Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Framing Intellectual Property Rights in the Indian Print Media


Affiliations
1 Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Schoolof Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi — 110 067, India., India
 

To implement the ”National IP Policy 2016”, Indian Government launched an awareness campaign and initiated the process to introduce the IPR Policy Model for educational institutions at the pan-India level in 2019. In contexts of this, the study analyses the IPR news framing in selected national and vernacular newspapers during the “National IPR Policy 2016” making process and implementation of the policy. Not much scholarly attention has been devoted to the studies of media coverage of IPRs in Indian contexts. The study is based on the content analysisof the selected national and vernacular newspapers and discusses the media coverage frames with National IPR Policy 2016 objectives. The study finds that the regulatory frame is the most dominant frame in media coverageof IPR issues. However, media coverage does not look consistent with the National IPR Policy 2016 framework that focuses much on awareness and economic development. The primary application of this study is to assist policy makers, industries, and other stakeholders in understanding how their information on IPR could be presented to the public.

Keywords

IPR Communication, Framing, Awareness, Newspapers, National IPR Policy 2016.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • National Intellectual Property Rights Policy of India, 2016.
  • Press Information Bureau, ‘KAPILA’ for patent awareness, https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1695149 (accessed on 11 February 2021).
  • CIPAM, Scheme for IPR awareness, http://cipam.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Scheme-IPR-Awareness.pdf (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  • United Nations, World population prospects 2019, https://population.un.org/wpp (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  • WIPO, Global Innovation Index (2020), who will finance the innovation? https://www.wipo.int/ global_innovation_index/ en/2020 (accessed on 20 February 2021).
  • https://www.livemint.com/Politics/LkKhP62yJrhSRJZDoqD IiN/Indias-patent-problems.html (accessed on 20 February 2021).
  • https://www.livemint.com/Politics/Rap1LeEuftJTFehNt00gT J/Study-shows-low-IPR-awareness-in-India.html (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  • WIPO Magazine, The challenge of protecting intellectual property. https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2016/si/article_000 4.html (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  • OECD, Trade infake goods is now 3.3% of world trade and rising, https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/trade-in-fake-goods-is-now-33-of-world-trade-and-rising.htm (accessed on 13 February 2021).
  • De Vreese C H, Peter J & Semetko H A, Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news, Political Communication,18 (2) (2001) 107–122.
  • Daizadeh Iraj, Patent journalism: An emergence of a new form of science communication, World Patent Information, 30 (3) (2008) 244-247.
  • Nisbet M C & Huge M, Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the press/policy connection, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11 (2) (2006) 3–40.
  • Caulfield T, Human cloning a decade after Dolly, CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal,176 (5) (2007) 613.
  • Du L, Patenting human genes: Chinese academic articles’ portrayal of gene patents, BMC Med Ethics,19 (2018) 29.
  • Petersen A, Biofantasies: genetics and medicine in the print news media, Social Science & Medicine, 52 (8) (2001) 1255–1268.
  • Smith K C, Terry-McElrath Y,Wakefield M, Durrant R, Media advocacy and newspaper coverage of tobacco issues: A comparative analysis of 1 year’s print news in the United States and Australia, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7 (2) (2005) 289–299.
  • Lee W S, Lee M K, Kang S & Yoo J W, The Samsung– Apple patent war: Socio-cultural comparative study of news frames in a business conflict issue, International Communication Gazette, 81 (1) (2019) 46–65.
  • Esmail L C, Phillips K, Kuek V et al., Framing access to medicines in developing countries: An analysis of media coverage of Canada’s access to medicines regime, BMC Int Health Hum Rights10 (2010) 1.
  • Dolak L A & Bettinger B T, The United States patent system in the media mirror, Syracuse Law Review, Forthcoming, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1084420.
  • Liu J, & Yao Z, How to play the game of intellectual property rights in China: The impact of party affiliation and media location on the use of media frames, Asian Journal of Communication, 25 (4) (2015) 371–392.
  • Riker W H, The Art of Political Manipulation, Yale University Press, 1986.
  • Tuchman G, Making news: A study in the construction of reality, Free Press, 1978.
  • Van Gorp B, The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in, Journal of Communication, 57 (2007) 60–78.
  • Entman R M, Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43 (4) (1993) 51–58.
  • Gamson W A & Modigliani A, Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist a pproach, American Journal of Sociology, 95 (1) (1989) 1–37.
  • Nisbet M C & Lewenstein B V, Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970-1999, Science Communication,23 (4) (2002) 359-391.
  • Delshad A & Raymond L, Media framing and public attitudes toward biofuels, Review of Policy Research,30 (2) (2013) 190-210.
  • Weaver D A, Lively E & Bimber B, Searching for a frame: News media tell the story of technological progress, risk, and regulation, Science Communication,31 (2) (2009) 139–166.
  • https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Centre-sets-up-think-tank-for-national-IPR-policy/articleshow/44928886.cms (accessed on 25 January 2021).
  • https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/A-blow-for-the-right-to-knowledge/article14987252.ece (accessed on 30 January 2021).
  • https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Copyright-is-not-a-divine-right-Delhi-HC/articleshow/54372014.cms (accessed on 30 January 2021).
  • https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/national-intellectual-property-rights-policy-patently-a-missed-opportunity/article8 641600.ece (accessed on 15 January 2021).

Abstract Views: 90

PDF Views: 80




  • Framing Intellectual Property Rights in the Indian Print Media

Abstract Views: 90  |  PDF Views: 80

Authors

Prem Chand Yadava
Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Schoolof Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi — 110 067, India., India
Saradindu Bhaduri
Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Schoolof Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi — 110 067, India., India

Abstract


To implement the ”National IP Policy 2016”, Indian Government launched an awareness campaign and initiated the process to introduce the IPR Policy Model for educational institutions at the pan-India level in 2019. In contexts of this, the study analyses the IPR news framing in selected national and vernacular newspapers during the “National IPR Policy 2016” making process and implementation of the policy. Not much scholarly attention has been devoted to the studies of media coverage of IPRs in Indian contexts. The study is based on the content analysisof the selected national and vernacular newspapers and discusses the media coverage frames with National IPR Policy 2016 objectives. The study finds that the regulatory frame is the most dominant frame in media coverageof IPR issues. However, media coverage does not look consistent with the National IPR Policy 2016 framework that focuses much on awareness and economic development. The primary application of this study is to assist policy makers, industries, and other stakeholders in understanding how their information on IPR could be presented to the public.

Keywords


IPR Communication, Framing, Awareness, Newspapers, National IPR Policy 2016.

References