Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Introduction to Standard Essential Patents Part –III


Affiliations
1 Faculty of Law,University of Delhi, Delhi — 110 007, India., India
 

The modern world is increasingly getting interactive with holistic inter-connectedness; the same is made possible by virtue of standards which in turn sometimesare based on patented technologies. A laptop for instance must have to meet a humongous number of standards and hence requires a patented technology in doing so. But just like the builder doesn’t manufacture bricks on its own, he rather purchases them, so is the case with technological building blocks for any product. These aforesaid patented technological building blocks are the ones that are often termed/ categorized as ‘Standard Essential Patents’.

What motivated us as student of IP laws to usher this domain is the topical and contemporaneous nature along with increase in relevance of this technical domain of patent law. With the ever advancement of technology, this field is highly debated and is being worked upon in various sectors including academics! We being a part of academics and are engaged into the research of this topic would try to give a thorough discourse through a series of articles spanning across upcoming volumes of this journal. This third installment of yearlong series provides a fundamental overview of SEPs. It explains the concept of SEPs, their role in the patent system, and their importance inthe innovation process. It also examines the various types of SEPs, the different licensing models, and the current challenges posed by SEPs. Finally, the article provides an overview of the current legal landscape surrounding SEPs. The article provides a comprehensive introduction to SEPs and their implications in the modernintellectual property landscape.


Keywords

Standard Essential Patents, Standard Setting Organizations, F/RAND, ASI, Bureau of Indian Standards, ETSI.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Pai Y, The rational basis for FRANDly Courts denying injunctive relief for SEPs infringement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2014) 146.
  • Baron J & Spulber D, Technology standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 27 (2018) 462.
  • Pai Y, Standard Essential Patens: Prolegomena, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2014) 61.
  • Pai Y, Comments on DIPP Discussion Paper on SEPs and their Availability on FRAND Terms, NLUD Student Law Journal, 4 (2017) 115.
  • Pai Y, Standard Essential Patens: Prolegomena, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2014) 63.
  • Department of Justice, the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, and the National Institute for Standards and Technology, Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject To Voluntary F/RAND Commitment. www.justice.gov/atr/page/file/1228016/download (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  • http://www.ipindia.nic.in/writereaddata/Portal/News/196_1_ standard%20EssentialPaper_01March2016_1_.pdf (accessed on 29 August 2022).
  • Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council And The European Economic And Social Committee: Setting Out The EU Approach To Standard Essential Patents' (European Commission 2017), https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/26583/attachments /1/translations/en/renditions/native (14 July 2022).
  • Pai Y, The rational basis for FRANDly Courts denying injunctive relief for SEPs infringement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights,19 (2014) 147.
  • https://www.kashishipr.com/blog/standard-essential-patents-and-the-problem-of-regulating-royalties/#:~:text=In%20concise%20terms%2C%20SEPs%2 0or,for%20a%20product%20or%20process (accessed on 29 July 2022).
  • Wright J, SSOs, FRAND, and Antitrust: Lessons from the economics of incomplete contracts, George Mason Law Review, 21 (2014) 791.
  • The Indian Patents Act, 1970, Act (39 of 1970).
  • Tsai J & Wright J, Standard setting, intellectual property rights, and the role of Antitrust in regulating incomplete contracts, Antitrust Law Journal, 80 (2014) 157.
  • Chuffart-Finsterwald S, Patent markets: An opportunity for technology diffusion and F/RAND licensing, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 18 (2019) 339.
  • Chuffart-Finsterwald S, Patent markets: An opportunity for technology diffusion and F/RAND licensing, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 18 (2019) 340.
  • Pai Y & Daryanani N, Patents and Competition Law in India: CCI’s reductionist approach in evaluating Competitive Harm, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 5 (2017) 299.
  • https://www.studiotorta.com/en/editorials/standard-essential-patents/ (accessed on 2 July 2022).
  • Teece D, Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world, Research Policy, 47 (2018)1367.
  • Pai Y & Daryanani N, Patents and Competition Law in India: CCI’s reductionist approach in evaluating Competitive Harm, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 5 (2017) 300.
  • Layne-Farrar A, Standards Development Organizations as two-sided markets, CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 2018, 1.
  • Maldonado K, Breaching RAND and reaching for reasonable: Microsoftv MotorolaAnd Standard-Essential Patent Litigation, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2014, 419.
  • Sidak G, What makes FRAND fair? The just price contract formation, and the division of surplus from voluntary exchange, Criterion Journal of Innovation, 4 (2019) 729-731.
  • https://singhania.in/blog/standard-essential-patents (accessed on 3 July 2022).

Abstract Views: 94

PDF Views: 75




  • An Introduction to Standard Essential Patents Part –III

Abstract Views: 94  |  PDF Views: 75

Authors

Prashant
Faculty of Law,University of Delhi, Delhi — 110 007, India., India
Ashwini Siwal
Faculty of Law,University of Delhi, Delhi — 110 007, India., India

Abstract


The modern world is increasingly getting interactive with holistic inter-connectedness; the same is made possible by virtue of standards which in turn sometimesare based on patented technologies. A laptop for instance must have to meet a humongous number of standards and hence requires a patented technology in doing so. But just like the builder doesn’t manufacture bricks on its own, he rather purchases them, so is the case with technological building blocks for any product. These aforesaid patented technological building blocks are the ones that are often termed/ categorized as ‘Standard Essential Patents’.

What motivated us as student of IP laws to usher this domain is the topical and contemporaneous nature along with increase in relevance of this technical domain of patent law. With the ever advancement of technology, this field is highly debated and is being worked upon in various sectors including academics! We being a part of academics and are engaged into the research of this topic would try to give a thorough discourse through a series of articles spanning across upcoming volumes of this journal. This third installment of yearlong series provides a fundamental overview of SEPs. It explains the concept of SEPs, their role in the patent system, and their importance inthe innovation process. It also examines the various types of SEPs, the different licensing models, and the current challenges posed by SEPs. Finally, the article provides an overview of the current legal landscape surrounding SEPs. The article provides a comprehensive introduction to SEPs and their implications in the modernintellectual property landscape.


Keywords


Standard Essential Patents, Standard Setting Organizations, F/RAND, ASI, Bureau of Indian Standards, ETSI.

References