 2017. The data has been procured from the prescribed ‘Form-27’ by the Indian Patent Office, which the patentee is required to file every year before the end of financial year, post grant of the patent. The research depicts in how many patentees submitted requisite ‘Form-27’, and in how many cases patents granted, worked or didn’t work. Moreover, various reasons cited for the non-working of the patents have also been identified. The issues being encountered with by the patentees have been identified and measures thereof required to be taken, at the individual level, institutional level and government level, have also been suggested.

Keywords


Form-27, Working/Non-Working Patents, Licensing, Compulsory Licensing.

References