Journal of Intellectual Property Rights

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Protection of Artificial Intelligence Autonomously Generated Works under the Copyright Act, 1957- An Analytical Study


Affiliations
1 School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Research Scholar, National Law University, Jodhpur— 342 304, Rajasthan, India., India
 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not new anymore; it has becomea new normal. In the present 3A era (Advanced, automated and autonomous), the Next Rembrandt paintings, Shimon’s lyrics and songs and Bot Dylan’s Irish folk songs are the works generated by the AI without any considerable human contribution. In the US, the Copyright Act, 1976 does not protect the works generated independently by the AI without human intervention and thus dropping such works in the public domain immediately after their creation. However, in the UK, the Copyright, Patents and the Designs Act, 1988 under Section 9 (3) attributes copyright to “the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken” in case of AI generated works. India has taken a giant leap by considering AI as the joint author along with the human responsible for the creation of work. However, there is not much comprehensive literature available that focuses on the impact of AI being considered as a joint author. This paper aims to create a concrete foundation by emphasising such impact under the Copyright Act, 1957. Furthermore, the paper considers the stance of the US, UK and Australiain protecting AI generated works to suggest measuresto the current copyright regime in India.

Keywords

Copyright, Artificial Intelligence, Autonomous Works, Human Intervention, Joint Authorship.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Haochen S, Redesigning Copyright Protection in the Era of Artificial Intelligence, IOWA Law Review, 107 (3) (2022) 1239-1240.

  • https://www2.deloitte.com/se/sv/pages/technology/articles/pa rt1-artificial-intelligence-defined.html (accessed on 21 June 2022).

  • Monostori L, Encyclopedia of Production Engineering, (CIRP Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 2014, 47-50.

  • Yang Z R & Yang Z, Artificial Neural Networks, (Elsevier), 2014 1-17.

  • Samuel Scholz A, Siri-ous societal issue: Should autonomous artificial intelligence receive patent or copyright protection? Cybaris: An IntellectualProperty Law Review,11 (1) (2020) 83 -84.

  • Acevedo V, Original works of “authorship”: Artificial intelligence as authors of copyright, Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship, 2022, 3 – 6.

  • Yanisky-Ravid S, Generating Rembrandt: Artificial intelligence, copyright, and accountability in the 3A era — The human-like authors are already here — A new model, Michigan State Law Review,2017, 660 – 726

  • Schlackman S, The next Rembrandt: Who holds the copyright in computer generated art, Art Law Journal, 2016.

  • https://copy21.com/2021/08/artificial-authorship-under-indian-copyright-law/ (accessed on 16 June 2022).

  • https://www.managingip.com/article/2a5czmpwixyj23wyqct1 c/exclusive-india-recognises-ai-as-co-author-of-copyrighted-artwork (accessed on 18 June 2022).

  • https://copyright.gov.in/WorkUpload/269639_A_Doc1_09_1 8_2020.pdf (accessed on 27 June 2022).

  • Parliament of India, Rajya Sabha, Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Commerce, Report No 161, Review of The Intellectual Property Rights Regime In India, (Presented To The Rajya Sabha on 23 July 2021).

  • Shtefan A, Creativity and artificial intelligence: A view from the perspective of copyright, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16 (7) (2021) 720- 728.

  • Peng S C, Artificial intelligence and copyright: The authors’ conundrum, 2018, 173-185, chapter_13_2018_e.pdf (wto.org).

  • Spindler G, Copyright Law and Artificial Intelligence, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, 50 (2019) 1049–1051.

  • Davies R, https://quotes.yourdictionary.com/author/ robertson-davies/154154.

  • Naqvi Z, Artificial intelligence, copyright, and copyright infringement, Marquette IntellectualProperty Law Review, 24 (1) (2020) 15-52.

  • Kretschmer M, Meletti B & Porangaba L H, Artificial intelligence and intellectual property: Copyright and patents—a response by the CREATe Centre to the UK Intellectual Property Office’s open consultation, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17 (3) (2022) 321-326.

  • Schroeder JL, Unnatural Rights: Hegel and Intellectual Property, Working Paper No. 80, 2004, http://ssrn. com/abstract=518182.

  • Khaleed Hosseini in his book ‘And the Mountains Echoed’.

  • Vaver D, Principles of Copyright Cases and Materials, (World Intellectual Property Organization), 2002, 32 – 33.

  • Nguyen P, The monkey selfie, artificial intelligence and authorship in copyright: The limits of human rights, Public Interest Law Journal of New Zealand,6 (2019) 121-136.

  • Nowik P, Electronic personhood for artificial intelligence in the workplace, Computer Law & Security Review, 42 (2021).

  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2017/ 10/29/saudi-arabia-which-denies-women-equal-rights-makes-a-robot-a-citizen/ (accessed on 27 June 2022).

  • Oriakhogba D O, Dabus gains territory in South Africa and Australia: Revisiting the AI-inventorship question, South African Journal of Intellectual Property Law,9 (1) (2021) 87-108.

  • Sahni A & Raghav, Artificial Intelligence Painting App, SURYAST, 11886619, 1 December 2021.

  • https://viewpoints.bakermckenzie.com/post/102h4bh/why-cannot-our-own-creations-also-create (accessed on 25 June 2022).

  • WIPO Conversation on Intellectual Property (IP) And Artificial Intelligence (AI), Organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Geneva, 27 September 2019, https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/ en/wipo_ip_ai_ge_19/wipo_ip_ai_ge_19_inf_4.pdf.

  • WIPO Conversation on Intellectual Property (IP) And Artificial Intelligence (AI), Organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Geneva, July 2020, https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo _ip_ai_3_ge_20/wipo_ip_ai_3_ge_20_inf_5.pdf.

  • Thalerv Commissioner of Patents,(2021) FCA 879.

  • Bond T & Blair S, Artificial intelligence & copyright: Section 9(3) or authorship without an author, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 14 (6) (2019) 423.

  • Wu A J, From video games to artificial intelligence: Assigning copyright ownership to works generated by increasingly sophisticated computer programs, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 25 (1) (1997) 131-180.

  • Palace V M, What If artificial intelligence wrote this: Artificial intelligence and Copyright Law, Florida Law Review, 71 (1) (2019) 217.

  • https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/artificial-intelligence-and-intellectual-property-call-for-views (accessed on 27 June 2022).

  • https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/artificial-intelligence-and-ip-copyright-and-patents (accessed on 27 June 2022).

  • U.S. Copyright Office, Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices § 313.2 (3rd ed. 2014).

  • Microsoft Word - 2022.02.14 SIGNED Paradise (AI) Draft Review Board Letter.docx (copyright.gov) (accessed on 27 June 2022).

  • Hristov K, Artificial intelligence and the copyright dilemma, IDEA: The IP Law Review, 57 (3) (2017) 431 – 454.

  • Ahuja V K, Artificialintelligence and copyright: Issues and challenges, ILI Law Review,(Winter Issue 2020) 270 – 285.


Abstract Views: 235

PDF Views: 135




  • Protection of Artificial Intelligence Autonomously Generated Works under the Copyright Act, 1957- An Analytical Study

Abstract Views: 235  |  PDF Views: 135

Authors

Hema K
School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Research Scholar, National Law University, Jodhpur— 342 304, Rajasthan, India., India

Abstract


Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not new anymore; it has becomea new normal. In the present 3A era (Advanced, automated and autonomous), the Next Rembrandt paintings, Shimon’s lyrics and songs and Bot Dylan’s Irish folk songs are the works generated by the AI without any considerable human contribution. In the US, the Copyright Act, 1976 does not protect the works generated independently by the AI without human intervention and thus dropping such works in the public domain immediately after their creation. However, in the UK, the Copyright, Patents and the Designs Act, 1988 under Section 9 (3) attributes copyright to “the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken” in case of AI generated works. India has taken a giant leap by considering AI as the joint author along with the human responsible for the creation of work. However, there is not much comprehensive literature available that focuses on the impact of AI being considered as a joint author. This paper aims to create a concrete foundation by emphasising such impact under the Copyright Act, 1957. Furthermore, the paper considers the stance of the US, UK and Australiain protecting AI generated works to suggest measuresto the current copyright regime in India.

Keywords


Copyright, Artificial Intelligence, Autonomous Works, Human Intervention, Joint Authorship.

References